LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-31-2001, 02:56 PM   #1
cindy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: clearwater, florida
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Unhappy


I currently have Windows ME on 2 new computers in the office. 50% of our programs are dos based. I'm having more trouble than ME is worth. How can I downgrade to Windows 98 (SE)? Please help. Apparently in our attempt to become technology current, the rest of the world has not yet caught up. We also have a dsl line and are networked (peer to peer) On top of all that, our new phone system is not DSL friendly either.
 
Old 04-02-2001, 06:46 AM   #2
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
I dont' think you can just downgrade, but you can just reinstall 98. Reformat and reinstall most likely be the easiest way of going about this I presume.
 
Old 04-02-2001, 11:03 AM   #3
Copenhagen Cowboy
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: D/FW
Posts: 75

Rep: Reputation: 15
If you just did the ME upgrade, then you should be able to uninstall it. If not, then trickykid is right and you'll have to reformat and reinstall.
 
Old 05-19-2001, 11:03 PM   #4
maiof
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question "up"-grading from WinME to Win98SE

hello people... i'm new at this..... so one quick question...

how can i reinstall 98SE over my ME??
i heard i have to format? i dont want to do that because i got all my stuff oon this hd......

can anyone please help??


thanks,
U

------
 
Old 05-21-2001, 08:37 AM   #5
Copenhagen Cowboy
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: D/FW
Posts: 75

Rep: Reputation: 15
Did you install the full version of ME, or just the upgrade??
 
Old 05-21-2001, 01:03 PM   #6
Jeffrey
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: MI
Posts: 67

Rep: Reputation: 15
Talking ...

who the hell would use win ME(willingly)?

its the same as 98 but uses more ram!

the same thing as XP(i here it uses 64 megs base ram)

personally, i prefer win 95 because it uses the same kernel(HAHA) as the others and uses only 4 megs of ram
(plus you can get active desktop for it)

just make a start up(rescue) disk so that you can start up your comp with cd-rom support, and reformat and install 98
from that disk. ive had to do it hundreds of times.
 
Old 05-21-2001, 01:06 PM   #7
Jeffrey
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: MI
Posts: 67

Rep: Reputation: 15
Wink

if you don't want to format, you can just delete the windows directory, but you may need a dosshell thingy so that you don't have to keep answering the "derectory is not empty" replies
 
Old 05-25-2001, 11:56 PM   #8
lordevereste
Member
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 15
That's simpler than you dare dream..

Save your important stuff to disk.. drivers(tho[ win98 will probably have them anyway) Address books, documents, Favourites etc and format the disk, go to cnet.com and search 'format' and you'll have win 98 running in a hour or soo.
 
Old 06-07-2001, 02:20 PM   #9
genericuser
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Did you know:....

The more Ram you have the more is eaten by windows, whatever version it may be...

I have 160 MB... i have 130 free after booting 98SE
a friend has 512MB... he has 380 free after booting the same
what the f*ck

Me doesnt use THAT much more, just a few MB, but whats that nowadays?

quote:"no one will ever need more than 640kb of ram!"




now for the maybe helpful part:
if you have so much stuff on your hds you need to backup just use you lan to temporarily store them on the other machine before formatting and reinstalling

[Edited by genericuser on 06-07-2001 at 04:12 PM]
 
Old 07-03-2001, 09:55 PM   #10
philfighter
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: South of Atlanta
Distribution: Mandrake 8.1, Suse 7.0
Posts: 207

Rep: Reputation: 30
the best thing to do...

yes, i hear your cries...im sorry to say but winME is just for computers that are very new! which means you will have to have at least a 800mHz cpu with 133mhz bus speeds (at least) and 128 megs of RAM... i have an ancient system that is damn - near a 486... i run win95 and suse 7.0 and want for nothing... i program, i run video games, i surf the net and even run some very awesome office suites and get more done than the people i used to work for who run WinME or even <gasp> NT...

Dont tell me it cant be done!
 
Old 07-11-2001, 11:12 PM   #11
Cryptic
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 20

Rep: Reputation: 0
If all else fails, install linux
I had winME on a box for about 3 hours, that was all the time i needed to know it was bad... my wife still has it on her box, p3 1ghz, 256mb ram, 40 gig hd, still has to reboot every hour or so cause of low resources heh. i think i should talk her into letting me install linux on hers too, shed be amazed with a few days of not rebooting, not to mention when she sees a few weeks uptime lol.....
 
Old 07-12-2001, 11:23 AM   #12
philfighter
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: South of Atlanta
Distribution: Mandrake 8.1, Suse 7.0
Posts: 207

Rep: Reputation: 30
hehehehe

yeah crypt... my wife was pissed at me when i decided to turn over our home computer fully to linux. she put up with it for about 6 months then made me go out and get some type of microsoft os...so, of course, i bought win95 for only 30$ i refuse to pay the 180$ for ME especially when it sucks as bad as it does... as for me wife... i let her deal with the bsods...hehehehehe
 
Old 07-12-2001, 06:05 PM   #13
Cryptic
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 20

Rep: Reputation: 0
Yeah, in buying a M$ os I'd go with the 95 also without a doubt. its a little less buggy and more stable. wow, never thought id use the words stable and M$ in the same sentence lol. ya know what tho, i wouldnt have a problem paying 130 or whatever for an os if it were atleast stable, secure out of the box (at least to some extent), and it let ya manipulate it to however ya desire, its nice getting that in linux for so much less money.
 
Old 07-22-2001, 05:51 PM   #14
php
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 827

Rep: Reputation: 30
I love taking 486's and making them happy running on rh 5.2 l33t
 
Old 07-22-2001, 07:57 PM   #15
philfighter
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: South of Atlanta
Distribution: Mandrake 8.1, Suse 7.0
Posts: 207

Rep: Reputation: 30
gui on old 486's?

hey hackers how does the gui perform on those?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows 98SE as a secondary OS on RedHat9 sausagejohnson LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories 8 09-20-2004 06:03 PM
I need a wireless adaptor for Windows 98, i do not have 98SE or newer OS,? Joshua Spett General 5 07-05-2004 02:21 PM
problem with grub and windows 98se drdroid Linux - General 14 11-30-2003 12:10 PM
Wine, samba and windows 98SE zhenwu Linux - Networking 3 02-14-2002 11:15 PM
how to boot mandrake8.0 in a windows 98se vicente Linux - Software 4 09-29-2001 11:36 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration