Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
09-30-2014, 03:37 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727
|
Possibile regresion on mozilla-firefox-32.0.3, for current (slow and processor hog, on heavy load)
For some mysterious reason, the latest 32.0.3 for current behave like a slowwwww processor hog, eating a core solo, then I need to reverse quickly & temporary to previous version, mozilla-firefox-32.0-i486-1.txz.
Still, I do not find any un-synchronized mirror to get it. Any of you still have this package?
LATER:
So, finally, I can confirm that in my particular hardware (Phenom x4 9950, 8G DDR2 RAM), software (Slackware 32bit current) and habits (around 10 Firefox windows, every one with around 20 tabs open), Firefox 32.0.3 behave like a snail and eat an entire core processing power, while the previous version, 32.0, behave normal.
Last edited by Darth Vader; 10-01-2014 at 02:17 AM.
|
|
|
09-30-2014, 03:44 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 5,476
|
|
|
|
09-30-2014, 03:47 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by teckk
|
Well, there, in ftp://ftp.slackware.com, is available, of course, the latest version, 32.0.3, BUT I need the previous build on current, 32.0. That from Thu Sep 4 19:43:25 UTC 2014 
Last edited by Darth Vader; 09-30-2014 at 04:19 PM.
|
|
|
09-30-2014, 04:35 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2013
Location: Brazil
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,223
Rep: 
|
Can't you build it yourself?
|
|
|
09-30-2014, 05:56 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,920
|
Did you submit a bug report to PV with your findings? If not, why not?
|
|
|
09-30-2014, 06:20 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,375
|
I agree with rkelsen. You've tested the package (thank you) and your test has found a show-stopping regression (big thank-you). Please report your findings to Pat, so that he can fix the problem (possibly by reverting the slackware-current Firefox package to 32.0).
Last edited by dugan; 09-30-2014 at 09:32 PM.
|
|
|
09-30-2014, 07:29 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 3,470
|
Firefox 32.0.3 is working just fine for me on Slackware64-current. Perhaps it's a 32-bit issue.
Why not download the Firefox source tarball from ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/ and compile it using the SlackBuild from the Slackware source. You will of course need the entire contents of slackware-current/source/xap/mozilla-firefox/ minus the 32.0.3 tarball and signature file.
Code:
firefox-32.0.3.source.tar.bz2
firefox-32.0.3.source.tar.bz2.asc
firefox.moz_plugin_path.diff.gz
gold/
mimeTypes.rdf.gz
mozilla-firefox-mimeTypes-fix.diff.gz
mozilla-firefox.SlackBuild*
mozilla-firefox.desktop
slack-desc
|
|
|
10-01-2014, 02:13 AM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMaverick9
|
Big Thanks!
Then reverted the Firefox, and everything is OK.
So, finally, I can confirm that in my particular hardware (Phenom x4 9950, 8G DDR2 RAM), software (Slackware 32bit current) and habits (around 10 Firefox windows, every one with around 20 tabs open), Firefox 32.0.3 behave like a snail and eat an entire core processing power, while the previous version, 32.0, behave normal.
Last edited by Darth Vader; 10-01-2014 at 02:23 AM.
|
|
|
10-01-2014, 02:19 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan
I agree with rkelsen. You've tested the package (thank you) and your test has found a show-stopping regression (big thank-you). Please report your findings to Pat, so that he can fix the problem (possibly by reverting the slackware-current Firefox package to 32.0).
|
I can consider this thread as a bug report, knowing that P.V. and his merry guys lurks there... 
|
|
|
10-01-2014, 05:06 AM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,559
|
You really should not downgrade and I think it highly unlikely that Pat will downgrade the official package. Firefox 32.0.3 was released specifically to fix the BERserk SSL Flaw (CVE-2014-1568, a vulnerability that could enable a digital signature forgery attack).
Intel Security General Manager Mike Fey has commented
Quote:
Given that certificates can be forged for any domain, this issue raises serious concerns around integrity and confidentiality as we traverse what we perceive to be secure websites
|
As you can see this is a really nasty issue and if it wasn't for Shellshock I suspect we would have had a lot more discussion about this here.
P.S. I should add that almost every release of all major browsers includes one or more security updates. It is therefore not recommended that you run older browsers
Last edited by ruario; 10-01-2014 at 05:09 AM.
Reason: moved all of the quote into the quote section
|
|
|
10-01-2014, 09:01 AM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Kansas, USA
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 865
|
Here's another idea about regressing to 32.0: There's a way to repackage the binary tarball provided by Mozilla, and I have been using it for months now with great success.
Note: Make a mozilla-firefox/ sub-directory and make sure you specify it when downloading before following these steps.
First, download the 32.0 tarball: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.o...releases/32.0/
Then, go download the SlackBuild for Firefox from here: http://slackware.osuosl.org/slackwar...zilla-firefox/
Select 'Save File As' or 'Save link as' when right-clicking each file. Save in the directory you created.
Modify the version number in the SlackBuild, and make it executable, like so:
Code:
chmod +x mozilla-firefox.SlackBuild
You may want to change the makepkg line in the SlackBuild from '.tgz' to '.txz', but that's just my personal preference.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Matt
|
|
|
10-01-2014, 11:14 AM
|
#13
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2014
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 514
Rep: 
|
So it comes down to security vs. usability? Having worked in an InfoSec shop, I know the two are not mutually incompatible.
Here's the spec on my netbook:
ASUS EeePC 900
512M RAM
900MHz Celeron
External USB drive as boot
Launching Firefox with just one tab (email login) takes well over a minute, with CPU pegged at 100%, *even after the page is finished loading.* Keyboard input gets buffered by X, so I can have my entire username and passsword typed before any of the input shows up on-screen. And then it takes almost 3 minutes between hitting Enter and having my Inbox show on-screen.
During this slow-down, there is little to no paging I/O. The system isn't thrashing (1G swap, 995M free as I type this). It's just running the CPU entirely too much.
Something has gone seriously wrong. The previous version didn't behave at all like this.
|
|
|
10-01-2014, 01:08 PM
|
#14
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792
|
Have the people who have been noticing the bug tried building it directly from Mozilla's tarball? It could help determine if it is just an issue with the slack pacakge, or something with Mozilla itself. That would dictate who needs to work on getting it resolved. If it's Mozilla, they would have to release an update before anything can be fixed, if it's Pat, he would just need to repackage it and then provide the new package.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
10-01-2014, 03:48 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal
Have the people who have been noticing the bug tried building it directly from Mozilla's tarball? It could help determine if it is just an issue with the slack pacakge, or something with Mozilla itself. That would dictate who needs to work on getting it resolved. If it's Mozilla, they would have to release an update before anything can be fixed, if it's Pat, he would just need to repackage it and then provide the new package.
|
OK, I tested the binary shipped by Mozilla, and surprise! That build works OK, maybe slightly slower, but barely noticeable. Then, looks that is something wrong in the Slackware build...
I have no time to try a local build, but maybe is something wrong with the default toolkit, or maybe even Firefox do not like the default optimizations of our GCC? I noticed also, maybe after so long time, that the Mozilla build is i686, not i586... Maybe Firefox want a i686 build?
Last edited by Darth Vader; 10-01-2014 at 03:54 PM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|