Shouldn't Slack skip the "Unlucky 13" and go directly to 14 ?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I haven't checked the slackware website, but does it actually say anywhere that it's going to be 13.0? You remember the lengthy thread about the need for slackware 64. None of the slackware guys spilled the beans
If by any chance this coming version does happen to come out on April 13, then I think that on the front of the disc, there should be a Bob Dobbs design, and the disc should be a DVD9 dual layer disc. Layer1, Slackware Linux, and layer2, the Subgenius movie Arise! (A DVD-Video/DVD-ROM) It would be a Slackware/Church of the Subgenius Special edition version of Slackware. That would be really cool!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.