Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
09-22-2004, 03:44 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Distribution: Fedora 4 - Slackware 10 - PHLAK
Posts: 92
Rep:
|
seperate /boot partition
Is there, or what is the benefit to having /boot on a seperate partition?
if so, what size should it be?
|
|
|
|
09-22-2004, 04:01 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: california
Distribution: mdklinux8.1
Posts: 1,209
Rep:
|
jturnbul; ? not clear,what specifically intent on doing? beside booting what size hdd & os,s intalling? each os requires certain amount of space to operate on including swapspace.
a simple answer yes, would accomodate
dual booting without interfering each other. suggestion: please next time add bit more info pertinent to ?.
|
|
|
|
09-22-2004, 04:16 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Distribution: Fedora 4 - Slackware 10 - PHLAK
Posts: 92
Original Poster
Rep:
|
well I had fedora core 2 on my laptop, dual booting with XP. I have been triple booting Win2K, fedora, and Slack on my desktop. I have decided I enjoy Slack the most, and going to go with Slack only.
I'm going to install slack on my laptop, and wondering if I should use the existing fedora partitions, as fedora by default breaks your partition into a swap, / , and /boot. I notice with Slack it will just use a / , and swap partition. just curious what is the better route to go and any benefit one way or the other.
btw my HD is 80 gigs with 60 going to XP, and the other 20 to Linux
sorry if I was vague, assumed peeps would know what i was talking about.
|
|
|
|
09-22-2004, 05:26 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 93
Rep:
|
Really the only benefit to having /boot on its own partition is one of safety. You can set up your FSTAB to make /boot read only, so you're assured nothing is going to ever change in there unless you go through the steps to do it yourself. Otherwise, Slackware runs just fine with only a / and /swap partition.
You can have anything on different partitions. Some people make them for /var, /tmp, /home, etc, all for different reasons. It all comes down to personal preference and need.
|
|
|
|
09-22-2004, 06:45 PM
|
#5
|
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Makaelin
Really the only benefit to having /boot on its own partition is one of safety.
|
But this is a huge benefit, and if you are concerned about security (which you should be) then the /boot partition should be mounted as read-only in fstab, just as Makaelin suggested.
You are correct that /boot does not have to be explicitly defined and given its own partition, however, it would be good practice to do so IMO. In terms of size, a 32Mg /boot partition should be plenty. You can go bigger, but more than 128Mg is probably just a waste of disk space, considering that the typical kernel is usually only a little more than 1Mg.
Not to go overboard with partitioning, but if you have 20G to give to Linux (you might want to consider reversing the amounts you are giving to each OS  ) then I would suggest a 32Mg /boot, a 256Mg swap, a 6G / and the rest to /home. (Putting /home on its own partition is also a good idea, as it separates your personal data from all system data. This allows you to upgrade to a newer release of Slack, or to switch to an entirely different distro, without having to take any special steps other than to *not* format your /home partition when you are doing the fresh installation.)
Note that partitioning is totally subjective, and everybody has their own ideas as to what is "best" - there is no real right or wrong way to do it. Good luck with it either way. You are making a good choice by going with Slack -- J.W.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|