LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-30-2014, 03:37 PM   #1
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Possibile regresion on mozilla-firefox-32.0.3, for current (slow and processor hog, on heavy load)


For some mysterious reason, the latest 32.0.3 for current behave like a slowwwww processor hog, eating a core solo, then I need to reverse quickly & temporary to previous version, mozilla-firefox-32.0-i486-1.txz.

Still, I do not find any un-synchronized mirror to get it. Any of you still have this package?

LATER:

So, finally, I can confirm that in my particular hardware (Phenom x4 9950, 8G DDR2 RAM), software (Slackware 32bit current) and habits (around 10 Firefox windows, every one with around 20 tabs open), Firefox 32.0.3 behave like a snail and eat an entire core processing power, while the previous version, 32.0, behave normal.

Last edited by Darth Vader; 10-01-2014 at 02:17 AM.
 
Old 09-30-2014, 03:44 PM   #2
teckk
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 5,146
Blog Entries: 6

Rep: Reputation: 1833Reputation: 1833Reputation: 1833Reputation: 1833Reputation: 1833Reputation: 1833Reputation: 1833Reputation: 1833Reputation: 1833Reputation: 1833Reputation: 1833
ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackwar...0-x86_64-1.txz
ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackwar...2.0-i486-1.txz
 
Old 09-30-2014, 03:47 PM   #3
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Well, there, in ftp://ftp.slackware.com, is available, of course, the latest version, 32.0.3, BUT I need the previous build on current, 32.0. That from Thu Sep 4 19:43:25 UTC 2014

Last edited by Darth Vader; 09-30-2014 at 04:19 PM.
 
Old 09-30-2014, 04:35 PM   #4
moisespedro
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2013
Location: Brazil
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,223

Rep: Reputation: 195Reputation: 195
Can't you build it yourself?
 
Old 09-30-2014, 05:56 PM   #5
rkelsen
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,463
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561
Did you submit a bug report to PV with your findings? If not, why not?
 
Old 09-30-2014, 06:20 PM   #6
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,242

Rep: Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322
I agree with rkelsen. You've tested the package (thank you) and your test has found a show-stopping regression (big thank-you). Please report your findings to Pat, so that he can fix the problem (possibly by reverting the slackware-current Firefox package to 32.0).

Last edited by dugan; 09-30-2014 at 09:32 PM.
 
Old 09-30-2014, 07:29 PM   #7
chrisretusn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 2,978

Rep: Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556
Firefox 32.0.3 is working just fine for me on Slackware64-current. Perhaps it's a 32-bit issue.

Why not download the Firefox source tarball from ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/ and compile it using the SlackBuild from the Slackware source. You will of course need the entire contents of slackware-current/source/xap/mozilla-firefox/ minus the 32.0.3 tarball and signature file.
Code:
firefox-32.0.3.source.tar.bz2
firefox-32.0.3.source.tar.bz2.asc
firefox.moz_plugin_path.diff.gz
gold/
mimeTypes.rdf.gz
mozilla-firefox-mimeTypes-fix.diff.gz
mozilla-firefox.SlackBuild*
mozilla-firefox.desktop
slack-desc
 
Old 09-30-2014, 10:23 PM   #8
MadMaverick9
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2010
Posts: 353
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
http://www.mmnt.net/db/0/11/ftp.pies...slackware/xap/
http://www.mmnt.net/db/0/12/ftp.pies...slackware/xap/

And you can and should verify that this is an original build, by doing a "gpg --verify mozilla-firefox-32.0-i486-1.txz.asc".

Code:
bash $ gpg --verify mozilla-firefox-32.0-i486-1.txz.asc 
gpg: Signature made 2014-09-05T02:51:00 ICT using DSA key ID 40102233
gpg: Good signature from "Slackware Linux Project <security@slackware.com>"
Since this is not an official mirror as far as I can tell, I would advise not to skip the verification.

ftp://ftp.pieskovisko.sk/pub/slackwa...slackware/xap/

Last edited by MadMaverick9; 09-30-2014 at 10:31 PM. Reason: Add ftp url.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-01-2014, 02:13 AM   #9
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMaverick9 View Post
http://www.mmnt.net/db/0/11/ftp.pies...slackware/xap/
http://www.mmnt.net/db/0/12/ftp.pies...slackware/xap/

And you can and should verify that this is an original build, by doing a "gpg --verify mozilla-firefox-32.0-i486-1.txz.asc".

Code:
bash $ gpg --verify mozilla-firefox-32.0-i486-1.txz.asc 
gpg: Signature made 2014-09-05T02:51:00 ICT using DSA key ID 40102233
gpg: Good signature from "Slackware Linux Project <security@slackware.com>"
Since this is not an official mirror as far as I can tell, I would advise not to skip the verification.

ftp://ftp.pieskovisko.sk/pub/slackwa...slackware/xap/
Big Thanks!

Then reverted the Firefox, and everything is OK.

So, finally, I can confirm that in my particular hardware (Phenom x4 9950, 8G DDR2 RAM), software (Slackware 32bit current) and habits (around 10 Firefox windows, every one with around 20 tabs open), Firefox 32.0.3 behave like a snail and eat an entire core processing power, while the previous version, 32.0, behave normal.

Last edited by Darth Vader; 10-01-2014 at 02:23 AM.
 
Old 10-01-2014, 02:19 AM   #10
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
I agree with rkelsen. You've tested the package (thank you) and your test has found a show-stopping regression (big thank-you). Please report your findings to Pat, so that he can fix the problem (possibly by reverting the slackware-current Firefox package to 32.0).
I can consider this thread as a bug report, knowing that P.V. and his merry guys lurks there...
 
Old 10-01-2014, 05:06 AM   #11
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557

Rep: Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762
You really should not downgrade and I think it highly unlikely that Pat will downgrade the official package. Firefox 32.0.3 was released specifically to fix the BERserk SSL Flaw (CVE-2014-1568, a vulnerability that could enable a digital signature forgery attack).

Intel Security General Manager Mike Fey has commented

Quote:
Given that certificates can be forged for any domain, this issue raises serious concerns around integrity and confidentiality as we traverse what we perceive to be secure websites
As you can see this is a really nasty issue and if it wasn't for Shellshock I suspect we would have had a lot more discussion about this here.

P.S. I should add that almost every release of all major browsers includes one or more security updates. It is therefore not recommended that you run older browsers

Last edited by ruario; 10-01-2014 at 05:09 AM. Reason: moved all of the quote into the quote section
 
Old 10-01-2014, 09:01 AM   #12
1337_powerslacker
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Kansas, USA
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 862
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592
Here's another idea about regressing to 32.0: There's a way to repackage the binary tarball provided by Mozilla, and I have been using it for months now with great success.

Note: Make a mozilla-firefox/ sub-directory and make sure you specify it when downloading before following these steps.

First, download the 32.0 tarball: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.o...releases/32.0/

Then, go download the SlackBuild for Firefox from here: http://slackware.osuosl.org/slackwar...zilla-firefox/

Select 'Save File As' or 'Save link as' when right-clicking each file. Save in the directory you created.

Modify the version number in the SlackBuild, and make it executable, like so:

Code:
chmod +x mozilla-firefox.SlackBuild
You may want to change the makepkg line in the SlackBuild from '.tgz' to '.txz', but that's just my personal preference.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Matt
 
Old 10-01-2014, 11:14 AM   #13
gus3
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2014
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 490

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
So it comes down to security vs. usability? Having worked in an InfoSec shop, I know the two are not mutually incompatible.

Here's the spec on my netbook:

ASUS EeePC 900
512M RAM
900MHz Celeron
External USB drive as boot

Launching Firefox with just one tab (email login) takes well over a minute, with CPU pegged at 100%, *even after the page is finished loading.* Keyboard input gets buffered by X, so I can have my entire username and passsword typed before any of the input shows up on-screen. And then it takes almost 3 minutes between hitting Enter and having my Inbox show on-screen.

During this slow-down, there is little to no paging I/O. The system isn't thrashing (1G swap, 995M free as I type this). It's just running the CPU entirely too much.

Something has gone seriously wrong. The previous version didn't behave at all like this.
 
Old 10-01-2014, 01:08 PM   #14
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792

Rep: Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656
Have the people who have been noticing the bug tried building it directly from Mozilla's tarball? It could help determine if it is just an issue with the slack pacakge, or something with Mozilla itself. That would dictate who needs to work on getting it resolved. If it's Mozilla, they would have to release an update before anything can be fixed, if it's Pat, he would just need to repackage it and then provide the new package.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-01-2014, 03:48 PM   #15
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post
Have the people who have been noticing the bug tried building it directly from Mozilla's tarball? It could help determine if it is just an issue with the slack pacakge, or something with Mozilla itself. That would dictate who needs to work on getting it resolved. If it's Mozilla, they would have to release an update before anything can be fixed, if it's Pat, he would just need to repackage it and then provide the new package.
OK, I tested the binary shipped by Mozilla, and surprise! That build works OK, maybe slightly slower, but barely noticeable. Then, looks that is something wrong in the Slackware build...

I have no time to try a local build, but maybe is something wrong with the default toolkit, or maybe even Firefox do not like the default optimizations of our GCC? I noticed also, maybe after so long time, that the Mozilla build is i686, not i586... Maybe Firefox want a i686 build?

Last edited by Darth Vader; 10-01-2014 at 03:54 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fontconfig-2.10.2-i486-1.txz and firefox/thunderbird burdi01 Slackware 34 03-02-2013 11:59 AM
Uneeded "/usr/lib64//firefox-3.6.10" directory in mozilla-firefox-4.0b6-x86_64-1.txz michelino Slackware 0 09-21-2010 05:20 AM
No qt-doc after installation of qt-r1008952-i486-1.txz from dvd Squall90 Slackware 3 07-13-2010 10:52 PM
kdebase-workspace-4.3.4-i486-1.txz anyone? antitu Slackware 2 06-09-2010 02:21 PM
[-CURRENT] QScintilla-2.4-i486-1.txz corrupted? raffaele181188 Slackware 3 10-29-2009 02:49 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration