I'm Sorry.

Yes but see that is the thing. When something has been talked about for someone to bring up there own point people come back with something smart saying this has been discussed/talked about to death. Why should someone wanted to add or make a new topic be flamed for wanting to say there 2 cents? So its been talked about so ok maybe to death but I was not here! So what you people are saying and the general consensus is to read others opinions and live with them and not talk about it because it has been talked to death. I just think that it is b.s that when someone has a opinion they are flamed!

We still love you.


You have every right to add your 2 cents. Nobody is implying that you can't express your opinions just because you haven't been around as long/didn't see the original post. We're just asking that you make an effort to search to see if something has previously been posted and to try and minimize duplicate threads. While you may think that duplicating a thread isn't a big deal, you have to keep in mind that there are 86,000+ other members at this site, some of whom might disagree with you.

that's the first time i saw that, and it's really cool, imo.

what's interesting about it to me is that it's almost totally opposite to how computers "read" information, where the sequential order of the binary code or whatever is absolutely essential (i'm not a programmer, but i *think* computers still basically work that way?).

what if we could design a computer that could "interpret" information in the same way that the brain can decipher the scrambled words? i mean at the fundamental levels? i guess that would be closer to a kind of artificial intelligence, right? and it seems to me that would be either total freedom, or total chaos.