SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've been using Slackware for several years, but haven't really encountered (or put much thought into) a definite answer on Slackware's amount of "freedom" as defined by the FSF and the Stallmanites. Does Slackware knowingly include much non-free software, or is it mostly all in the kernels that ship with it by default?
There is a small amount of software that would be considered "non-free" by the Free Software Foundation. An example is ksh93, i.e., the latest version of AT&T's Korn shell.
As far as I am aware, Slackware has no official stance on this subject. Slackware basically just goes with whatever works, and doesn't get too tangled up in the philosophical ideals that some other distributions wrestle with.
That said, Slack also has an extremely small set of packages when compared to most mainstream distributions, so by just the law of averages it is less like for Slack to wind up in those sorts of situations.
Well, it's certainly not officially certified by the FSF as being as pure as RMS decrees, but then very very very few distros are, ones you've probably never heard of.
Well, it's certainly not officially certified by the FSF as being as pure as RMS decrees, but then very very very few distros are, ones you've probably never heard of.
Debian is definitely the closest of the major distributions to being included on the list, but from what I've read the GNU project's main gripe with it is that its guidelines are too vague (I find them pretty succinct) and its extremely minimal inclusion of proprietary code. That being said, I think Slackware would be easier to make a free spin-off of than most other distributions. The kernel source is its main problem but, using the libre kernel, and with a handpicked set of packages, there wouldn't be much standing in its way. But the effort.. :P
There is - or was - a free/libre Slackware spinoff. That would be Kongoni Linux (http://kongoni.co.za/).
However, last week the sole developer announced that he pulls the plug - according to his story, there has been no input from other people apart from himself in the year that the distro existed.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.