LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2007, 09:17 AM   #31
crashmeister
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541

Rep: Reputation: 47

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomermory
Now I've got another problem to add to my growing catalogue of irritations: Openoffice won't start! It did yesterday! I'm downloading the new version right now to see if I can install it from source. Hmmm...something tells me I'm going to be here a while!
Oh - you will if you really try that

Don't forget to have enough disc space - last time I checked OO needed about 2 - 3 gig temp space to compile.
 
Old 06-07-2007, 09:23 AM   #32
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian Stable
Posts: 2,546
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomermory
The partition procedure was also a little scary, as I didn't understand all the details I had to give. Indeed, I ended up wiping off a partition I wanted to keep (which I had backed up, fortunately!) and then I found that my root partition was smaller than I wanted.
Debian's installer provides all sorts of warnings and asks for confirmation before deleting any partitions or data. I find it hard to imagine circumstances where someone could accidentally wipe out a partition he wanted to keep.

Quote:
Openoffice won't start! It did yesterday! I'm downloading the new version right now to see if I can install it from source. Hmmm...something tells me I'm going to be here a while!
Umm...don't. What version of Debian are you using, anyway? If you're using Debian Stable, then nothing should have changed between yesterday and today. But in any case you should NOT install ANYTHING from source, unless you have a specific reason to do so. It seems to me that you just want versions that work, in which case installing things from source is going to overall cause more problems than they solve.

It seems like you've seriously screwed up your Debian install. Since it's only been a few days, I suggest you start over and use this utility to install the non-free stuff:

http://www.howtoforge.com/the_perfec...debian_etch_p5

That web page describes using a utility called "Automatix2". It's basically a collection of various install scripts with a graphical interface. I think it was originally developed for Ubuntu, and is an example of how improvements in Ubuntu or Debian filter to the other. In any case, it's an example of how you can take advantage of someone else figuring out how to get all the stuff you want installed installed.
 
Old 06-07-2007, 10:30 AM   #33
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 62
For me, Automatix is a waste of time, and definitely reflects a non-Debian attitude. You wanted to move from Ubuntu to Debian to learn, so learn. You will not regret it in the end, but I sympathize with the frustrations you are experiencing right now.

Are you running pure Etch? You should be right now until you get the system stabilized. Then if you want to move to Testing or a mixed system of some sort, you can do it from a solid base. Attempting to compile something as complicated as OpenOffice is certain to only increase your frustration.
 
Old 06-07-2007, 01:06 PM   #34
Tomermory
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Amiens, France
Distribution: Debian Etch,
Posts: 181

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thanks for your support, guys. Well, I took a deep breath and re-installed. This time it was a breeze - including the partitioner. I don't know what I did last time: I don't know how I lost that partition. I think I was too tired, I shouldn't have started out that day - I knew I was exhausted. However, I'm not going back on what I said earlier. A bit more help for the newbies would be appreciated I think.
This time, the configuration process took around an hour. Seems I have learned, after all! Thanks for the link IsaadKuo - very useful. I avoided using Automatix, as I agree with what you say, rickh. But it did give me that little push in the right direction to help me through the pain barrier. Now all I have to do is the graphics card and I should be away. Oh, and if anyone knows how I can get Xsane to work as a normal user rather than root, that would be great.
 
Old 06-07-2007, 03:19 PM   #35
Tomermory
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Amiens, France
Distribution: Debian Etch,
Posts: 181

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
OK - that's it. Everything's working properly. I've now got a fully operational Debian. Thanks once again for all your help.
 
Old 06-07-2007, 03:29 PM   #36
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian Stable
Posts: 2,546
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
For me, Automatix is a waste of time, and definitely reflects a non-Debian attitude.
I figure that if you're installing non-Free stuff, you're already going with a "non-Debian attitude". Might as well do it the quick and easy way.

I've never actually used Automatix on any of my own systems. Generally, I feel that if it isn't Free, then I don't need it. Ironically, I use mostly Ati cards rather than nVidia cards because the open source ati drivers are so much more functional than the open source nv drivers.

For my friends and family, it's different. They don't want to ask why <insert X> doesn't work, and I prefer to avoid it in the first place.
 
Old 06-15-2007, 05:19 PM   #37
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,657

Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomermory
Hi

I'm thinking of swithing from Ubuntu to Debian. I have wanted to do this for a long time, but my question is, is it really worth it? What will Debian do for me that Ubuntu doesn't? After all, I have found in Ubuntu an OS that is stable and easy to configure, so is it worth my taking time to install Debian and put in the extra effort to learn a new OS? What does Debian do that Ubuntu doesn't do? I had Suse on my computer in the past and got very frustrated with how slow it was to download programmes and do system updates etc. This isn't a problem in Ubuntu - is Debian just as fast as Ubuntu on this front? How about NVIDIA graphics card drivers? This caused me a real headache in Suse, but has been no trouble at all in Ubuntu. How is it with Debian? Debian has a reputation for being complicated - although Etch is apparently considerably simpler than older versions. Is this so? Is Debian significantly more complicated than other distributions, and does Ubuntu in any way prepare you for Debian?

Thanks for your help,

James
You are about to make the right jump from , you learned enough with Ubuntu to become a Pro : hence,
Install Debian and with years, you will discover daily it was the high time to install the legend, Debian !
 
Old 06-15-2007, 05:21 PM   #38
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,657

Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaacKuo
...

Please forget about Automatix, it's not Debian. It'll damage more than helping you.

(And Ubuntu is the same story, you should favour Debian)

Last edited by Xeratul; 06-15-2007 at 05:25 PM.
 
Old 06-16-2007, 05:13 AM   #39
Nathanael
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Distribution: debian, gentoo, os x (darwin), ubuntu
Posts: 940

Rep: Reputation: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeratul

Please forget about Automatix it's not Debian.
debian is not the only system out there, just because you are not familiar or comfortable with them does not mean others should forget them.
using debian over ubuntu in no way defines anybody a 'pro'... believing on is a pro just because of the fact that one is using debian only proves the opposite!

perhaps read this post, it's in the same thread http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...61#post2770861
particularly the part that said
'You should probably choose something else if:'
'You want to run Debian because "it is cool."'


Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeratul
It'll damage more than helping you.
the only thing that is damaging is

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeratul
(And Ubuntu is the same story, you should favour Debian)
how about letting others decide what they want to favour?

i bet there are enough systems that will bust your mind just by installing :-)
 
Old 06-16-2007, 07:39 PM   #40
BillyGalbreath
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Houston Texas
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 379

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathanael
i bet there are enough systems that will bust your mind just by installing :-)
BSD, Gentoo, and Slackware all busted my mind the first few times after using Debian for 3 years! lol!
 
Old 06-18-2007, 05:59 AM   #41
Tomermory
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Amiens, France
Distribution: Debian Etch,
Posts: 181

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
how about letting others decide what they want to favour?
Yes, I agree with this. I think that one of the advantages that Linux has over other operating systems, especially Windows, is the massive choice it presents. Linux has something for everyone. Some people, indeed most of them, just want their computer to work. They use it to send emails, store their photos and music, perhaps play games and so on. Linux must cater for these people and, thanks to distributions like Ubuntu and Mandriva, it does. I simply don't think that it's useful to critise the decision to use these, "easier", choices. My decision to move to Debian wasn't brought about through a superiority complex, but because I wanted to learn more about Linux and to take my final decision about which flavour I wanted after having tried several of them. However, I also wanted to support Debian because the developers go to a hell of a lot of work to create a stable, secure system, and I wanted to use the product that they created rather than a derived one such as Ubuntu. But Ubuntu is great. It never went wrong while I was using it, and it was so easy to configure and actually get working. It may not be as powerful as Debian, but thanks to distributions like this, Linux, as well as other *nix distributions like BSD, might well be the future of computing. When you see the power that computers have over our lives these days, this can only be a very good thing, and a big victory for democracy all over the world.
 
Old 06-19-2007, 12:13 PM   #42
infoseeker
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: South Africa
Distribution: Debian Squeeze KDE version
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
I have read all the pros and cons of a Debian installation and I have been convinced that I would like to give it a go, but my concern is that the mirrors all show that there are 4 DVD's, without listing the contents of each, or can an installation be done by downloading only the first DVD iso. Comments would be appreciated.

Where I live downloading 4 DVD's would be practically impossible and would take days.

Thanks
 
Old 06-19-2007, 12:23 PM   #43
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian Stable
Posts: 2,546
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465
Most of us who use Debian don't download any of the DVDs, but instead use a "netinstall" that downloads packages during the installation.

The Debian DVDs are a set of ALL software packages. Debian's software repository is more comprehensive than any other, so naturally it's huge. But you'll only actually use a tiny fraction of those software packages, which is why the netinstall option is by far the most popular.

If your internet connection speed is only so-so, then you might want to download the first DVD iso. Probably everything you'll want is in the first disc. If not, then the other packages (if any) will be downloaded over the internet.
 
Old 06-19-2007, 12:25 PM   #44
infoseeker
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: South Africa
Distribution: Debian Squeeze KDE version
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Probably everything you'll want is in the first disc
Thats a relief . Thanks
 
Old 06-20-2007, 12:11 AM   #45
Tomermory
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Amiens, France
Distribution: Debian Etch,
Posts: 181

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Don't forget to take the DVDs off your installation media list, though (Desktop, Administration, Software Properties).
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is whole this really worth it RaiL General 32 05-05-2010 01:17 PM
is debian worth trying? agryan Debian 19 06-01-2005 01:38 AM
is 9.1 worth it? speel SUSE / openSUSE 5 12-28-2004 07:14 PM
is it worth? sopiaz57 Linux - Distributions 1 04-13-2003 10:05 PM
how much would this be worth? TeRG General 3 04-22-2002 04:27 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration