SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I just saw this thread and thought, "what new logo?". Having just seen the new logo though, I don't like it either! I'm slightly annoyed that they have a better range of t-shirts (at the CafePress store) with the new logo than they do at the official store with the old logo .
It doesn't exactly stink, but it doesn't say "simplicity" to me the way the old logo did. Meh, just like any Slacker, I'll use the logo that looks best!
I don't like the new logo at all. The problem with this kind of graphic design is that the people creating stuff like this don't seem to take into account how it will effect the seeing impaired. The old logo was elegant, simple, and easy to read. The new logo is virtually impossible to read. I seriously hope that this doesn't become the default for the next Slackware version.
It's there and it stays there - why do you all think it will suddenly go away if you complain loud enough?
Remember, it is a logo - it does have the letters 'Slackware' but since it is a logo, you're not required to read it - you're supposed to recognize it as being about Slackware. And the new logo definitely succeeds there.
Not being judgmental about this, before anyone gets upset. But you're going to get a lot of complaints about this -just because it is different-, people just don't like change much at all. That said, I think it's pretty nifty
It's there and it stays there - why do you all think it will suddenly go away if you complain loud enough?
Eric
Well, it certainly won't go away if we say nothing!
Why do you think people shouldn't be allowed to express their opinion? If Pat chooses not to act on that feedback then that is his prerogative as with all things Slackware.
If I was Pat, I'd be happy that people care enough to tell me they hate it before I went and got a whole heap of T-Shirts made that no one will buy. A little bit of negative feedback should always be preferred to a whole lot of apathy.
What you've basically said above is "STFU NOOBS! We don't care if you ALL hate it and we're not changing it back no matter what!". That just smacks of arrogance. (What would have happened to Coca Cola if they'd taken the same attitude to the outcry about 'New Coke'?)
At the end of the day its just a logo and its not worth starting a holy war about it. I don't like it, but I accept that others might. I'm more concerned that you, as one of the 'recognised voices of the Slackware team' on this forum, would respond to the people who have cared enough to express their opinions with such a degree of open contempt. A "Thankyou for the feedback. We appreciate people have different tastes, but we like the new logo and don't intend to change it back" would have been a thousand times better way of responding to this. It really costs nothing to be polite and respectful.
Remember, it is a logo - it does have the letters 'Slackware' but since it is a logo, you're not required to read it
I usually agree with you Eric, but not this time. If there are more than a few letters in a logo, it is obvious that the creator of that logo meant for people to read it (I thought Pat even talked about reading it differently, guess I must of had trouble with that too). Anyways, I find this logo very poorly done and voiced my opinion. My perception of this logo since your comments (it's there and it stays there, *basically deal with it*) tells me that Slackware has absolutely no interest anymore in catering to the seeing impaired and that is unfortunate.
By the way, since when did constructive criticism automatically get dismissed as complaining?
Frank
Last edited by fcaraballo; 08-16-2008 at 02:40 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.