Because Shiny Things Are Fun - The New New Windows v Linux Thread
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
You could say that FOSS realises the dream of Adam Smith, a world in which competition for market share drives up quality and keeps prices low for everybody's benefit. Proprietary software allows scandalously high prices and poor quality software because legal restrictions hobble competition. Yet in America, Microsoft is regarded as the fulfilment of the American dream and Linux is something that only commies and criminal hackers use.
Yet in America, ..... Linux is something that only commies and criminal hackers use.
I am not sure if this is serious or sarcastic? But, a LOT of businesses / universities and government systems (in the US) now run Linux. I've never actually heard anyone say that here; perhaps, I missed the memo??
It's not entirely sarcastic. You used to see a lot of American literature on how to spot if your child had been radicalised. Apparently using Linux was regarded in those days as a danger sign.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc.901
I am not sure if this is serious or sarcastic? But, a LOT of businesses / universities and government systems (in the US) now run Linux. I've never actually heard anyone say that here; perhaps, I missed the memo??
I have seen Linux described as "communist" before both as a pejorative and as praise, depending on the viewpoint. I think Steve Balmer was, perhaps, the most famous to say it but I've seen anything from forum posts to YouTube videos mention it with varying degrees of seriousness.
Sadly I can't find the quote where Linus states that Linux is more "everyone for themselves" than communism.
Is my wifes touchscreen laptop and was stuck in Windows 10 boot loop going no where. No way to even run F8 and try and restore from backup partition. This all happened and the wife never made a recovery usb or dvd disc. Long story short. Nuked Windows. Installed MX linux. Now. The laptop only freezes up after a hour of running. You guessed it Failing hard drive.
So. My inept fingers took this laptop apart and proceeded to fubar the sata interface wiring hookup . Bios now does not see any hard drive. Old one or New one. Me, like a bear in china cabinet.
So. Posting this on persist usb of AntiX. Live run with root being changeable. That was how I got the wifi working
Cuz kernel did not have that module. Wondering how well a external slim 1TB super glued to back of lcd monitor will run on usb connection with a conventional install.
Just crazy thoughts one does not have while using Windows. If I was Windows centric. Trash laptop after pulling ram and other parts.
Buy new Windows 10 laptop. Which I did. Wife now has a new Dell 17 incher Windows 10 laptop. I just keep the dregs here in the motorcycle shop.
I have an Acer old laptop here which was previously running OpenBSD, but which I have wiped and was intending to restore to it's previous state of running Windows Vista and pass on to others... one of the annoying things about Windows is that you just can't get hold of installation media and/or if you do get hold of an old disc, it's often the wrong edition, architecture, OEM anyway...
I bought an old Apple at a thrift store one year they thought it was a television set, 20 bucks. Got the old thing home and updated the operating system all the way to the current version, Leopard or something like that at the time... I could leave it at the market took care of that but instead I run Linux, updates forever because that's how long we will live! LOL
The next time I tried updating that old Apple, bricked it thanks Apple. Now I got a drive to put into an older computer and gave to some kids at school with Linux on it.
Last edited by jamison20000e; 08-05-2019 at 04:18 PM.
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by YesItsMe
Because Linux is for kids.
Looks like today's "kids" are spoiled then, since it's some form of Linux that runs almost everything like supercomputers, servers, etc... and that's right, doesn't M$ have their own Linux distro? And I seem to recall they have, now, what was that called... that's right, Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL)? Don't some of the most famous websites run on Linux too? Wonder why, must be a lot of "kids" out there...
And I seem to recall they have, now, what was that called... that's right, Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL)?
WSL and now WSL2. It's an attempt to keep Linux systems off "bare metal" and maintain the market for Windows server. When all is said and done, the competitor is Red Hat, when it comes to "the cloud", etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbjsb001
Don't some of the most famous websites run on Linux too? Wonder why, must be a lot of "kids" out there...
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
Yeah, I was thinking a very similar thing about WSL/WSL2 only today. In that: why would someone what to use Windows to run Linux apps, when they can just use Linux [some distro of] itself? The only real benefit I can see for anyone to do that would be, if you were developing both Windows and Linux apps. Beyond that kind of situation, I don't see any real benefit to using WSL/WSL2 if one wants to run Linux apps. I think M$ also knows this, and you've more or less said the real motivation above. In that, if you can run your Linux apps on Windows, and you particularly if you also need Windows as well, then you can install WSL/WSL2, and therefore forget about installing Linux on bare-metal - what better way to keep you from installing Linux proper/on bare-metal. You can just use M$ Linux/WSL instead, therefore Windows is still installed as the OS on the bare-metal. Similar story regarding GitHub no doubt.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.