LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-16-2004, 05:16 PM   #16
DreameR-X
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 154

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30

So because I know for sure I'm using Slackware, I can save myself 31mb? Do I just use that 3.4mb tgz with the same instructions as if it were the 34mb one? Thanks for the help!
-Galen

EDIT: Whoa, so I just read that Slackpack install. It sounds like it doesn't need to install source? Do I miss out from not completely customizing my new kernel (like high ram support...I have 1024mb of ram). And I would do that after a fresh install...w/ 2.4.26. Sounds easy...am I wrong though?

Last edited by DreameR-X; 12-16-2004 at 05:21 PM.
 
Old 12-16-2004, 06:24 PM   #17
vaworx
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Honolulu/HI
Distribution: Slackware current, FreeBSD 4.10, 5.4, 6.2, Debian, RedHat, CentOS, Sun Cobalt OS
Posts: 66

Rep: Reputation: 15
High ram support is for systems with 2GB, 4GB and up so i suppose you don't need to compile that feature but another hint i would give you even though it might be too late already is that if you go by the book if you have 1GB and over of RAM it is strongly recommended that you use ECC registered memory.

Regards,
Vladimir Abadzhiev
 
Old 12-16-2004, 06:49 PM   #18
Namaseit
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 325

Rep: Reputation: 30
You would only need to recompile your kernel for high amounts of ram if you had say something above like 8 gigs.

You don't necessarily miss out on features by not compiling from source. You just miss out on the learning experience. As well I just prefer to compile my own kernel because then I choose everything that gets compiled as a module. I just like it more. Plus it's kinda nice.
 
Old 12-16-2004, 09:53 PM   #19
shilo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Stockton, CA
Distribution: Slackware 11 - kernel 2.6.19.1 - Dropline Gnome 2.16.2
Posts: 1,132

Rep: Reputation: 50
You should install the kernel source code. If you don't recompile for highmem support, only ~800 megs of memory are recognized. There is some debate as to what is the best method for dealing with 1G of ram. Some leave the highmem out, only recognizing ~800 megs. Others enable highmem, allowing full recognition of the 1G, but with possible extra overhead that may make the extra ram a moot point. The other solution is to apply the Con Kolivas patch, which moves the ram barrier up to allow 1G without adding highmem support.
 
Old 12-16-2004, 09:58 PM   #20
DreameR-X
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 154

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I thought compiling would be cool and a good experience...untill I realized it needs about 14hrs of your life or more. 4hrs to get set up...then 10 to fix everything you did wrong. I don't know...I did it once, so i had the learning experience of realizing: I'd much rather discover what stuff does as I use it...not try and guess what I MIGHT use and then forget I even have it and learn how to add it later anyway. But hey, that's me! So I'm reinstalling right now on the comp downstairs. I spent about 2.5hrs at the rec center and finished my readings...pretty cool stuff. His Kernel upgrade is just like SHILOs though, so I'm going to try that other one on the site Ninja Cow gave me (just upgrading generic,etc). Also, it seems like unless I'm using ext3 and SCSI or RAID, I really don't need initrd (I'm using ext2 since I have that nifty browser for Windows now and all my stuff is IDE). Thanks so much for all the help guys! 'till next time! (Feel free to IM me if you're bored: Number1Slackah on either Yahoo or AIM).
The Reborn Slackware'r,
-Galen

EDIT: Also, the insyte guy uses slackpkg w/o a problem. Anyone else use this as opposed to the super-duper swaret and slapt-get (sp?)
 
Old 12-16-2004, 10:01 PM   #21
DreameR-X
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 154

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Gracias Shilo, I'm googlin' that Con patch right now. Awesome site, but did you use Slackware 10 ISO? I didn't have the same luck you did, so I'm going insyte's way (which is basically your way + some new stuff).
-Galen
 
Old 12-16-2004, 10:30 PM   #22
Namaseit
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 325

Rep: Reputation: 30
Well I guess you know your into linux wayyyy too much when you can configure a kernel without even thinking about it!
Plus with my AMD 64 3200+ and 1gig of ram, it compiles in about 5 minutes. I was just configuring a kernel for my usb bootable distro I'm making and my friend couldn't believe I even knew what to check or how fast I was doing it. You really don't even notice after awhile because you've done thousands(or more) configurations and compiles.
 
Old 12-16-2004, 11:26 PM   #23
DreameR-X
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 154

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Yea the actual compiling is quick...I meant the configuring part.
-Galen
 
Old 12-16-2004, 11:47 PM   #24
Namaseit
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 325

Rep: Reputation: 30
Well, if you know your all of your system specs then it's fairly trivial. I built mine so I know every option needed. Not to mention I spent literally a month making sure that the motherboard I got was completely linux compatible. I sure wasn't going to spend $1500 on a new comp to find out usb, sound, or SATA doesn't work.
 
Old 12-16-2004, 11:57 PM   #25
DreameR-X
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 154

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Well I did build mine (more just assembled it though).

EDIT: Fixed LILO Prob (bitmap does sure look grainy though!)

-Galen

Last edited by DreameR-X; 12-17-2004 at 12:16 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
swaret - current -X- Slackware 0 06-11-2004 05:39 AM
upgrade to current without using swaret?!! oldi Slackware 3 05-03-2004 05:50 PM
swaret upgrade from 8.0 to current. carboncopy Slackware 14 04-05-2004 11:05 AM
swaret 9.1->current How long?? r_jensen11 Slackware 13 01-07-2004 02:59 AM
swaret.conf with current dfowensby Slackware 3 01-03-2004 12:43 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration