SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It has been said in a few posts, but I also would like to see procps upgraded for procps-ng. Since procsp is packaged with psinfo and psmisc, it would be nice to see psinfo upgraded to psinfo-ng. I updated procps to procps-ng on my slackware64 machine because the newer sysctl uses /etc/sysctl.d directory in its path.
Some packages on SBo put files into /etc/sysctl.d and aren't activated unless they are put into the /etc/sysctl.conf file or manually added by setting something up in /etc/rc.d/rc.local (or update /etc/rc.d/rc.S). For example, libvirtd puts a sysctl file in /etc/sysctl.d/libvirtd.conf. Upgrading just saves me the time rather than remembering to run it manually. I also had to update /etc/rc.d/rc.S to account for this.
THIS is what I meant when I asked for an example of why we might *want* to replace procps - thanks!
If you've got local changes for this build already done, please send them along and save me some effort :-)
It contains a slightly edited SlackBuild file and a rollup patch for various defined fixes including a badly needed patch for partition detection methods.
This would effectively update Grub-2.00 to Grub-2.02~beta2.
Already built and tested and uploaded to my public repository I have available finally.
I haven't read every post so it may have already been said. But updating sip would be nice. I need an updated sip so that PyQt5 can be compiled. This in turn allows the newer 2.x version of calibre to compile as well.
sip would be a nice to have update but definitely not needed.
I have php 5.6 in my queue, together with mariadb 10.0. But there's some more important things that should be updated first before we start thinking of those two (icu4c, boost to name a few)
I did not have any luck (although I tested on a stable machine). Arch has moved it into the main repo but the patches looked the same ... perhaps they are not.
This would effectively update Grub-2.00 to Grub-2.02~beta2.
Do you know what the upstream release plan is for Grub-2.02? The only roadmap I can find is from 2013, my search ability is lacking. I wonder what the chances are of it making -current. TIA
I'm not sure. I followed the work on Grub up till about that time and then it just becomes patchworks, of which we have all of the current patches. The rest of the work looks to go towards add-ons like os-prober.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.