Heeelllp.....somebody please, draw some rope....this thread is going down the cliff..

Uhhh...because you've laid your hands on some really good 'shrooms?

You take the existence of feminazis, and the indisputable fact that they have created some pathological conditions in society. You overgeneralize it to include all women all the time, and then conclude that these indisputably evil women are the root of all evil in all societies.

Must be some really, really good 'shrooms, man.

Yes, I have. The underlying cause to ALL of this is too many people crammed in too little space. No-one can be "free", they can only fit in. If you don't like it, tough. America used to have lots of room, but just during my lifetime most of that's been filled up. Sure, we could eke out a lot more space by converting farmland to living space, but that will only exaggerate the "we need food or we'll invade you" problem with the third-world countries.

Drivel. There's nothing wrong with the behavior of our women. The fact that you think there is says a lot about you.


No, it's just because I have no problem with my relationship with the rest of the world, and I surely don't feel demeaned in the presence of strong women. If you're a Muslim, or a wannabee, though ...

Let me put this to you another way: With the medical advances that have been made over the past 50 years, women really don't need men anymore. Cloning is really only a few years away and then what? The genie is already out of the bottle. What you propose is not only reprehensible, it's simply too late.

You clearly have not spent much time in the western United States. Outside of the cities, it is as empty as it was a century ago. I can take you to places within 1 hour drive of Phoenix where there is no sign at all of humanity.

Pal, if you want to "control your woman", then you are at least one century late. "Your woman" is not a wild animal, she is HUMAN, damn it, not a prisoner, and NOT your property. The idea shouldn't be THAT difficult to understand, basically it's quite obvious thing.
Right now (at current time) you have following choices:
1) Base your relationships with "your woman" on mutual respect, and caring about each other and live happily.
2) Never get married and die alone at the old age.
3) Change your sexual orientation and never deal with women again.
The choice is yours.

Controlling will get you into broken relationships, divorse, or there are much worse scenarios, which depends on personality of your unlucky partner.

Why the #$%^ some people who claim to believe int God/Jesus/etc also think this cr@ppy idea about "controlling" will still work? Open your eyes, the rules about "controlling" were written many years ago (from centuries to millenia), in completely different society. Believing in God doesn't mean common sense isn't needed anymore!

What will they drink? I don't want to steal this already stolen thread, but do we go the route that the UK has chosen wherein they have a 30% shortfall in foodstuffs every year?. Sure, there may be actual places to stuff people, but there's simply no point in doing it, and nothing to be gained by adding further strain to our ability to provide food and potable water; probably shouldn't forget the energy needs, either.

Oh I like some of you guys...
This idiot writing about controlling women, about time he started to learn some control of his own..
I would welcome him to come over here where i live...

I am sure by the end of a day, I along with my friends would either have him totally sorted or be laughing our heads off at him..
Guys think they can control us, problem is they dont have control themselves, and until that happens, there is no control...

I would rather raise my kids alone than have some tough guy trying to blame every little stuff up of theres upon me...been thru that already and doing a lot better alone, was even raised by my mother(alone) and she ran a cattle and horse stud at the same time, i also am breeding stock and have more problems with guys being lazy than a woman, at least they can work without being told to get off there bottoms...

Sorry to the guys that do get up and do there share, but the loud mouths that say that women need controlling are general the minority group of rat bags that have no control of themselves...

In good aussie slang "Get your hand off it, mate"

On the point of country towns dying and cities lacking foods..
If you decentralized then you would find that a lot of the agricultural areas would produce more food, by centralizing you are limiting the resources of agriculture...
It may be good for big business to have huge cities, but big business doesnt feed you all they do is bleed you...
Most country towns and farms start producing less when the population of the area is reduced, the small farms that provide huge amounts of food per acre are just not profittable when the retail side of things is too far away...
and on top of that, cities are not healthy anyway...

In my home area its happening already, population has reduced, people left the area, farms not able to get labour so they stop producing and plant trees, end result, food is imported to cover the massive short fall, yet this area was the food bowl for our state, until recently...

One word solution, "Decentralize"

You can have him IF you promise not to let him go near any internet connection.

The point is not that they can't forcibly extend their laws to other people, but that the system of justice is now perverted with different classes of justice. I have said last year when people were talking about allowing some form of expression of sharia law in the UK that it was absolute nonsense from the point of view of law. In Australia the aborigines enjoy (or suffer) some form of dual judicial system and the fact is that such a system is far more open to abuse than the single system of law. So far I only see the French getting things right - ban the burkha. The Netherlands have let things get out of hand and people are being murdered by religious fanatics; some people even say that the state is sponsoring terrorist ideology schools. For much more information on such subjects: http://www.apostatesofislam.com/

I consider this kowtowing on par with Hitler apologists - you know the type: "Hitler wasn't really bad, he was just misunderstood."

I didn't want to go there but since you brought it up:

I figure it's more like people could read what the plan was in 'Mein Kampf' (first published in 1925 - wayy before things turned ugly) but just figured he doesn't really mean that.

Pretty much the same is going on with those religious nutcases - this kind of thinking already lead to 9/11 (there were terrorism experts warnings about what a nice cruise missile passenger planes would make years before the act but then again the gov geniuses figured - Hey they ain't going to do this).

I used to enjoy escaping from Phoenix (although when I lived there I thought it was one of the best cities on the planet - and the population was still only 1M). Unfortunately even in the 1980s there were quite a few remote areas where you could find traces of humans - "Mt Pleasant", the history books claim, was actually pleasant - but when I was there the river stank like raw sewage and some losers were obviously dumping garbage there (mostly used tires). It's tough living in the dessert though. Wisconsin and Montana are still (mostly) gorgeous and driving through those states you can see there's still quite a bit of wilderness. I also prefer the green trees and grass to the ubiquitous jolla cactus (although the dessert in bloom is really awesome).

so wrong.


at least one century too late? thats just a nonsense comment, and shows your 'linear' and flawed way of thinking, Erv.

are you telling me that men could not send women back to the 19th century if we really wanted too? ofcourse we could.

oh and by the way, women are closer to the animal kingdom than to being humans. your comments above shows just how niave some men can be.

you think that just because they look somewhat similar to men, that they are the same. you are so wrong.

men can control ourselves, but having to control women at the same time, when they should be able to control themselves is hard work, especially when your dealing with selfish destructive creatures like women. we shouldnt have to deal with it. period.

you personally may be in the minority of women who do actually do something, but the majority of women sit around getting their drones (men) to work for them.

consumption is driven by women.

now look at the US and Britian and tell me everythings alright.

bashyow - Why don't you open a new thread in networking or so about this and quit the OT BS?