Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
06-10-2008, 10:22 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 76
Rep:
|
fedora 8 - no update
hi guys,
i have freshly installed fc8 and i am getting some problems when it tries to install the updates from the fedora-updates web site.
what happens is that fedora download all the updates from the site (about 700) but makes an error when intalling them and STOPS ... " an error occurred when trying to install updates ." but i don know which error it was.
How can i check it ?
how can i continue the upgrading process without downloading all the stuff again?
is fc8 really a stable version?
thanks in advance
hector
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 10:31 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Distribution: Fedora, Kubuntu, RedHat, CentOS, SuSe
Posts: 1,288
Rep:
|
Yum should have cached everything it downloaded. If you were using the GUI to update, try it from a terminal instead. To do that, open a terminal and do the following:
If you have configured sudo:
If you have not configured sudo, or don't know what sudo is:
Code:
> su -
Password: ********* <-- NOTE: this is the root password, not your own.
[root@localhost ~]# yum update
.
.
.
[root@localhost ~]# exit
Yum should display any errors it encounters. If it does, post them back here.
HTH
Forrest
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 10:12 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 76
Original Poster
Rep:
|
i did a "yum update" command and yum ooes into a infinite loop processing this dependency:
Code:
--> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes.
--> Running transaction check
---> Package muine.i386 0:0.8.8-3.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: mono(glib-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(gdk-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(gtk-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(gdk-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(glib-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(gtk-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
---> Package perl-DateManip.noarch 0:5.44-4.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) for package: perl-DateManip
--> Processing Conflict: mesa-libGL conflicts xorg-x11-server-Xorg < 1.4.99.901-14
--> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes.
--> Running transaction check
---> Package muine.i386 0:0.8.8-3.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: mono(glib-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(gdk-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(gtk-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(gdk-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(glib-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(gtk-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
---> Package perl-DateManip.noarch 0:5.44-4.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) for package: perl-DateManip
--> Processing Conflict: mesa-libGL conflicts xorg-x11-server-Xorg < 1.4.99.901-14
--> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes.
--> Running transaction check
---> Package muine.i386 0:0.8.8-3.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: mono(glib-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(gdk-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(gtk-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(gdk-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(glib-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
--> Processing Dependency: mono(gtk-sharp) = 2.10.0.0 for package: muine
---> Package perl-DateManip.noarch 0:5.44-4.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) for package: perl-DateManip
--> Processing Conflict: mesa-libGL conflicts xorg-x11-server-Xorg < 1.4.99.901-14
when doing it with the GUI it gets an error after download :-(
any ideas ?
cheers,
hector
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 03:20 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 20
Rep:
|
upgrade YUM package ..
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 05:06 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: May 2006
Distribution: Ubuntu10.04, < fedora12
Posts: 347
Rep:
|
you could try updating everything but muine
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 10:54 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 76
Original Poster
Rep:
|
it looks like muine package is not installed:
Code:
yum remove muine
Setting up Remove Process
No Match for argument: muine
No Packages marked for removal
i was also loocking for muine with the GUI and it is not installed.
how can i upgrade yum package ?
cheers,
hector
|
|
|
06-12-2008, 06:57 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: May 2006
Distribution: Ubuntu10.04, < fedora12
Posts: 347
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hDUQUE
it looks like muine package is not installed:
|
Well that's odd I wonder why yum is trying to update it?
Sounds like there is a mix up somewhere.
you should be able to update yum (if it's not the latest version) by
yum update yum
Think there's a dash in there somewhere, maybe
yum -update yum
yes that looks better.
If that doesn't work try excluding muine from the update list, as long as there aren't any other anomalies, that should get you updated.
|
|
|
06-12-2008, 11:04 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 121
Rep:
|
thanks for answering ... i ve tried yesterday "yum update yum" but it falls into the same problem trying to update muine. At the moment I am out of town; i will try again by next monday and will post again ....
cheers,
hector
|
|
|
06-13-2008, 02:44 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: OSX
Posts: 248
Rep:
|
Just do "yum update yum --exclude=muine*" without the quotes
|
|
|
06-18-2008, 10:50 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 76
Original Poster
Rep:
|
hi guys. i continue getting problems
Code:
yum remove banshee
Setting up Remove Process
No Match for argument: banshee
No Packages marked for removal
[root@intel duque32]# yum remove muine
Setting up Remove Process
No Match for argument: muine
No Packages marked for removal
[root@intel duque32]# yum groupremove muine
Setting up Group Process
No group named muine exists
No packages to remove from groups
[root@intel duque32]# yum groupremove muine*
Setting up Group Process
No group named muine* exists
No packages to remove from groups
[root@intel duque32]# yum groupremove banshee*
Setting up Group Process
No group named banshee* exists
No packages to remove from groups
trying to update yum:
Code:
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
Package initscripts needs /sbin/pidof, this is not available.
Package redhat-lsb needs /sbin/pidof, this is not available.
tryin to instal pidof
Code:
yum install pidof
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
No package pidof available.
but pidof is there:
Code:
locate pidof
/etc/redhat-lsb/lsb_pidofproc
/sbin/pidof
/usr/share/man/man8/pidof.8.gz
tryng to update everything i get reference from frysk, even excluding frysk:
Code:
yum update --exclude=muine* --exclude=banshee* --exclude=perl-DateManip* --exclude=frysk*
...
---> Package pinentry.i386 0:0.7.4-5.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Conflict: mesa-libGL conflicts xorg-x11-server-Xorg < 1.4.99.901-14
--> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes.
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: libgcj.so.8rh for package: frysk
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libgcj.so.8rh is needed by package frysk
well .. there a lot of inconsistencies; do you think is better to make a freshly install ???
where can i get THE LAST fc8 image for installation?
cheers,
hector
|
|
|
06-18-2008, 02:26 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: OSX
Posts: 248
Rep:
|
Why don't you just install a fresh copy of FEDORA 9, rather than using Fedora 8?
Error: Missing Dependency: libgcj.so.8rh is needed by package frysk
yum install libgcj-4.3.0-8.i386
No package pidof available.
yum install sysvinit-tools-2.86-24.i386
It honestly looks like you have an incomplete installation of Fedora 8 right now or your rpm database is corrupted. You could attempt to go through and fix each of these issues but that might waste more time than its worth
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 05:13 AM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: May 2006
Distribution: Ubuntu10.04, < fedora12
Posts: 347
Rep:
|
Isn't there a way to get RPM to refresh it's database?
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 09:54 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Distribution: Fedora, Kubuntu, RedHat, CentOS, SuSe
Posts: 1,288
Rep:
|
You can do that with:
rpm --rebuilddb
HTH
Forrest
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 03:22 PM
|
#14
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: OSX
Posts: 248
Rep:
|
If you're going to attempt to rebuild your rpm database first back it up. Please do all of the following as the root user
cd /var/lib
mkdir rpm-backup
rsync -av ./rpm/. ./rpm-backup/.
Then remove the rpm lock files
rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db*
Now run the rpm rebuild
rpm --rebuilddb
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 06:56 PM
|
#15
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 76
Original Poster
Rep:
|
i did a rpm rebuild but the behavior continues as above ... :-(
no way ... i freshly installed fc9 and it looks fine .. i am updating all the stuff.
thank you guys ... i appreciate your advices and help.
cheers
hector
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|