lsattr: Operation not supported While reading flags
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
You must not read people's sig. My O.S. is in it !
How do you know I did not use google ?
You make a lot of assumptions.
Fact is, I used yahoo advanced search.
And no, it does not work on ANY folder.
:-) Linux Puppy is not "non-*NIX", well the last time I checked anyway.
I made the assumption that you didn't use Google or equivalent because in a very short while I was able to find relevant information, and I know next to nothing about Puppy. I was very surprised you hadn't been able to. You should perhaps think about dropping Yahoo as your search engine of choice.
Anyway, the Puppy Linux forum I linked to appears to show that it's a recognised problem. I would suggest that you join that discussion, chase them up, and find out what the problem is, whether there are any workarounds, and how long it might to fix.
Good luck, and let us know if you resolve the problem.
Does anyone actually read sigs? Really? I don't have the time or patience to bother with them.
I used to read them until I realised that people were just putting all sorts of nonsense there such as non-existent places ("Baja Oklahoma" for example).
But seriously, yes I do, if the question is related to the distro and/or DE. I find them pretty useful. In the case of the OP, I thought that the fact that his Puppy Linux is Slacko should have been in the sig, thread title or opening post because that actually might make a difference to the problem and solution. However, I might have been splitting hairs on that one.
To nitpick more, Baja Oklahoma is not in my sig. I don't have a signature. The stuff on the left, under the username, is from the user profile. The sig(nature) is at the bottom of the post. FWIW, not a lot really. Neither is necessarily accurate.
To nitpick more, Baja Oklahoma is not in my sig. I don't have a signature. The stuff on the left, under the username, is from the user profile. The sig(nature) is at the bottom of the post. FWIW, not a lot really. Neither is necessarily accurate.
Ha ha. I know, but the OP erroneously used the word "sig" to refer to his user profile info, so I just assumed you were talking in his "language" when you asked whether anyone looked at sigs any more, and I carried on in that vein.
What a tangled web we weave...
Edit: It turns out that I had the viewing of signatures turned off, so the OP was completely correct. As was sgosnell. May I declare here, for the benefit of these guys and for anyone reading this, that I is an idiot.
Last edited by hydrurga; 07-05-2016 at 04:52 PM.
Reason: Clarification
The OP does have a sig at the bottom of his posts, which actually gives more info than the data on the left. I hadn't bothered to read it, though, and I doubt most visitors do, either. As you don't seem to have...
The OP does have a sig at the bottom of his posts, which actually gives more info than the data on the left. I hadn't bothered to read it, though, and I doubt most visitors do, either. As you don't seem to have...
Is it possible to have the reading of sigs turned off, or these to be blocked somehow in Firefox? Because to be perfectly honest, I'm reading the thread now and I don't see any sigs on any of the posts in the thread. Weird!
Edit: Well I never. I had a setting in Thread Display Options set to not show me any signatures on the posts. :-D
I've set it to show me them now so I don't get caught out again.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.