Relationship between unit allocation size and filesystem overhead
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Dabble, but latest used are Fedora 13 and Ubuntu 10.4.1
Posts: 425
Rep:
Relationship between unit allocation size and filesystem overhead
What is the relationship between unit allocation size and filesystem overhead? Specifically, I have a 250gig external drive, NTFS, default allocation size, and once formatted, Win7 tells me I have 232 gig of usable space. Fine. I've essentially got 18 gig of overhead. If I change my allocation size down to 512 bytes, will my overhead increase?
I know that there will be a performance hit due to the larger number of block seeks and that defragging will be longer and more important with the smaller blocks. Question is, will it affect the size of the overhead?
Reckon the best way to find out is ... to find out.
Most likely, making the allocation-size smaller will cause the filesystem data structures to become larger, thus consuming more space, because now the system has to keep track of more allocation-units.
Distribution: Dabble, but latest used are Fedora 13 and Ubuntu 10.4.1
Posts: 425
Original Poster
Rep:
That's what I thought. My question was whether anyone had previously done the experiment or the math, and figured out how much of an increase there would be.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.