Differences (content) between download and boxed SUSE
SUSE / openSUSEThis Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Differences (content) between download and boxed SUSE
I'm trying to evaluate whether SuSE will work for me. I started trying the download version ('9.1 free'), but it took almost 12 hours on a high speed line, so I went and bought the boxed 9.2 'pro' version at the store. Money is not the issue, neither is support at this point. So this got me wondering ... what are the actual, 'content' differences between the download version(s) and the boxed version? And, for that matter, the 'Enterprise' version too - I downloaded the 6 ISO's for the Enterprise Edition evaluation version but again, in the interest of time, it was quicker to buy the boxed set.
I understand that the 'personal' version is limited, but what differences are there between 9.1 free and 9.2 professional, other than 9.1->9.2 changes, and support issues? Assuming 9.2 becomes available as a 'free' (ftp) download soon, what then will the differences be between the d/l and the box version? Are there kernel differences, app differences, or what?
My ultimate goal is to load Oracle products, and they only 'certify' the Enterprise versions. But for test purposes, I'm hoping I can get away with installing the 'pro' (or 'free') version. For production/customers, of course, they would be buying the Enterprise version simply due to support issues.
Ooh, Oracle (I work for Oracle...). I believe that the only differences between the bought version, and the downloaded version is the applications that come with it. There are more 3rd party apps with the store bought version (ones that you aren't suppossed to get for free). I have never downloaded a version of SuSE, so I cannot say for sure, but that's what I have heard multiple times.
Distribution: Mandrake 10.1 Official / SuSE 10.0 64-Bit / Mandriva 2005 LE
Posts: 53
Rep:
I agree with these guys
Just to add to the already good comments, the downloaded version of SuSE (9.1 Personal) comes complete, but without some of the "exras" as well as many of the manufacturer's drivers, programs, and extra utilities. In addition, you can only boot to KDE. Gnome and others do not work as there is no integrated desktop loader.
SuSE 9.2 Professional has all of the options and lots of extras, including the most up-to-date versions of many apps.... Evolution, KDE, and Firefox (at the time of release). It has been posted here that you could go to the FTP server and download everything you need to "upgrade" the downloaded 9.1 Personal to make it a full system. I guess that the choice is in what you want your box to do and how much configuring you want to get involved in...............
I use 9.1 ftp for some time and can log in windowsmaker, gnome xfce and more ...
I quickly evaluate SLES 9 compared to 9.1 and was able to install fully HP/Compaq management tools and drivers aimed specificaly at SLES 9, on 9.1 ftp with quite nothing but changing the file /etc/SuSERelease. Hardware is an Proliant ML350 2.8 P4 Xeon with raid controler ...
looked at the respective stock kernels compile options and they were the same except for two things un-important like sound support ...
The thing with SLES seems to be that you have to pay for one year specific security updates ...
9.2 won't have a personal version. So, you'd really be comparing 9.1 Pro, 9.2 Pro and the FTP version of both.
Well, we don't know if there will be an FTP version of 9.2 Pro yet. But, I loaded FTP 9.1 Pro and seemed to get everything that everyone who bought 9.1 Pro got. I now have 9.2 Pro 5 cds. Again, it seems exactly the same at 9.1 Pro FTP, but with newer packages, of course.
Except for one main and big difference. Tuxracer crept at a snail's pace on 9.1 and now flies on 9.2. I think SuSE now uses the same version as Fedora does. *That's* worth going to your store and buying 9.2 Pro right now, alone!
... the downloaded version of SuSE (9.1 Personal) comes complete, but ...
And Rory said ...
Quote:
... But, I loaded FTP 9.1 Pro and seemed to get everything ...
When I go to download, the only name I see is '9.1 Free' - not 9.1 Personal, or 9.1 Pro.
So this gets back to the root of my question ... is the download of 9.1 the personal version or the professional version?
From reviews I've read, the Personal version (9.2, at least) is very limited. I'm guessing that '9.1 Free' is more equivalent to the 'Pro' version, but that's what I'm trying to verify. I downloaded the whole thing to my local ftp server, and it was about 7 gigs, which is pretty big ...
So this gets back to the root of my question ... is the download of 9.1 the personal version or the professional version?
If you download an ISO, it's the Personal-version (reduced by a lot of packages) or an illegal rip of the original CD's. If you install via FTP or download the installation directory from the SuSE servers, you have a Professional-version minus commercial packages, as eescar said already (I don't know which packages are affected, but I never missed any of them).
My ultimate goal is to load an Oracle product. Oracle's website (and Suse's) both suggest that you need Suse Enterprise Edition to run Oracle; however, I'm pretty sure this is simply because they (Oracle) want to only support a limited set of linux flavors, and by picking RH Enterprise and Suse Enterprise, they are picking predictable versions. I can't imagine oracle won't actually load on (eg) professional - but I'm testing that now and will soon find out!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.