LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-14-2016, 05:51 PM   #16
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,058

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Sometimes I would like to be a pope. But that lasts only 27'39".

PS. This reminds me what wrote Cioran: "S'il y a quelqu'un qui doit tout à Bach, c'est bien Dieu."

Yes, this is off topic. But is there one?

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 01-14-2016 at 06:10 PM.
 
Old 01-14-2016, 06:02 PM   #17
Sylvester Ink
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 112

Rep: Reputation: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by enorbet View Post
On a purely pragmatic level I'd like to ask what would be the downside of disabling PulseAudio? In my case, at least in the past, it has not played nicely with Jack which is extremely important to me as I often use my PC as a DAW. I don't foresee ever requiring BlueZ, so is that the extent of the loss?
How does it work out if you reconfigure pulseaudio as a dumb pipe to alsa, as described here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php...b_pipe_to_ALSA
That should give the best of both worlds, with pa-reliant programs running fine, without disrupting sensitive software, like Jack.
 
Old 01-14-2016, 06:30 PM   #18
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,226

Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvester Ink View Post
How does it work out if you reconfigure pulseaudio as a dumb pipe to alsa, as described here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php...b_pipe_to_ALSA
That should give the best of both worlds, with pa-reliant programs running fine, without disrupting sensitive software, like Jack.
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...7/#post5477687
 
Old 01-14-2016, 06:41 PM   #19
Bertman123
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2010
Distribution: Slackware Current 64 bit KDE 5
Posts: 380

Rep: Reputation: 77
If it's one thing that I've learned over the years it's not what you do, but how you do it. I trust Pat and his team to do what is right for Slackware and personally I like pulseaudio.
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-14-2016, 09:19 PM   #20
mister_b
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2013
Location: US
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 28

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by astrogeek View Post
YIKES!!! I thought you wrote Hillary and was about to call l'hôpital psychiatrique!

But I agree, Hilary is much better listening, and looking!
On that note, one could certainly do worse than Yuja Wang to get one's Pulse going.
 
Old 01-15-2016, 12:45 AM   #21
a4z
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,727

Rep: Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post
I'll say this and then just step away...



How many of those posts were from Pat? Most of that rhetoric was thrown around by a few key individuals that are not involved in the Slackware development. Pat fixes problems... there was a problem with BlueZ 5, so he fixed it by adding pulseaudio. If he deems that there are insurmountable problems presented by not having PAM, then he is likely to do the same there.

I never saw Pat and team say they aren't adding pulseaudio/PAM/systemd/etc because it goes against the UNIX philosophy or that it doesn't follow the KISS principle.
hey, there is a problem with central authentication in Slackware, is simply does not work. Not fixed since years.
So no, it is not like that only technical reasons matter.
 
Old 01-15-2016, 12:56 AM   #22
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: McKinney, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 3,858

Rep: Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225
Quote:
Originally Posted by a4z View Post
hey, there is a problem with central authentication in Slackware, is simply does not work. Not fixed since years.
So no, it is not like that only technical reasons matter.
Did you mean there is a problem with central authentication that doesn't use NIS in Slackware?
 
Old 01-15-2016, 01:31 AM   #23
a4z
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,727

Rep: Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Cranium View Post
Did you mean there is a problem with central authentication that doesn't use NIS in Slackware?
NIS how could I forget about this?

possible because it was ok until lets say more than 1 decade ago and most environment have different requirements today?
 
Old 01-15-2016, 01:56 AM   #24
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,058

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by a4z View Post
hey, there is a problem with central authentication in Slackware, is simply does not work. Not fixed since years.
Not a bug, rather the lack of a feature. But Pat has clearly stated that this feature will not be provided in Slackware 14.2, so what's the point of asking again now?
 
Old 01-15-2016, 02:27 AM   #25
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: McKinney, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 3,858

Rep: Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225
Quote:
Originally Posted by a4z View Post
NIS how could I forget about this?

possible because it was ok until lets say more than 1 decade ago and most environment have different requirements today?
You should be more precise in your whining.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-15-2016, 04:11 AM   #26
a4z
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,727

Rep: Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Cranium View Post
You should be more precise in your whining.
, I am sorry to hear about your lack of fantasy and that you are not able to think about an environment with multibe apps and computers and users.
imagine for example something common:
Source control management, build servers, wiki, time tracking, the normal file sharing stuff and some other apps, all which need login and also being able to log in on many machines but not all, but one password. change on any system works instance for all apps and systems. an ddifferete OS. now you install a server in this environment so run say trac, you will set this up with NIS?
and than you join for a project in this environment and bring your notebook , what software do you need and do all processional useful distributions provide out of the box? you mean NIS? how many such environments have you build, or worked in with your Slackware workstation? Zero or Null?
 
Old 01-15-2016, 04:25 AM   #27
ReaperX7
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,558
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097
How many packages would need to be rebuilt to use Linux-PAM, if it ever got added, and how many packages would require rebuilds each time Linux-PAM was either patched or upgraded to avoid dependency issues?

Now who is going to maintain those packages?
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-15-2016, 05:27 AM   #28
Captain Pinkeye
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: The Czech Republic
Posts: 280

Rep: Reputation: 98
Thanks for the Pulseaudio. Seriously.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-15-2016, 07:52 AM   #29
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792

Rep: Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656
Quote:
Originally Posted by a4z View Post
hey, there is a problem with central authentication in Slackware, is simply does not work. Not fixed since years.
So no, it is not like that only technical reasons matter.
I think you missed the part where I said "If he deems that there are insurmountable problems presented by not having PAM, then he is likely to do the same there."

Plenty of people have "problems" by not having certain software shipped in Slackware. I have a "problem" using Slackware as my media center OS because it doesn't include kodi and its dependencies, but it isn't a "problem" in Pat's eyes, so there is no need for him to fix it (and I don't see the need to force my "problem" onto Pat). That means it's on me to get things running as I see fit (which is what Slackware is all about).

Obviously, Pat doesn't have a need to use central authentication, so it isn't a "problem" in his eyes that PAM is not included (which means there's no reason for him to fix it). That means it is left up to the user to tailor Slackware to their needs.

If Pat catered to everyone's "problems", Slackware would cease to be what it is and would probably end up on 20 DVDs and require 1TB of hard drive space to get a full install.

Last edited by bassmadrigal; 01-15-2016 at 12:38 PM. Reason: Oops... quoted the wrong post
 
4 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-15-2016, 08:12 AM   #30
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,058

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post
If Pat catered to everyone's "problems", Slackware would cease to be what it is and would probably end up on 20 DVDs and require 1TB of hard drive space to get a full install.
IOW Slackware would be Debian

PS Yes I know that a merge has been considered by Ian and Pat long ago. But I doubt that this will happen now.

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 01-15-2016 at 09:08 AM. Reason: PS added.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] What is wrong with using JDK in Slackware 14.1 jjthomas Slackware 5 02-23-2014 09:11 AM
[SOLVED] Have I been approaching Slackware wrong? fwuxi Slackware 34 09-26-2013 01:26 PM
What is wrong with Slackware these days? ProtoformX Slackware 42 03-14-2011 08:59 PM
Recompile goes wrong Slackware 13 sjampoo Slackware - Installation 1 04-20-2010 04:56 AM
What's wrong with Slackware Repository? brianL Zenwalk 10 05-05-2007 11:42 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration