SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The PUEL version of VirtualBox works perfectly on Slackware64. Just grab the static binary, set up the appropriate user accounts and away you go. I know it isn't open source, but so aren't most of the other packages you mentioned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brooko
supported flash (64-bit no longer supported i think?)
Adobe released Flash Player Square last week, which includes amongst other things support for 64bit linux. See this thread for details:
The biggest hurdle for me would be wine, I like to play some win games such as SCII and nwn2. If I could know that I could get those running under 64bit I would definately switch.
When is 64-bit faster??? I've noticed no improvements, is video encoding any quicker? The main job of my desktop is to turn mpeg2 recordings in to mpg4/divx's.
Video encoding would benefit by using a 64-bit OS. Other applications are less proven, but if you will mainly be encoding video, 64-bit is a wise choice.
Is this your experience? If so, this is definitely interesting!
See here (Windows DivX) and here (Ubuntu XVid and other random operations). I haven't timed 32-bit vs 64-bit encoding myself, and it's been a while now since I've encoded on a 32-bit system (all my systems are now 64-bit) so I can't even provide anecdotal evidence myself...but CPU-intensive operations like video encoding are definitely, at least theoretically and apparently in practice according to the above links, superior in 64-bit systems compared to 32-bit ones.
The biggest hurdle for me would be wine, I like to play some win games such as SCII and nwn2. If I could know that I could get those running under 64bit I would definately switch.
You could go multilib route and install Eric's compat32 packages, wine will build just fine after that. I play Warcraft III on my Slackware64-multilib with wine.
I will close this thread as my questions got answered. I tried Slack64 on my new htpc and so far so good. I did not notice a big benefit and probably more complications than required due to compatibility issues or limitations so I think I will stick to 32bit releases until they force me out!!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.