[SOLVED] how to setup ice weasel upgrades in squeeze
DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hello guys, i am currently running squeeze, but would like to have ice weasel upgrade to the latest version and to have it upgrade to each later version as they come out. How do i go about setting this up?
hello caravel, just a question bout the sight you listed. if i select release, will i be stuck with the curtent relies at that time, or will it upgrade when use aptitude safe-upgrade
squeeze-release is always the latest stable, I think the same goes for the iceweasel in backports - it's essentially a mirror and is from the same official iceweasel maintainer anyway. If you add backports you will need to upgrade by doing "aptitude -t squeeze-backports install iceweasel", if you add the mozilla repo (squeeze-release) instead it should just keep iceweasel up to date in the course of your normal updates.
Only for understand what happen, why the priority of the mozilla.debian.net repo is higher than the official stable repo and the backports repo?
Why the backport repo priority is lower than stable repo?
Which configuration file/other decide the priority of the repo?
I thought it depended by the package version number but packages in backport have higher version. Despite this I have to force the use with -t option.
With the mozilla repo I haven't to use the -t but automatically updates with normal updates ... Why?
If you add the mozilla repo it's assumed that you want the iceweasel packages there, hence the default priority is used.
If you add the squeeze-backports repo then it's assumed that you will not be installing every package and will not want your system to automatically upgrade to backports packages (backports is not intended as a full distribution and all packages are not designed to be installed together), so it uses a priority of 1 (as does experimental).
From memory, the default release priority is set in the release file - i.e. NotAutomatic: yes/no. Yes is 1 and no is 500 (default for stable, testing and unstable). If you want anything else (-1 to 1001), configured for either a release or individual packages, you have to override it through /etc/apt/preferences and set it up yourself.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.