The Faith & Religion mega Thread

It seems silly to think we were just poofed here, along with a language but then evolved it with ideas; tho, that's just a bunches-religious-opinions, educated or not, at time. How about: https://html.duckduckgo.com/html/?q=list+of+creation+theories

Forest don't need be planted so why solar systems, especially if infinite?

Ask me the only devils or angels: opinions, to take time from and oppose education and quality of life.

Course a kill or let kill( liking it or not) type will tell you that's only my opinion... none of us has stopped killing yet so maybe they're right,,, on opinions that is! http://www.lucernevalley.net/funnies.htm

Sorry jamison20000e - it is not about your opinion - you have just bad habit to constantly talk to yourself in public. I mean you are the only person who understand your posts.

Sometimes.

If I don't understand an opinion, I may ask but it's never a fact.

Othertimes whocares, babies, dictaters?

What religion to choose, to stay born into one, to make something up, teach your children to rely on everyone else: these are opinions.

Don't be salty, accept we are more options than gardens!

Evolving!

In no way shape or form am I sorry, if we can say anything you'd be a moron...

I didn't think Texas knew how to catch and release?
L🐟L

I may add that you not only talk to yourself in public but you also don't listen to anyone except you.

Edit: Please accept apologies. I am sometimes too rough in my relations with others. Hard life made me like that. To be more constructive: religion can be discussed by many ways. For example sociology, psychology, philosophy, history. Even politics. Public debate is for trying to convince those who witness the debate. Private debate is only possible if people are willing to change their stance on the subject. My personal experience is that I was twelve year boy and made promise I keep all my life. I think that it is almost not possible for child in such age to make such promise - so hard encoded. So I tell to myself that God has written it in my heart. For other people just a story - there are more excited for sure. For me something very important.

Nerves get struck because, quite simply freedom of speech (or any "laws") would not need to exist if wrong and right did.

Opinions like religions are ebbs to eating carrots as flows...

My opinion is to throw stones at all opinions and as stated, if all hope seems lost I might tumble off into space.

.sdrawkcab daerht eht daer tsuJ

I know that Evolution (like in electric vehicles) will take care of religion so I don't need to!

Peace!

Peace!

I guess being preyed on as a twelve-year-old is better than the 18 year olds that get sucked into killing each other for war; by the worse than most priests,,, recruiters! Unless of course you live in a "country" where your religion just sticks a gun in your hand at any age?!

So maybe we should have said peace evolving, hopefully...

Don't get me wrong tho, (if we're lucky to grow up) growing up we all learn more opinions than anything.

There are essentially two opinions about opinions. One is that there is The Truth. The other is that there are only opinions - as many truths as people. There are similarities because we are similar and live in similar conditions. But beside that everyone thinks what it to and choose what to belief. Religious people are focused on former one. There is The Truth. But also strict atheist for example are focused on The Truth that "there is no God". for declared atheist it is not just only opinion. What does it mean? It means that for example they both can reach the same conclusions. Because truth is truth and one can not neglect it. Both parties declare truth exists which creates space for debate - for example about moral things. Say believer can neglect source of moral teachings in such debate. From other side: can Evolution be source of moral teachings? Or nature?

Originally Posted by igadoter There are essentially two opinions about opinions. One is that there is The Truth. The other is that there are only opinions - as many truths as people. There are similarities because we are similar and live in similar conditions. But beside that everyone thinks what it to and choose what to belief. Religious people are focused on former one. There is The Truth. But also strict atheist for example are focused on The Truth that "there is no God". for declared atheist it is not just only opinion. What does it mean? It means that for example they both can reach the same conclusions. Because truth is truth and one can not neglect it. Both parties declare truth exists which creates space for debate - for example about moral things. Say believer can neglect source of moral teachings in such debate. From other side: can Evolution be source of moral teachings? Or nature?

You're walking a windy path with that one? I'd say there are infinite kinds of opinions. Just like we could make up a religion every second, weather we can get people to believe them or not.

https://www.scoopwhoop.com/world/bizarre-religions/ I've said it before in this thread: just pray to me!

The word fact, means fact, more often than truth in today's language?

A carrot is a fact we all can swallow.

Nature and opinions clearly evolve so we can reach, what all can agree on, morality is? But. If they raise rabbits or chickens for profit they do some wonky things, raising people seems no different...

https://www.veganism.com/introductio...nic-gardening/
https://veganicpermaculture.com/
Though, I eat fish in this life so aquaponic me.

Problem is that science relies on concept of absolute truth. Sun exists - it is not an opinion. You can put in weaker form that "things proved by science" cannot be questioned. You don't think about your doctor as I kind shaman who is recovering you because of powers it posses.

Facts rely on an absolute truth.

Both science and religion arguably are more "opinions" than anything... one is allowed to evolve faster than the other tho?

We learn from history unimaginably slow...

Say that "truth" is just opinion so fixed that person see no possibilities to change it. More - that person spend quite a lot of time to justify that opinion. But there also "changeable" opinions. They are rather expressions that person not quite sure, but has no evidence to reject it.

A scientist says: "I'm this kind of scientist," a religious person says: "I'm this religion..." both are only human.

If right or wrong where fats? I'd tell you to imagine being anyone else on the planet but I wouldn't want to make you think a killer seems they're not!

We just don't think we're imagining opinions like religions because you were taught wool sleep-masks...
💀🙈💀🙉💀🙊💀

Do you think the future would be boring without opinions? I don't.