LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-28-2005, 06:06 AM   #1
redduck666
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 32

Rep: Reputation: 15
linux on low-end machine


i would like to put linux on s low-end machine. i would like it to do only few things:
- make it relativly simple to install it (i do realize that it will take a lot of work to put a 2k4-2k5 os on such an old machine)
- make it easy to connect to internet with dial-up (aka i would like that setting up a dial up connection is easy)
- be able to get open office

the specs of the computer are 266mhz cpu and 32mb ram.

any help appriciated
 
Old 03-28-2005, 06:16 AM   #2
Mega Man X
Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 63
Nah, it's not possible. Not to run Open Office anyway. If you are up to something more light as Abiword (word processor) or gnumeric (spreedsheet) then it could be possible. Open Office crawls in my 2.0 GHZ PIV with 512 RAM. The newer versions seems to start up a bit faster, but still...

Your processor is quite alright, problem is your ram memory. But if you are going to use Abiword and Gnumeric, then I would recommend you Slackare or Debian with a light weight Window Manager as IceWM, WMaker or Flux/Open/Blackbox.

Since you are low in RAM, you will need to use command line applications as often as you can, so no fancy gui's for you to configure your machine. To sum up, your options are:

1 - Use Win98 with MS Office in that machine. You'd get a great performance with usual MS-crashes

2 - Use something light weight and learn Linux for real instead counting with fancy gui's.

Side note: When you say dial up, I hope you have a real modem, not a win-modem
 
Old 03-28-2005, 06:29 AM   #3
uberNUT69
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Tasmania
Distribution: Xen Debian Lenny/Sid
Posts: 578

Rep: Reputation: 30
266 isnt that bad!
but 32MB is ...

the machine itself would be great as a firewall running ipcop (see ipcop.org) ... but an extra 16MB might help a bit.

getting openoffice to run on it might be pushing it a bit

try debian out ... you can make things pretty tight with debian..


to test it out, if you have a cdrom, you could try booting knoppix to see how it performs
 
Old 03-28-2005, 06:39 AM   #4
amosf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672

Rep: Reputation: 46
If you can find some more ram (and it's not too hard for old machines) and get it up to 64meg you can run a fairly useable system for net use, but OOo is going to be a problem... I haven't even tried to run it on the P166 I have here with 64meg, but I don't think it would run well...
 
Old 03-28-2005, 12:26 PM   #5
redduck666
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 32

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
when i said i want it to run openoffice i meant something that can open .doc files. according to thire site abiword can open .doc files, am i right?

knoppix won't run on that machine at least not with kde 3.x that afaik requires 512 ram. i do know that i'll have to run on that machine less intensive window manager.

according to quick google OOo is open office, right?

is there any particualr guide/howto/tutoial/wiki/whatever about putting linux on a machines like that or i just need to take care of software choices?


thanks for the replyes
 
Old 03-28-2005, 12:51 PM   #6
Mega Man X
Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 63
If that machine boots from the CD-Rom (and most likely, it does) so the process to install it is pretty much as any other distribution. Just make sure to get something light as Slackware or Debian. Their installers are command line based, but it's no rocket science, really. It's just not fancy
 
Old 03-28-2005, 01:05 PM   #7
kencaz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Distribution: Mandriva Slackware FreeBSD
Posts: 1,468

Rep: Reputation: 47
I have been running Slackware 8.1 on my Old Dell Latitude XPI for some time now. It's only a 166MMX 48meg ram 4gig HD.

It runs KDE 3.0 just fine, although not the fasted machine, it does everything I need it to do...

I even got it to run Knoppix 3.7 but very slow. not worth it. but the slackware HD install is perfect.

I would say make at least a 128meg swap part D/L Slackware 8.1 and try it.
http://www.linuxiso.org/distro.php?distro=17

Good Luck
KC
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best low end graphics card for linux? switch007 Linux - Hardware 18 02-19-2005 02:18 PM
A question on low end printer satimis Linux - Hardware 2 09-02-2004 07:09 AM
Installation on a low-end machine - kernal advice please? neocookie Linux - General 3 04-27-2004 03:26 PM
Linux and Apache on low end systems jpr9898 Linux - Newbie 12 03-02-2004 05:12 PM
How low-end can you go? KlaymenDK Linux - Hardware 10 11-01-2003 07:20 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration