LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-01-2004, 01:16 AM   #1
scheidel21
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: CT
Distribution: Debian 6+, CentOS 5+
Posts: 1,323

Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
lilo on sarge


Hey guys I decided to upgrade to sarge, from woody, but I have a slight problem. I run a dual boot machine right now, for the others in the house, Im not quite ready to unleash linux on them. however, apparently lilo has a new configuration with the version in sarge, and the installer wasn't nice enough to include Windows, as a boot option. Well no big deal right? I edited lilo.conf, and ran lilo, gave me a I'm not sure what you mean attitude . So I attempted to edit lilo.conf using the apparent new scheme from /proc/partitions, which is

/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc

That appears to be my master HD, and the

/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part*

where * as Im sure most of you would know is a number ie 1-6 this would indicate at least to my understanding the partition number. Well I ran lilo after configuring with this and recieved a fatal error, something about raid, I am not using raid. I can't use the former

/dev/hda

scheme due to the fact that I trid that and it of course tole me that it was wrong, well I rebooted, and now I can get into windows but linux can't find the root. I added the boot argument for root as both /dev/hda5, and /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5, and /ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5 and well I still get no root found. Anyone familiar with this lilo configuration type? I could really use some advice/assistance. thanks all in advance I appreciate it.



--Alex
 
Old 01-01-2004, 04:42 PM   #2
llamakc
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Debian & Ubuntu
Posts: 402

Rep: Reputation: 31
your part about the part* meaning a partition 1-6 is wrong. it would be 0-5. I have NEVER seen LILO with entries like that, on x86. If you have the Debian install cd boot with it and type rescbf24 and give us the output of cat /etc/fstab
 
Old 01-01-2004, 07:15 PM   #3
scheidel21
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: CT
Distribution: Debian 6+, CentOS 5+
Posts: 1,323

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
Hey I can see what you're talking about re the 0-5, 1-6 thing, but I only figured it was 1-5 since I only had 3 partitions on the disc, hda1, hda5, and hda6 and What I had was part 1, part2, part 5, and part6 but thats of little right now. I can't boot into rescue mode due to the fact that the sarge cd I have doesn't have a rescue mode, but I did use woody cd with rescbf24 and got the old scheme of /dev/hda* with cat /etc/fstab, I also recieved the same scheme with cat /proc/partitions, well I know that the proc/partitions in sarge is different so I rebooted and ran the installer from sarge then mounted the partitions, and ran a shell from the installer, when I ran cat /etc/fstab I revieved the same output with the /dev/hda* scheme, with the appropriate FS ie in this case all EXT3, so then I ran cat /proc/partitions, this is where the partitions are in the other format of /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc. I hace done some research and found a post elswhere with the same situation, the response in that case was that the old naming would work as well, but in this case it isn't and when I change the root to the new scheme it talls me fatal raid_error, or something along those line I don't know what to do.

-Alex
 
Old 01-02-2004, 12:49 AM   #4
scheidel21
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: CT
Distribution: Debian 6+, CentOS 5+
Posts: 1,323

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
well I did a re install of Sarge and then just added other=/dev/hda1 as a windows option ran lilo, revieved the same error of /dev/ide/..... is /dev/hda then I rebooted well I can at least logon to both systems now thankgod, Im gonna try and see what else I can dig up on this thanks for the help.

-Alex
 
Old 01-02-2004, 12:51 AM   #5
scheidel21
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: CT
Distribution: Debian 6+, CentOS 5+
Posts: 1,323

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
PS I love Sarge already! despite a few ideosynchrosies, it's great
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where Sarge Needs Work (some questions too) + Where Sarge Rocks out loud too. ilyanep Debian 6 09-13-2004 05:36 PM
sarge net installer and lilo, possible? deNiro Debian 3 06-17-2004 07:14 AM
Lilo lost, Install disk failing to restore Lilo on dual boot? Dobie Linux - Newbie 2 05-05-2004 05:00 PM
sarge with slack dualboot, lilo mbr preserved? flipper333 Debian 4 04-05-2004 02:49 PM
LILO Hangs at Boot After Sarge Upgrade oxleyk Debian 1 11-28-2003 05:48 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration