LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-07-2006, 08:08 AM   #1
Daws
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 447

Rep: Reputation: 39
SOLVED:linux-kernel-headers: I think problem boils down to : Unknown Error 990


Right, today has not been a good day.

This morning, a seemingly innocent apt-get dist-upgrade has become a catastrophe. The more I tried to fix it, the worse things got.

Among the packages upgraded was linux-kernel-headers, this is the problem package. After upgrading a few packages it got to linux-kernel-headers. I cannot remember the exact error for linux-kernel-headers (so long ago...) but the remaining packages failed and it ended.

Code:
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
I'd seen this error before, didn't worry me too much. So I installed the other half-upgraded packages and nothing went wrong. I then tried to install linux-kernel-headers again using apt (redownloaded the package in case it was corrupted) and got a similar error.

In retrospect perhaps this is when I should have come here or elsewhere on the net for a solution...but no...

I decided to play with dpkg itself. dpkg reported that linux-kernel-headers was in a poor state and should be reinstalled which I tried... dpkg then segfaults. From this point on every command I type produces:

Code:
bash: command: Input/output error
even reboot and halt. eep...

I restart the computer (using the button, something I haven't had to do in years)

To my surprise everything seems to be working ok ... until I try to use apt-get or dpkg at which point I get the Input/output error again and have to reset. So I start browsing the dpkg man-page for a solution no luck. I try reinstalling again this time piping it through less:

Cannot remove file /usr/include/linux/version.h.dpkg.tmp : Unknown Error 990(or something similar, again my memory is hazy, I was so far past the point of no return...)

I took it upon myself to see what was going on

Code:
root:/# cd /usr/include
root:/usr/include# cd linux
bash: cd: linux: Unknown Error 990
That was an hour ago and I haven't had any luck since. I don't know whether this caused the problem with dpkg or I caused this problem by messing with dpkg.

Anyone got any ideas?

Edit: Just thought I'd say that everything important is backed up so any potentially fatal suggestions are welcome too. Cheers

Last edited by Daws; 09-07-2006 at 02:28 PM.
 
Old 09-07-2006, 09:47 AM   #2
Daws
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 447

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 39
Ok. Getting somewhere now. Came across this in the dmesg of knoppix

Code:
Filesystem "hdc5": XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2119 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.  Caller 0xe105a98d
 <e105a2c9> xfs_da_do_buf+0x225/0x86c [xfs]   <e105a98d> xfs_da_read_buf+0x25/0x2c [xfs]
 <e10615b2> xfs_dir2_data_make_free+0x1ce/0x390 [xfs]   <e105a98d> xfs_da_read_buf+0x25/0x2c [xfs]
 <e106528b> xfs_dir2_node_removename+0x267/0x4e4 [xfs]   <e106528b> xfs_dir2_node_removename+0x267/0x4e4 [xfs]
 <e105f2f6> xfs_dir2_removename+0x10a/0x110 [xfs]   <e1096371> kmem_zone_zalloc+0x21/0x48 [xfs]
 <e10937ef> xfs_remove+0x283/0x400 [xfs]   <c0176522> __link_path_walk+0x8a/0xff4
 <e109cc67> xfs_vn_unlink+0x1f/0x48 [xfs]   <e108fb67> xfs_access+0x2b/0x34 [xfs]
 <c0137ac2> debug_mutex_add_waiter+0x2e/0x94   <c032b57a> __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1a2/0x3f4
 <c01758a5> vfs_unlink+0x65/0xdc   <c032b5b8> __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1e0/0x3f4
 <c01758a5> vfs_unlink+0x65/0xdc   <c01758fb> vfs_unlink+0xbb/0xdc
 <c0177da8> do_unlinkat+0xac/0x134   <c010336b> syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Filesystem "hdc5": XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1150 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.  Caller 0xe109383d
 <e108a173> xfs_trans_cancel+0xef/0x110 [xfs]   <e109383d> xfs_remove+0x2d1/0x400 [xfs]
 <e109383d> xfs_remove+0x2d1/0x400 [xfs]   <c0176522> __link_path_walk+0x8a/0xff4
 <e109cc67> xfs_vn_unlink+0x1f/0x48 [xfs]   <e108fb67> xfs_access+0x2b/0x34 [xfs]
 <c0137ac2> debug_mutex_add_waiter+0x2e/0x94   <c032b57a> __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1a2/0x3f4
 <c01758a5> vfs_unlink+0x65/0xdc   <c032b5b8> __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1e0/0x3f4
 <c01758a5> vfs_unlink+0x65/0xdc   <c01758fb> vfs_unlink+0xbb/0xdc
 <c0177da8> do_unlinkat+0xac/0x134   <c010336b> syscall_call+0x7/0xb
xfs_force_shutdown(hdc5,0x8) called from line 1151 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.  Return address = 0xe108a18a
Filesystem "hdc5": Corruption of in-memory data detected.  Shutting down filesystem: hdc5
Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s)
"hdc5" is /usr, I am beginning to think this problem is bigger than dpkg. So can anyone help me "rectify the problem(s)"?
 
Old 09-07-2006, 02:28 PM   #3
Daws
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 447

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 39
Problem solved, turns out hdc5 was quite badly corrupted and had been for quite a while.

For future reference, if you ever run into Unknown Error 990:
Code:
xfs_repair /dev/hdc5
sorted the problem. (Eventually, I had to update xfs_progs on knoppix 5.01 because I ran into bug 631 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=631)
 
Old 09-07-2006, 02:29 PM   #4
farslayer
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Distribution: linuxdebian
Posts: 7,249
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 191Reputation: 191
This looks like it could be related....
what kernel version were/are you running ?
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#dir2
 
Old 09-07-2006, 02:48 PM   #5
Daws
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 447

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 39
Thanks farslayer, looks like this was the problem, I am running the stock debian 2.6.17 kernel. Looks like that partcular patch is not incorporated into debian's kernels yet or was only included recently.

It really was a very nasty bug, lost+found now contains hundreds of entries. I suppose it could have been worse, it only destroyed the linux includes and a few other easily replaced dirs.

Well let this be a solemn warning to anyone using xfs and a 2.6.17 (.6 or earlier) kernel.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
old linux kernel headers guysoft Debian 4 01-30-2006 06:34 AM
Kernel Headers Problem Daejavu Ubuntu 1 10-01-2005 06:18 AM
unknown error 990 nifflerX Linux - General 2 04-13-2005 09:42 AM
Error Compiling Linux-2.4.26 Headers AFI_Flame Linux From Scratch 3 06-04-2004 04:30 PM
Chapter 6: Kernel Headers Problem Obi Perrin Linux From Scratch 8 01-08-2003 02:44 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration