LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch
User Name
Password
Arch This Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-21-2005, 12:04 AM   #1
celejar
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: New York
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 185

Rep: Reputation: 30
Arch on AMD k6 3D


I'd like to try Arch (I'm currently running Debian 3.0r2) but my box is an AMD k6 3D and the website says that the K6 isn't supported (there is stuff about outdated / unmantained i586 versions). Am I out of luck?
 
Old 03-21-2005, 02:30 AM   #2
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
That's my understanding. AFAIK, the 586 version isn't *dead* or anything - just not available now but may be at some point. So I'd say you were out of luck for now. You could stick with Debian or try something like Slack.
 
Old 03-21-2005, 10:36 AM   #3
DeusExLinux
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Tampa, Fl
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 648

Rep: Reputation: 30
Arch does only come in the i686 version. They have a problem keeping devs for the i586 version.

Slack might be good, vector should work, but if you want something that is going to come close to arch, I'd say arch or gentoo (gentoo would def work, but is a pain sometimes on slower hardware)
 
Old 03-22-2005, 10:45 AM   #4
halo14
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Surprise, AZ
Distribution: Debian | CentOS | Arch
Posts: 1,103

Rep: Reputation: 45
I was under the impression that a K6 was an i686 processor??? that's very surprising that it's not... weren't the standard athlons a K6?? I have an original Athlon 900 MHz that I was one of the first boxes I tried arch on..before I was confortable enough to understand it... but it did install well enough... :/
 
Old 03-22-2005, 02:35 PM   #5
DeusExLinux
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Tampa, Fl
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 648

Rep: Reputation: 30
As far as I know it's based off the i586, but I could be wrong.. I googled it with no help (but I saw some people saying to compile programs on a k6 with a march=i586 flag.... so, take that for whats it worth)
 
Old 03-22-2005, 06:48 PM   #6
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Yeah, I've got a K6 and it's a 586 equivalent.
 
Old 03-23-2005, 05:01 PM   #7
celejar
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: New York
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 185

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thanks everyone. I don't know enough about chip architectures to know whether the k6 is an i586 or i686, but as I mentioned the docs on the website state explicitly that the k6 isn't supported. I won't try gentoo if it won't work well on old hardware (475 MHz processor, 186 MB ram, 8 GB hdd). I suppose I'll keep debian or try slackware. I probably should switch to debian sarge (from woody) since woody's (3.0r2) libraries and other things are really outdated.
 
Old 03-23-2005, 10:29 PM   #8
DeusExLinux
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Tampa, Fl
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 648

Rep: Reputation: 30
gentoo will work great on that older hardware, it will just take forever to compile all of your software... and I mean forever.. it took me 11 hours to compile KDE on a 2.4 GHZ

Debian is another solid choice.
 
Old 03-24-2005, 12:41 AM   #9
celejar
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: New York
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 185

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thanks for the advice. Big, rough compiles are a problem for me; they often break with sig11 (and sig4). I think it's a hardware problem (see http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/).
 
Old 03-24-2005, 07:39 AM   #10
halo14
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Surprise, AZ
Distribution: Debian | CentOS | Arch
Posts: 1,103

Rep: Reputation: 45
I would say to go with VectorLinux if you want something that will be decently fast. I have used it on a number of computers all the way down to a Pentium MMX 200MHz with 32MB RAM... good luck!
 
Old 03-24-2005, 05:43 PM   #11
cs-cam
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,545

Rep: Reputation: 57
I can't remember where I read it but apparently a newer K6 is i686 equivilant. The older ones are close, just missing a couple of instructions but you know, that's all it takes. If you don't know when your chip was manufactured then maybe just have a go at installing it, if it works yippee and if it doesn't what have you lost?
 
Old 03-25-2005, 04:00 PM   #12
celejar
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: New York
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 185

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thanks, I'll check out vector. I don't know if I want to experiment with arch since I have a dialup connection and getting isos is a pain.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Opteron or AMD 64 dual core difference? GATTACA Linux - Hardware 1 10-22-2005 09:46 PM
Arch AGilley007 Arch 12 07-30-2004 02:27 PM
AMD 64 bit vs Dual AMD MP 2400+ GATTACA Linux - Hardware 2 06-02-2004 04:54 PM
What is Arch like? iq_n0ob Arch 5 12-03-2003 02:34 PM
Arch .6? gsibble Arch 1 11-24-2003 09:28 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration