Because Shiny Things Are Fun - The New New Windows v Linux Thread
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It doesn't matter how many linux vs windows threads are created. Linux will always come on top here because this is a linux dedicated forum. The same could be said for windows and mac as well if you go to a dedicated forum for them.
Personally, I don't need a linux vs windows thread to convince me to use linux. I know the pros and cons of each and frankly for me, linux outweighs windows by a landslide.
Just my opinion, but MS already try the mobile market and their devices didn't make any big impacts on the mobile market share. MS is trying to win the battle but Google and Apple already won the war.
7 and even Vista really are not terrible IF you have the hardware to run them
W2k is quite underrated
Windows 8 is complete and udder garbage. Worst UI screwup
7 and vista is still, bloated and not a huge improvement from XP.
W2k is a rather stable Windows operating system, my takeaway shop has a computer that runs 2000, and it never crash...
I agree with you, Windows 8's UI is more for tablet and really Microsoft really sucked on this one. There is also graphic driver and bugs problems as well as updates being crap.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,339
Rep:
Good lesson to learn (especially if running Windows!)
My mother got hit by Cryptowall which is particularly nasty ransomware
Lost everything. That is exactly why you need to back things up
7 and vista is still, bloated and not a huge improvement from XP.
W2k is a rather stable Windows operating system, my takeaway shop has a computer that runs 2000, and it never crash...
I agree with you, Windows 8's UI is more for tablet and really Microsoft really sucked on this one. There is also graphic driver and bugs problems as well as updates being crap.
I've said before, w2k was the best. XP they removed the support to be able to control swap %, it had IE so tangled into it that running as a non admin malware could still easily install. I had problems with USB, resume, etc. Things that worked in w2k for months would just stop working at random in xp
I guess the only good thing about XP was it drove me to Linux.
Read the article. Wow! wouldn't have guessed that it could be that bad. Glad I'm running linux.
Perhaps the people at microsoft will one day care and see the danger of these types of apps and stop approving almost everything for the sake of quantity.
The google store had a similar dilemma, more so at the beginning. Today, they have limited the amount of malware in the store but a few get by.
Either way, before I install an app, I look at the ratings and reviews of the apps.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.