LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu
User Name
Password
Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-13-2007, 11:25 AM   #1
dickgregory
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Distribution: Arch, PCLinuxOS, Mint
Posts: 257

Rep: Reputation: 34
Should I wait for 7.04


I want to set up a new server and I have been waiting for the final release of Feisty Fawn. However I have some time this weekend and would like to complete it since it will be a while before I can devote the time I might need.

So my question is, if I get the beta version and install it, how easy is it to make sure I have everything up to date when it comes out in about a week?

Would it be better to get the beta or the snapshot version?
 
Old 04-13-2007, 11:32 AM   #2
tredegar
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora38
Posts: 6,147

Rep: Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435
If you want a server, you'll want something that's as reliable and bug-free as possible: I'd recommend 6.06.1LTS
"LTS" is Long Term Support - you might appreciate this for a server!
 
Old 04-13-2007, 11:50 AM   #3
dickgregory
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Distribution: Arch, PCLinuxOS, Mint
Posts: 257

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 34
Thanks for the suggestion. I guess since I won't be using it for a normal desktop I won't need the most recent gui stuff. If I install 6.06LTS will it bring it up to date as part of the install?

Does 6.06 have the same specialized choices for installing a server as 7.04?
 
Old 04-13-2007, 04:27 PM   #4
tredegar
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora38
Posts: 6,147

Rep: Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435
Quote:
will it bring it up to date as part of the install?
Just install it. I chose kubuntu 6.06.1, because I like KDE (and the idea of LTS). The CLI works just fine too.
You boot from the CD, and click "Install". Once installed, boot from your HDD. KDE puts an icon on the panel to indicate updates are available. Click it and the updates will be applied. You can also do all this from the CLI ("apt-get" etc.)

Quote:
"Does 6.06 have the same specialized choices for installing a server as 7.04?"
I do not know what "specialized choices" you are referring to, or require. But you could just try it (6.06) - it will probably do what you need. If not, you can always come back here and ask advice about setting things up.
 
Old 04-13-2007, 08:17 PM   #5
fragos
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Fresno CA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10
Posts: 1,466

Rep: Reputation: 51
If you install 7.04 you will be offered all the updates necessary to make it a released version. Note that even a fully updated 6.06 LTS will have package versions associated with its original release. If the server will be used in a production environment at a business you may wish to be conservative and use 6.06 LTS. If however the server is for personal use I'd go for 7.04 without hesitation. At any rate in a business any server you install should go through an extensive testing process before production use.
 
Old 04-15-2007, 01:44 PM   #6
dickgregory
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Distribution: Arch, PCLinuxOS, Mint
Posts: 257

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 34
Thanks. This installation is really just my own stuff plus I will be serving a small website that no one will really be depending on. Eventually I plan on expanding this shoestring operation into a business to provide me with a little income after my retirement in about 7 years.

I went ahead and installed 7.04 beta and let it do about a 2 hour update. From what I'm told here, when the release comes out, updates at that time will give me the same product as if I install the release. Am I correct?
 
Old 04-15-2007, 02:17 PM   #7
fragos
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Fresno CA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10
Posts: 1,466

Rep: Reputation: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by dickgregory
Thanks. This installation is really just my own stuff plus I will be serving a small website that no one will really be depending on. Eventually I plan on expanding this shoestring operation into a business to provide me with a little income after my retirement in about 7 years.

I went ahead and installed 7.04 beta and let it do about a 2 hour update. From what I'm told here, when the release comes out, updates at that time will give me the same product as if I install the release. Am I correct?
Correct you are. Normal updates will get us there without additional installs.
 
Old 04-15-2007, 02:23 PM   #8
dickgregory
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Distribution: Arch, PCLinuxOS, Mint
Posts: 257

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 34
Thanks fragos.It looks like I am up and going for now at least.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
about wait ringerxyz Programming 1 02-02-2005 12:00 AM
Should I get 9.2 or wait out for 10? eBopBob Mandriva 10 03-10-2004 09:49 PM
9.2 or better wait for 10? tijs Mandriva 4 02-07-2004 12:11 PM
Can't wait!!! nny0000 Programming 2 01-17-2004 04:18 AM
I cant wait TazLinux General 6 05-31-2003 08:00 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration