[SOLVED] So, there is PulseAudio... How about to begin investigating adding LinuxPAM to Slackware too?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Seems like some people here don't understand the concept of "regression" as it applies to software development.
Form a brief search, it appears that bluetooth support was added in Slackware 12.0 - i.e. 9 years ago. As such, bluetooth support is a de facto part of the Slackware specifications. If that support becomes broken, then software engineering principles would generally dictate that the developers identify and pursue a solution.
I have my own reasons for wanting PAM on my system, but to date I have not encountered any capability that one would deem part of the Slackware specification that is broken without it. If there has been anything, it's been fixed through some other means (i.e. the patches previously mentioned). If that changes, I imagine the dev team would add PAM to fix the regression.
There's no inconsistency here as far as I can tell.
Dave
How about the KDE's User Authorization going nuts since Ice Age, from the lack of PAM?
For example, try to Adjust Date and Time, even into latest slackware-current. What happen? Screenshot attached.
Sure, from a Hobby perspective, or someone who use his Linux to watch movies into family, I "troll" there again.
BUT, just imagine that you have on administration hundreds of computers, i.e. in a School, and their users starts in the same day to ask about that error, while you try to explain to Management, who usually think that "there is a problem, you'll have to fix it", that you can't fix it, because it come from the distribution Design.
In that day you will suddenly understand that "that error" sucks hundred times more than the lack of bluetooth...
PS. The screenshot was executed from root account, supposed to be Master of The System, all rights included.
Last edited by Darth Vader; 01-23-2016 at 11:16 AM.
How about the KDE's User Authorization going nuts since Ice Age, from the lack of PAM?
For example, try to Adjust Date and Time, even into latest slackware-current. What happen? Screenshot attached.
Sure, from a Hobby perspective, or someone who use his Linux to watch movies into family, I "troll" there again.
BUT, just imagine that you have on administration hundreds of computers, i.e. in a School, and their users starts in the same day to ask about that error, while you try to explain to Management, who usually think that "there is a problem, you'll have to fix it", that you can't fix it, because it come from the distribution Design.
In that day you will suddenly understand that "that error" sucks hundred times more than the lack of bluetooth...
PS. The screenshot was executed from root account, supposed to be Master of The System, all rights included.
Well, all I can say is I've never had any problems with KDE as a result of not having PAM. When I try to adjust the date/time from my non-privileged account, I get prompted for root's password. Expected behavior.
This is on -current. But I can't recall ever having had the problem you describe. What makes you sure it's because of no PAM?
Because I have the possibility to compare how work the (pure) Slackware with a very similar, but PAMified, Slackware build, who differ only as having everything built with the Magic Four Packages present. In the past, there was also difference of ARCH. Now they being similar too, as i586.
BTW, you tried to save the modifications?
To note that, in the last years, I tested and "that error" do not appear into OpenSUSE, Kubuntu, (pure) Ubuntu with KDE installed from repository, Pardus, Fedora, CentOS, RHEL, Gentoo and even in a PAMified Slackware. It is specific to (pure) Slackware.
Last edited by Darth Vader; 01-23-2016 at 12:08 PM.
Because I have the possibility to compare how work the (pure) Slackware with a very similar, but PAMified, Slackware build, who differ only as having everything built with the Magic Four Packages present. In the past, there was also difference of ARCH. Now they being similar too, as i586.
BTW, you tried to save the modifications?
To note that, in the last years, I tested and "that error" do not appear into OpenSUSE, Kubuntu, (pure) Ubuntu, Pardus, Fedora, CentOS, RHEL, Gentoo and even in a PAMified Slackware. It is specific to (pure) Slackware.
Yup, I saved the modifications. Both from non-root and root accounts. It all Just Works™. Anyway, I'm sorry your experience is not the same.
For example, try to Adjust Date and Time, even into latest slackware-current. What happen? Screenshot attached.
Just use NTP, either as a standalone client, or in a LAN, you can setup one of the servers to act as NTP client as well as server for the LAN. Frankly, this takes a couple minutes to setup. Here's some template files:
Just use NTP, either as a standalone client, or in a LAN, you can setup one of the servers to act as NTP client as well as server for the LAN. Frankly, this takes a couple minutes to setup. Here's some template files:
Do your users also define a custom IP address, hostname and CPU frequency?
haven't you given up KDE for MLED because it had to much configuration the user could/wants to change?
Interesting how you turn with the wind just to make some funny comments.
Do your users also define a custom IP address, hostname and CPU frequency?
Usually not, probably being afraid of consequences.
But, if you want to talk about only Administrator shall have the root access, I would like to say, probably nothing new for, that sine-die, for a User who have a physical access to computer, Slackware have no bigger protection, on escalating the access rights, than old-plain MS-DOS.
Just because the things are preserved into some precise /etc text files and no AD is available.
I do not know how is in France, but in Romania, Italy and Germany, if you give a Slackware computer to a 7 years old, he figure in max. one month how to gain the root access. My nephews are included in that category. One have 6, and now is interested to remote exploit the computer of his brother.
You known, the root account is for honest people, if you give them physically those computers.
BTW, some well known methods to gain the root access:
In Lilo prompt: Linux init /bin/sh
No Lilo prompt? Boot from a Live System, mount the root partition and replace the required files with some prepared ones.
Last edited by Darth Vader; 01-23-2016 at 02:45 PM.
Not directly. It is about a self-contained operating system, who defines its authentication into text files, which access rights can be bypassed easily.
Even with encrypted partitions, you have ability to unlock the root partition? The root access is guaranteed for you.
To understand that AD wasn't invented just for fun.
How about the KDE's User Authorization going nuts since Ice Age, from the lack of PAM?
For example, try to Adjust Date and Time, even into latest slackware-current. What happen? Screenshot attached.
Sure, from a Hobby perspective, or someone who use his Linux to watch movies into family, I "troll" there again.
BUT, just imagine that you have on administration hundreds of computers, i.e. in a School, and their users starts in the same day to ask about that error, while you try to explain to Management, who usually think that "there is a problem, you'll have to fix it", that you can't fix it, because it come from the distribution Design.
In that day you will suddenly understand that "that error" sucks hundred times more than the lack of bluetooth...
PS. The screenshot was executed from root account, supposed to be Master of The System, all rights included.
In Lilo prompt: Linux init /bin/sh
No Lilo prompt? Boot from a Live System, mount the root partition and replace the required files with some prepared ones.
Just password-protect your BIOS and your bootloader if your average user is an evil script kiddie.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.