DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hey guys I decided to upgrade to sarge, from woody, but I have a slight problem. I run a dual boot machine right now, for the others in the house, Im not quite ready to unleash linux on them. however, apparently lilo has a new configuration with the version in sarge, and the installer wasn't nice enough to include Windows, as a boot option. Well no big deal right? I edited lilo.conf, and ran lilo, gave me a I'm not sure what you mean attitude . So I attempted to edit lilo.conf using the apparent new scheme from /proc/partitions, which is
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc
That appears to be my master HD, and the
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part*
where * as Im sure most of you would know is a number ie 1-6 this would indicate at least to my understanding the partition number. Well I ran lilo after configuring with this and recieved a fatal error, something about raid, I am not using raid. I can't use the former
/dev/hda
scheme due to the fact that I trid that and it of course tole me that it was wrong, well I rebooted, and now I can get into windows but linux can't find the root. I added the boot argument for root as both /dev/hda5, and /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5, and /ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5 and well I still get no root found. Anyone familiar with this lilo configuration type? I could really use some advice/assistance. thanks all in advance I appreciate it.
your part about the part* meaning a partition 1-6 is wrong. it would be 0-5. I have NEVER seen LILO with entries like that, on x86. If you have the Debian install cd boot with it and type rescbf24 and give us the output of cat /etc/fstab
Hey I can see what you're talking about re the 0-5, 1-6 thing, but I only figured it was 1-5 since I only had 3 partitions on the disc, hda1, hda5, and hda6 and What I had was part 1, part2, part 5, and part6 but thats of little right now. I can't boot into rescue mode due to the fact that the sarge cd I have doesn't have a rescue mode, but I did use woody cd with rescbf24 and got the old scheme of /dev/hda* with cat /etc/fstab, I also recieved the same scheme with cat /proc/partitions, well I know that the proc/partitions in sarge is different so I rebooted and ran the installer from sarge then mounted the partitions, and ran a shell from the installer, when I ran cat /etc/fstab I revieved the same output with the /dev/hda* scheme, with the appropriate FS ie in this case all EXT3, so then I ran cat /proc/partitions, this is where the partitions are in the other format of /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc. I hace done some research and found a post elswhere with the same situation, the response in that case was that the old naming would work as well, but in this case it isn't and when I change the root to the new scheme it talls me fatal raid_error, or something along those line I don't know what to do.
well I did a re install of Sarge and then just added other=/dev/hda1 as a windows option ran lilo, revieved the same error of /dev/ide/..... is /dev/hda then I rebooted well I can at least logon to both systems now thankgod, Im gonna try and see what else I can dig up on this thanks for the help.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.