LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu
User Name
Password
Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-14-2007, 03:10 PM   #16
Duck2006
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Distribution: Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron LST
Posts: 346

Rep: Reputation: 33

Quote:
Wait a minute, doesn't Feisty reference all hard drives as sd now, whether they are PATA or SATA? Wouldn't that mean that your SATA disk is not sda at all but perhaps sdc?
Yes Feisty see's all hard drives as sd
 
Old 05-14-2007, 03:28 PM   #17
Hern_28
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: North Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 12.0, Gentoo, LFS, Debian, Kubuntu.
Posts: 906

Rep: Reputation: 38
FInd.

Would recommend using find /boot/vmlinuz-etc.

This will give you a map to double check the paths and entries in case grub is doing something wierd and it will verify your device and file location (or grubs ability to locate it).
 
Old 05-14-2007, 03:41 PM   #18
jay73
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
A simple fdisk -l from the Feisty liveCD may be instructive, too.
 
Old 05-15-2007, 12:11 PM   #19
Linunix
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 58

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
The problem is solved. As somebody surmised, hd2 was not referring to sda but to hdb - in contradiction to the mapping defined in "device.map". The resolution is that executing GRUB takes reference into BIOS defined order of hard disk boot sequence (and names hd0 .. hdx according to that). It seemingly ignores ANY definitions in device.map!

In an interesting side note, Ubuntu installation rendered the *false* naming of "hd2,4" in my first installation. It rendered the same naming (hd2,4) also in my last installation (which was the third), but meanwhile I had changed the HDD ordering tin BIOS to match that naming in GRUB parlance.

First of all, I must hold on to my assumption that "guessworking" has a lot to do with the actual practice encountered here.

Second, I conclude the following:

A) GRUB has a severe problem. It seemingly does not respect user settings which were performed according to GRUB's own definitions. Moreover I have seen wild fantasy disk naming in GRUB-produced device.map settings. BUGS!

B) Ubuntu also has a problem. The disk order it assumes for GRUB names is not necessarily identical with what GRUB finds out during startup execution. This may (or may not) have to do with disk partitioning performed during installation and changing boot disk order in the BIOS, for what ever reason.

Both problems I value serious and they should be solved asap. Thanks to the people here asking indefatigable, penetrative questions!
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
stupid grub boot-screen question ight8 Linux - Software 3 11-03-2006 03:13 AM
Stupid, stupid question; I lost Klaptop. :( Surfrider Slackware 2 08-31-2005 09:12 PM
Big stupid Bad Mistake... GRUB dasz Linux - Software 7 12-09-2004 09:35 AM
Stupid Dumb Stupid Question... drigz Linux - Software 3 09-23-2004 03:09 PM
stupid grub! tumnus Linux - General 4 04-28-2002 09:23 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration