DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It's not a bug: Debian reports Lenny or Sid as lenny/sid. I'm not sure why, but it does. (If I had to guess why, I would say that it's because Debian's focus is on Stable so much that everything else gets lumped together. That may be completely bogus.)
I hope you get this before you go and get raped by the Debian devs. This is one of those times when RTFM (or in this case the FAQ) really works. For those who do not use a Debian system or can't be bothered (shame on you!!!) here is the relevant part of /usr/share/doc/base-files/FAQ:
Quote:
Q. I upgraded my system to the testing distribution and now my /etc/issue says "lenny/sid". Should it not read "lenny" or "testing"?
Q. I upgraded my system to the unstable distribution and now my /etc/issue says "lenny/sid". Should it not read "sid" or "unstable"?
A. You obviously do not understand how the testing distribution works.
Packages uploaded for unstable reach testing after ten days, provided they are built for every released architecture, have no RC-bugs and their dependencies may be met in testing. You should consider the testing and unstable distributions as two sides of the same coin.
Since the base-files package in testing was initially uploaded for unstable, the only sensible /etc/issue to have is one that is both valid for testing and unstable, hence "lenny/sid" (or whatever is appropriate).
Here is something else I always wondered about when they first changed it.
Quote:
Q. Why "lenny/sid" and not "testing/unstable" as usual?
A. The codename is a little bit more informative, as the meaning of "testing" changes over time.
... and now I know. TBH I was hoping for an explanation involving more explosions and a car chase. Oh well.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.