Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
04-13-2007, 11:25 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Distribution: Arch, PCLinuxOS, Mint
Posts: 257
Rep:
|
Should I wait for 7.04
I want to set up a new server and I have been waiting for the final release of Feisty Fawn. However I have some time this weekend and would like to complete it since it will be a while before I can devote the time I might need.
So my question is, if I get the beta version and install it, how easy is it to make sure I have everything up to date when it comes out in about a week?
Would it be better to get the beta or the snapshot version?
|
|
|
04-13-2007, 11:32 AM
|
#2
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora40
Posts: 6,156
|
If you want a server, you'll want something that's as reliable and bug-free as possible: I'd recommend 6.06.1LTS
"LTS" is Long Term Support - you might appreciate this for a server!
|
|
|
04-13-2007, 11:50 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Distribution: Arch, PCLinuxOS, Mint
Posts: 257
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for the suggestion. I guess since I won't be using it for a normal desktop I won't need the most recent gui stuff. If I install 6.06LTS will it bring it up to date as part of the install?
Does 6.06 have the same specialized choices for installing a server as 7.04?
|
|
|
04-13-2007, 04:27 PM
|
#4
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora40
Posts: 6,156
|
Quote:
will it bring it up to date as part of the install?
|
Just install it. I chose kubuntu 6.06.1, because I like KDE (and the idea of LTS). The CLI works just fine too.
You boot from the CD, and click "Install". Once installed, boot from your HDD. KDE puts an icon on the panel to indicate updates are available. Click it and the updates will be applied. You can also do all this from the CLI ("apt-get" etc.)
Quote:
"Does 6.06 have the same specialized choices for installing a server as 7.04?"
|
I do not know what "specialized choices" you are referring to, or require. But you could just try it (6.06) - it will probably do what you need. If not, you can always come back here and ask advice about setting things up.
|
|
|
04-13-2007, 08:17 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Fresno CA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10
Posts: 1,466
Rep:
|
If you install 7.04 you will be offered all the updates necessary to make it a released version. Note that even a fully updated 6.06 LTS will have package versions associated with its original release. If the server will be used in a production environment at a business you may wish to be conservative and use 6.06 LTS. If however the server is for personal use I'd go for 7.04 without hesitation. At any rate in a business any server you install should go through an extensive testing process before production use.
|
|
|
04-15-2007, 01:44 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Distribution: Arch, PCLinuxOS, Mint
Posts: 257
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks. This installation is really just my own stuff plus I will be serving a small website that no one will really be depending on. Eventually I plan on expanding this shoestring operation into a business to provide me with a little income after my retirement in about 7 years.
I went ahead and installed 7.04 beta and let it do about a 2 hour update. From what I'm told here, when the release comes out, updates at that time will give me the same product as if I install the release. Am I correct?
|
|
|
04-15-2007, 02:17 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Fresno CA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10
Posts: 1,466
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dickgregory
Thanks. This installation is really just my own stuff plus I will be serving a small website that no one will really be depending on. Eventually I plan on expanding this shoestring operation into a business to provide me with a little income after my retirement in about 7 years.
I went ahead and installed 7.04 beta and let it do about a 2 hour update. From what I'm told here, when the release comes out, updates at that time will give me the same product as if I install the release. Am I correct?
|
Correct you are. Normal updates will get us there without additional installs.
|
|
|
04-15-2007, 02:23 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Distribution: Arch, PCLinuxOS, Mint
Posts: 257
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks fragos.It looks like I am up and going for now at least.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|