GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
To watch some of the fun political theatre at the Democrat Nat'l Convention in Denver, I logged on to http://www.demconvention.com.
It's got a video player allowing you to watch the convention live.
While the player will behave with Windows or Mac, and with IE, Firefox or Safari, it won't with Linux.
I'm afraid I know nothing about this, but I wonder:
Why is it necessary to have a special video player?
If a special player is so necessary, why can't it be altogether browser-integrated (and OS-independent) like, for instance, npr.org's audio player?
Compatible operating systems:
Windows XP SP2, Windows Vista, or a Mac with Tiger (OS 10.4) or Leopard (OS 10.5).
Compatible browsers:
Internet Explorer (version 6 or later), Firefox (version 2), or, if you are on a Mac, Safari (version 3.1) also works.
I seriously doubt the Democrats know or care, they're politicians, not web developers. This usually falls on the shoulder of who they hired to develop the site. Bitch all you want, is it gonna change, no, cause they don't care, just like the millions of other sites that only work with IE.
Probably not their choice, just the host provider they chose. They can care less what runs the back end, they just want a website developed by 3rd party sources.
There is Moonlight, which I have had some luck with, for non Windows and Mac users.
How much luck did you have with it, Jevan, viewing real-life sites? I had none (if I understand correctly, currently there is no way to get sound, for example, and the whole thing is in early alpha).
Anyway, things like Silverlight make me smile watching this:
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.