GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi,in the UK and Europe the police can currently search a pc remotely over the internet, the powers extend to downloading keyloggers and other malware. Currently this can be done without a court warrant, and was done hundreds of times last year.
Please find a couple of minutes to visit this petition to the Prime Minister and have a read - if you think its wrong then sign it , and forward the link as widely as possible.
I, as many others here, am running linux, not windows, and nobody can "search a PC remotely" , if it is mine and I am running linux, without my express consent, which I am not giving without a court order (unlikely).
Sorry for just posting this out of the blue on this forum... I am tryinhg to draw attention to this issue. If it would be better being removed to a different place, then fine.
I do however feel that it is important for all computer users, not just the traditionally vulnarable windows victims. It doesn't really matter what you run on your box, there are techniques available to the best minds in IT that can gain access to your machine, to believe otherwise is not sensible.
Sorry for just posting this out of the blue on this forum... I am tryinh to draw attention to this issue. If it would be better being removed to a different place, then fine.
I do however feel that it is important for all computer users, not just the traditionally vulnarable windows victims. It doesn't really matter what you run on your box, there are techniques available to the best minds in IT that can gain access to your machine, to believe otherwise is not sensible.
Even a mildly hardened Linux box is pretty tough to get into. If any IP tries and fails three times to log on to my machine, that IP is blocked for three hours. That means that the intruder can only use any one IP three times (every three hours). Considering the thousands (assuming a common password) attempts that will have to be made, they better have a lot of IPs available to them. Since I change my passwords every thirty days, that also limits them to 720 (24hrs per day * 3 attempts/3hrs *30days ) attempts per IP. Even if you limited yourself to 1,000,000 passwords, they would still need 1389 IPs. Even then most of us have things setup so that if too many failed login attempts occur we get notified.
Hi,in the UK and Europe the police can currently search a pc remotely over the internet, the powers extend to downloading keyloggers and other malware.
Do the powers that be also make you keep your pc plugged in and on line at all times? Unless they are there and watching you at all times, it would be a little hard to do what you say. If you think this is happening or could happen to you, then you should dump windows all together. Install linux and set up a good iptables/firewall. Start the firewall with everything blocked then open only the services you need, set it so it will drop all unwanted packets not just deny them. Signing a petition does little if anything.
This guy seems to be a drive-by crusader, and probably has no further interest in this thread. In any case, the phrase "and forward the link as widely as possible" makes it an internet chain letter and should signal a close to the thread.
Intel was forced by the US government to put a 'car licence plate' in every CPU. They said it had to be switched on voluntarilly by the box's owner, they said privacy was their *first* design criterion. According to New Scientist magazine this thing can be switched on by anyone remotely over the internet.
Against this background, and the background of Windows constantly sending stuff to Bill without the owner's knowledge, I react with dismay to what appears to be the hostile response to this poster. I will certainly sign his petition and anyone who does not is at perfect liberty to imprison themselves but has, I suggest, no right to imprison me.
We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to require the police to obtain a court warrant before searching personal computers remotely over the internet
They need to have a warrant before they can search your house. This petition is to get the same requirement for your computer, if you live in the UK (or EU). I've no idea whether these searches are possible, but would prefer to have some legal safeguard such as a warrant.
NO, there aren't. But you can prove me wrong by leaving file on my KDE desktop.
I think all applications have some degree of vulnerability, the trick is in finding the hole(s). This is why I don't think government hackers can be stopped, only slowed down; backed by the power of the state, they have all the time, money, and resources they need to find a way into a system. It may even take them years waiting for a target to make a mistake.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.