LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2008, 08:27 AM   #1
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Rep: Reputation: 52
Love the new look on Slackware FTP (firefox-3.0 issue)


No more mosiac !!!!

Sorry. Pretty irrelevant post but it's about time, because as we all know, it's the aesthetics that matters. The name column is roomy as well.

Now all it needs is a bandwidth upgrade...

Last edited by jong357; 06-28-2008 at 09:30 AM. Reason: Edited subject title
 
Old 06-27-2008, 08:57 AM   #2
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Hey... I have a feeling firefox 3 is somehow doing this to me.. Anyone care to confirm? In the middle of trying to build epiphany svn/webkit/gperf to try another browser...
 
Old 06-27-2008, 09:17 AM   #3
digger95
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Indiana, PA
Distribution: Slackware 14
Posts: 330

Rep: Reputation: 46
I usually try to wait at least until noon to start drinking.
 
Old 06-27-2008, 09:44 AM   #4
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
I can dink whn evr I god dan want to.. hick...

Seriously. Check it out.

Slackware FTP under a source built Firefox 3.0:
http://jaguarlinux.com/pub/sandbox/slackware-ftp.png

GNU ftp mirror (gperf directory):
http://jaguarlinux.com/pub/sandbox/gperf-ftp.png

It's even using my current Gnome Mist icons for the theme...

Anyone running a prebuilt mozilla binary of 3.0 wish to confirm?

Last edited by jong357; 06-27-2008 at 09:49 AM.
 
Old 06-27-2008, 09:47 AM   #5
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
That's freakin sweet.

However, the n/ directory is unpopulated and a couple directories here and there don't have icons. Can anyone else confirm on that? Is the unpopulated n/ directory actually a Slackware FTP issue or is it just me?
 
Old 06-27-2008, 10:11 AM   #6
Toods
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 249

Rep: Reputation: 32
Hi,

I too have seen similar visual effects with my Firefox 3 self-built package. It is definitely to do with Firefox 3 because if I go back to my old Firefox 2 installation it is as previous. The file icons all display a kind of yellow colour and in the Slackware packages directories the icons do not show at all - just the file names. Very strange. We need to know how Firefox 3 is doing this so that we can have control over the configuration.

Bill.
 
Old 06-27-2008, 10:20 AM   #7
allend
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 6,375

Rep: Reputation: 2754Reputation: 2754Reputation: 2754Reputation: 2754Reputation: 2754Reputation: 2754Reputation: 2754Reputation: 2754Reputation: 2754Reputation: 2754Reputation: 2754
n/ directory contains all the usual suspects for me, but it is way past noon here, so bottoms up!
 
Old 06-27-2008, 10:25 AM   #8
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Thanks for the reply Bill. Saw your thread at mozilla. Don't think you'll get a reply, tho you never know. But to answer your question, yes, it looks as if Firefox is going Gnome.... Unless it displays this type of behavior with KDE themes as well....

I don't know about any Gnome bits being required at build time, but it looks as if it's going Gnome Centric anyway.... That's just fine with me. Gnome is my favorite DE...

Not too happy about the missing icons but I'll see what I can't dig up concerning that.

Can someone visit the n/ directory on Slackware-current and tell me if it is empty for them please? Someone running Opera or firefox-2.x... Still building webkit for epiphany but that'll complete sometime and I'll find out then I guess.

edit - oh. Thanks for the n/ report. Still empty here under FF-3.0. Wow, Just made a huge sigh.... I don't know what to make of FF-3.0 yet... I like it alot but the damn thing is displaying some quirks. Empty directories is a show stopper IMO, unlike an unpopulated applications--> preferences menu...

Last edited by jong357; 06-27-2008 at 10:30 AM.
 
Old 06-27-2008, 10:48 AM   #9
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Just did a refresh on the n/ directory and everything is there now. Dunno. Go back and it's empty again. Have to keep hitting the refresh button.

The icons do change with your theme. Just changed to Darklooks and restarted firefox and now the ftp icons are different.

Bill, I'll poke around over the next few days and report back if I find out anything with this theme behavior.

Last edited by jong357; 06-27-2008 at 10:54 AM.
 
Old 06-27-2008, 11:03 AM   #10
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toods View Post
The file icons all display a kind of yellow colour and in the Slackware packages directories the icons do not show at all - just the file names.
I'll assume your running KDE? Kinda what I gathered from your post at mozilla. That is probably because you didn't build it against Gnome. Guessing anyways...

For everyone getting upset at firefox for these issues, I suppose there is every right to, but you need to remember that your running one of the only Linux distro's that doesn't ship Gnome (or build firefox for that matter).... Who's fault is it really? Ultimately I suppose it's firefox but one could argue the other way around as well.

Historically, Gnome and KDE have conflicted with Desktop Specification usage. Also, if I remember correctly, Slackware doesn't populate KDE icon directories with gtk-update-icon-cache..... That might be a logical place to start but I don't know how firefox is handling this new behavior...

Let's try to remember here that Firefox is a GTK2 based web browser, not QT... This is progress folks, like it or not. You can't be biased towards one toolkit in Linux when there are others actively used. I'm quite the hipocrate for saying that because I run a QT/KDE-less system...

Last edited by jong357; 06-27-2008 at 11:19 AM.
 
Old 06-27-2008, 02:14 PM   #11
the3dfxdude
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 735

Rep: Reputation: 360Reputation: 360Reputation: 360Reputation: 360
Quote:
Originally Posted by jong357 View Post
Let's try to remember here that Firefox is a GTK2 based web browser, not QT... This is progress folks, like it or not. You can't be biased towards one toolkit in Linux when there are others actively used. I'm quite the hipocrate for saying that because I run a QT/KDE-less system...
But Firefox 3 isn't strictly GTK2. It would be nice if it was. I have no problem with running strictly GTK2 or QT apps.

On the other hand, the trend seems to be for newer GTK2 apps to start pulling in other parts of Gnome or think because it is GTK2, you have to run gnome. I can tell as I usually get a .gnome populated some way or another these days. Constrast this with QT apps that don't require KDE. I don't get a .kde every time I run them. QT and KDE are fully separated in a sense. Whereas GTK2 is getting muddied with Gnome more and more.

BTW, I only use TWM, so I can tell which apps behave nicely without full DE's. QT ones work far better than the Gnomish ones.
 
Old 06-28-2008, 09:31 AM   #12
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402742

But that was supposed to have been resolved.... I tried to sit down and scroll thru about:config but didn't have the patience for it. Maybe there is a listing that will disable the new ftp look.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
About Slackware 9.1 boot disk?? ftp://ftp.kpn.be/pub/linux/slackware/slackware-9.1-is AL3OMDAH Slackware 4 04-18-2007 09:54 AM
I Love Slackware! leemoreau Slackware 5 02-11-2004 12:08 PM
I love Slackware :) satanic_linux Slackware 8 02-03-2004 09:24 AM
If you love Slackware... hecresper LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories 8 08-31-2003 10:17 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration