GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i dont have that problems since after my redhat9 ... not that i know how to configure it(believe me , i dont) which is a good thing ... i think linux is getting closer and closer to want we want it to be and definately can do a lot more ...
I, in all seriousness, think spending a billion dollars on a Linux distro, even if just a thought experiment, is bloody ridiculous. Again, what does money even have to do with it?
Well, the OP says you were hired to design a linux distro and your BUDGET is 1 Billion. I would assume you cannot spend it on fast cars, women, booze, poor, homeless, or anything other than a Linux distro.
Well, the OP says you were hired to design a linux distro and your BUDGET is 1 Billion. I would assume you cannot spend it on fast cars, women, booze, poor, homeless, or anything other than a Linux distro.
Yeah, I know what the OP wrote. What I am saying is that the premise is so ridiculous that he cannot expect serious answers. harishankar seems to agree (or at least see my point).
Here's another 'serious' answer: I would use $10000 to rebrand and cut a bunch of Gentoo CDs, and pocket the other $999990000...
Want me to go away Sepero? Just explain why you think you need a billion dollars to create such an operating system
If I had a billion dollars, I'd scrap the OS project and buy lots and lots of land to preserve it. Like buy a big bulk of the Amazon and other land that is endangered of being destroyed by evil corporations that want to turn the world into a big slab of concrete.
Lets see here
I'd create a new FS, modeled after a database system like SQL
I'd make real documention
none of this sparse terse example ridden texts we have now
documentation that when you do: man [cmd]
one of the first things you see is an example of the syntax
not [cmd] [ -o /path [options [sodomy] ] [more options] [-optional but needs to be in this order] [can only be used after the latter option but the optional sodomy switch needs to be used but not the next switch] [I format everything into fat12 of you use me but somehow I'm very important]
ect ect ect
and DRIVERS!
hardware support
we have enough distros now as it is
we need stuff that makes it easier to use now - if not for us for the average generic user.
I will hire lots of programmers, some interaction designers and some graphic designers and develop ZenSUI (an interface) and bonsai (an API for the interface) all in OpenGL.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.