SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
i have an really old computer, (spec: Pentium 133MHz, 16MB EDORAM, 1.2GB Hardisk, 16bit sound, 1MB PCI VGA, 8x CDrom) and recently found an old hardisk (10GB) which i planned to install slackware onto and put into my old computer.
However in the past i have used mulinux (2 floppy live distro) and X didn't start, it had error or something (which i can't recall now) but i was wondering would this spec be enough to get X running and allow me to run KDE or Gnome or at lease FVWM95?
I have another box that I was trying to put my HDD that contained Slackware in, it has a video card from ~96 (this was currently running win95 well). However, when I put Slackware in there it wouldn't even display the text you see when booting properly, much less any GUI stuff.
My first Slackware box had pretty much those specs, except I had 49MB RAM. In text mode, Slackware works fantastically, but in X it is, well, s l o w even with fluxbox. Forget about Gnome or KDE unless you have the patience of a saint.
I have a similar box, except that it has 128M ram and 10g hd. X works very nice with blackbox, icewm, windowmaker, xfce etc. Believe it's because of the ram. The video driver is just Vesa as far as i remember. It should work but maybe som extar ram will help you.
see the HOWTO: http://home.earthlink.net/~gnashley/...x_8.1howto.htm
16MB RAM is JUST enough to run X (you'll probably need at least 16-32MB swap also). The video RAM is a problem, you'll probably only get 800x600 resolution. Use vesa frame buffer and fluxbox or windowmaker.
If the vesa frame buffer won't work try xf86cfg -textmode and see if it has a driver for your card or install xfree86-xvfb and try that.
use opera browser and ROX-Filer