LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-02-2012, 08:33 AM   #1
jlinkels
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire, Leeuwarden
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,195

Rep: Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043
Blackberry scam


My wife needed a new cell phone and I have the chance to buy a Blackberry 8320 new in box for a reasonable price. I know it is outdated but I (she) don't need the latest and greatest. But calender sync was one of the main reasons to get her a smartphone to get her a bit more organized.

The Blackberry would not recognize my WiFi at home. Only the the neighbour's AP across the street. My WiFi is ancient as well, one of the first generation access points, using a Avaya/Orinoco PCMCIA card at 11 mbps, WEP only. As it seems more and more devices seem to have a problem with this kind of access point.

So just to be able to connect with the Blackberry I put in another AP, WPA 54 mbits blahblahblah. The Blackberry connected fine.

To my surpise, it is impossible to synchronize with Google Calendar without a data plan. Blackberry cannot synchronize with Google over WiFi!

After browsing several forums, it seems that this limitation is on purpose to force users to buy a data plan. The limitation is not technical of course.

I think this is an incredible scam. Can't I expect in 2012 that a WiFi capable device just synchronizes over WiFi? I don't have a data plan, and I don't want to buy one either.

So I bought a now access point for no reason, spent a few hours configuring the Blackberry, just to discover this. Very nice. I won't come near to a Blackberry for the rest of my life.

Any recommendations as to buy a device which:
- can make phone calls
- can sync contacts with Google contacts
- contains a calendar and can sync Google Calendar
- SSH connectivity is a pre
- should not run a Microsoft platform as OS.

Other applications not important. I know this looks a lot like my iPhone 3. I just don't feel paying for the iPhone hype again.

jlinkels

Last edited by jlinkels; 05-02-2012 at 08:34 AM.
 
Old 05-02-2012, 08:43 AM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
not sure what the point of the question is.... you don't want an iPhone or a win7 phone and not a blackberry... so that's an android handset. end of story.
 
Old 05-02-2012, 01:08 PM   #3
spudgunner
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 229

Rep: Reputation: 20
Any Android phone. And on the plus side, if you root it and install a custom ROM, you deal with less carrier and manufacturer bloat.
 
Old 05-02-2012, 01:10 PM   #4
suicidaleggroll
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS
Posts: 5,573

Rep: Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142
Quote:
Originally Posted by acid_kewpie View Post
not sure what the point of the question is.... you don't want an iPhone or a win7 phone and not a blackberry... so that's an android handset. end of story.
Agreed. Personally I'm not a fan of Android, I think the UI still has a long way to go, but you have literally eliminated every other option...it's the only one left.
 
Old 05-02-2012, 01:17 PM   #5
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680

Rep: Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373
Thanks for the heads-up. I've considered buying a Blackberry for a while and until I read this I didn't realise you actually need a Blackberry internet plan to use them! Not just that you need a data plan, that I have, but you need to spend extra on a Blackberry specific plan -- at least that seems to be the case after a quick google.
A real shame because I like the devices and really don't want to get involved with Google and have to sign over all my data to them just to use a smart phone.
 
Old 05-02-2012, 01:48 PM   #6
jlinkels
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire, Leeuwarden
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,195

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043Reputation: 1043
Until this morning I was a perfect noob regarding phones, so thanks for the answers!

Indeed, it seems Android is the way to go, although even there you have be cautious.

Like the Motorola where you are obliged to create and use a Motoblur account before you can use your phone (which retarded PR bureau ever came up with such a name??). And it is not even clear if you need a data plan before you are able to connect to Motorola and start using you phone. Those things scare me.

I think I will settle for a Samsung Android phone. It has very nice specs, and as it seems it is about as open as a phone can get in 2012. And yes, I plan to use Google apps for contacts and calender.

I can understand doubts about storing data at Google. But for the time being I prefer to store data at Google (and even have them peeking into it) as opposed to restrictions and obligations on other platforms.

jlinkels
 
Old 05-03-2012, 07:26 AM   #7
spudgunner
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 229

Rep: Reputation: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlinkels View Post
Like the Motorola where you are obliged to create and use a Motoblur account before you can use your phone (which retarded PR bureau ever came up with such a name??). And it is not even clear if you need a data plan before you are able to connect to Motorola and start using you phone. Those things scare me.
Like I mentioned in my previous post, if the first thing you do with the phone is unlock the bootloader and flash a custom ROM, you don't have to worry about any carrier/manufacturer BS.

That being said, Samsung makes some nice phones. I'm currently using the Nexus S with an aftermarket ROM and it works great!

EDIT: I also know that with select phones, there is a way to re-lock them and fully reset them so that you can get it in for warranty work if needed. Research would definitely be helpful.

Last edited by spudgunner; 05-03-2012 at 07:28 AM.
 
Old 05-03-2012, 07:36 AM   #8
linuxlover.chaitanya
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Gurgaon, India
Distribution: Cent OS 6/7
Posts: 4,631

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
From the phones that I have seen, I have liked HTC sensation, Samsung Galaxy S2 and Sony Xperia Arc and X10. Samsung really does not have much of a design but works great. Sony makes really very good looking products. Best of them for me. But I use BlackBerry Curve 9300 and not using any data plan. Only BB messenger.
 
Old 05-03-2012, 07:37 AM   #9
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
Samsung Galaxy S3 being launched in 5 hours
 
Old 05-03-2012, 07:50 AM   #10
linuxlover.chaitanya
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Gurgaon, India
Distribution: Cent OS 6/7
Posts: 4,631

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Just hope and wish Galaxy S3 looks better than S2. S2 really is very boxy.
 
Old 05-03-2012, 07:56 AM   #11
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
Well either Samsung have no design, OR they're currently being sued by Apply for their devices looking like iThings... S2 looked pretty nice to me.
 
Old 05-03-2012, 08:14 AM   #12
linuxlover.chaitanya
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Gurgaon, India
Distribution: Cent OS 6/7
Posts: 4,631

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
S2 is a nice phone but compared to HTCs and Sonys, its got a bit boring design. Just plain simple rectangular design.
 
Old 05-03-2012, 08:19 AM   #13
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
I think most people would think that "boring" is actually subtle understated style...
 
Old 05-03-2012, 08:20 AM   #14
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680

Rep: Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373
I never really understand why people care what their phone looks like. Personally I want a hardware qwerty keyboard and a decent battery life -- couldn't care less what it looks like.

Last edited by 273; 05-03-2012 at 08:22 AM.
 
Old 05-03-2012, 09:46 AM   #15
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
Quote:
Originally Posted by 273 View Post
I never really understand why people care what their phone looks like. Personally I want a hardware qwerty keyboard and a decent battery life -- couldn't care less what it looks like.
What if it looked like something 8 inches long and weighing half a kilo? Things looking good is usually very closely related to subtle design features which make a phone a joy to use comapred to annoying and frustrating. So many "nice" things are there for a reason.

I think you're going to have to give up on the hardware keyboard, I can't imagine anyone making a phone with a hardware keyboard soon, especially once RIM go under in the near future.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Not-really-serious-post about a scam salasi General 4 05-23-2010 10:50 AM
scam the scammer rusekd General 3 12-02-2004 10:24 AM
Ebay Scam RolledOat General 8 07-18-2004 11:40 AM
This ebay page seems like a scam. bolinux General 8 11-26-2003 05:59 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration