LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-18-2007, 04:36 AM   #1
sunils1973
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: INDIA
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 340

Rep: Reputation: 30
slackware kernel vs system V


I have a AMD sempron 3000 System. My plan was to install suse linux but as i bought a magazine, got dvd of slackware linux 11. I notices that the kernal version of slackware linux is much less than that of other linux distributions like redhat and suse. Moreover, I learned that slackware linux is following BSD style and others follows system V style. I had installed Suse linux 10.2 in my office.
Is is true that slackware is more efficient and faster than Suse?
Which one is better for database server like mysql?
Is there any difficulties in exchanging programs and data between these two distributions?

I have downloaded slackware linux for AMD machine. Can I expect any performance benefit by installing the same on my machine over Suse linux?

Is the lower kernal version number in slackware indicates it is behind Suse or redhat?
 
Old 03-18-2007, 05:46 AM   #2
phil.d.g
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,272

Rep: Reputation: 154Reputation: 154
The kernel was the latest 2.4 kernel at the time of the release of Slackware. Slackware kept with the 2.4 kernel because the maintainer deemed 2.6 not yet ready for Slackware. However there is a 2.6 kernel in /testing on the ftp server. Remember the 2.4 kernel is still being maintained.

The lower kernel version does not indicate Slackware is behind other distributions, it indicates Slackware is more conservative. 2.4.33.3 was only released around august 2006 and Slackware 11.0 about September.

If this machine is to be used in a production environment then I would say use whatever you know best.
 
Old 03-18-2007, 10:52 AM   #3
truthfatal
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Distribution: Raspbian, Debian, Slackware, OS X
Posts: 443
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 32
There are also two 2.6.* kernels on the install disk. there's a 2.6.17.13 called "huge26.s" and there's a 2.6.18 called "test26.s" both require a separate "modules" package to be installed after first boot.

I would say 'careful' before 'conservative,' but otherwise agree with phil.d.g on his second and third points.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
kernel panic after installing kernel-2.4.27 on 2.6.8 system kpachopoulos Debian 4 04-10-2006 12:03 AM
1 of the 2 slackware on system is for testing...kernel compilation/permission issues b0nd Linux - Newbie 1 01-21-2006 01:20 PM
I want to compile 2.6 kernel and keep everything from 2.4 intact (dual kernel system) sina_kish Linux - Software 7 02-02-2005 09:01 AM
Slackware 10, custom 2.6.7 kernel, lilo, loads kernel very slowly entropyv Slackware 3 08-19-2004 06:06 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration