LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-10-2016, 11:37 AM   #46
hitest
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Void, Debian, Slackware, VMs
Posts: 7,342

Rep: Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746

Quote:
Originally Posted by travis82 View Post
English translation using google translator wasn't that bad (I'm saying this as a non-native).
Agreed. Google translate did an acceptable job for me; I enjoyed the article.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-12-2016, 04:29 AM   #47
Livestradamus
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Planet Earth (currently)
Distribution: Slackware & OpenBSD
Posts: 122

Rep: Reputation: 53
Reviews are opinions and you know what they say about everybody having opinions.....
 
Old 10-12-2016, 06:35 AM   #48
Philip Lacroix
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 441

Rep: Reputation: 574Reputation: 574Reputation: 574Reputation: 574Reputation: 574Reputation: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livestradamus View Post
Reviews are opinions and you know what they say about everybody having opinions.....
Yet there's still a fundamental difference between informed opinions, and uninformed ones.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-13-2016, 06:24 PM   #49
enorbet
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Virginia
Distribution: Slackware = Main OpSys
Posts: 4,784

Rep: Reputation: 4435Reputation: 4435Reputation: 4435Reputation: 4435Reputation: 4435Reputation: 4435Reputation: 4435Reputation: 4435Reputation: 4435Reputation: 4435Reputation: 4435
Despite some 80 years of advancement no automatic transmission can deliver the flexibility, efficiency, control, and power of a good stick shift. Oh wait! This thread isn't for automobile driver enthusiasts?
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-13-2016, 07:04 PM   #50
ReaperX7
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,558
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097
Quote:
Originally Posted by enorbet View Post
Despite some 80 years of advancement no automatic transmission can deliver the flexibility, efficiency, control, and power of a good stick shift. Oh wait! This thread isn't for automobile driver enthusiasts?
It fits very well Enorbet. You can't really learn without hands on application of IT... and I too enjoy the power, flexibility, and control of a stick shift automobile.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-13-2016, 10:03 PM   #51
Fat_Elvis
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2016
Distribution: FreeDOS 1.2
Posts: 309

Rep: Reputation: 92
And why exactly do we care about the opinions of some inept random on the internet?
 
Old 10-14-2016, 12:39 AM   #52
ttk
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 1,038
Blog Entries: 27

Rep: Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat_Elvis View Post
And why exactly do we care about the opinions of some inept random on the internet?
That depends on what you want.

If all you want to do is use Slackware at home, and you can look after your own needs, then public opinion doesn't matter.

If you want more people to join the Slackware community and contribute to the support pool, then public opinion matters.

If you want to be able to use Slackware in a business setting where someone other than yourself chooses the platform, then public opinion matters.

If you want upstream developers to refrain from introducing a systemd dependency to their package so they don't lose their Slackware (and Gentoo and Android) users, then public opinion matters.

That "random inept on the internet" has words and an audience, and his words shape that audience's thinking, which determine that audience's behavior. If you in no way whatsoever care about that audience's behavior, then you have no need to care about his words.

I have my fight, but I do not ask you to make it yours. To each their own.
 
6 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-14-2016, 10:35 AM   #53
hitest
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Void, Debian, Slackware, VMs
Posts: 7,342

Rep: Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746
Quote:
Originally Posted by ttk View Post
If you want upstream developers to refrain from introducing a systemd dependency to their package so they don't lose their Slackware (and Gentoo and Android) users, then public opinion matters.
Indeed! Thanks, ttk.
 
Old 10-14-2016, 11:01 AM   #54
phenixia2003
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,052

Rep: Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008
Hello,

Quote:
Originally Posted by ttk View Post
If you want upstream developers to refrain from introducing a systemd dependency to their package so they don't lose their Slackware (and Gentoo and Android) users, then public opinion matters.
Sincerely, losing android would not be as bad as their development tools are.

Android studio is a big crap full of bugs, their APIs, their (proprietary) java implementation which does not allow to test code without the need of an emulator.. That's pitiful to have used java this way. And I will not talk about Gradle.

All of this is simply pure s**t. However, since all of that come from Google, most of users thinks that's cool, but that's simply not, this is purely a trap.


--
SeB
 
Old 10-14-2016, 05:17 PM   #55
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,471
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980
reviewer:
"look! there are prettier balloons and whistles elsewhere"

(we) the slackers:
"what's wrong with our wrenches? why they don't like them?"

reviewer:
"it's not as sweet and shiny as others out there..."

(we) the slackers:
"but?... our hammers and chisels are sharp and sturdy!"


Other distros are mostly "products" and crafted "to form", rarely to perform

Our distro (Slackware) is a tool and crafted to perform, not to be lookalike.

It's a tool tailored to facilitate building it self, in the first place, right?

isn't that obvious?

and

What's wrong with Debian's text install? And isn't Slackware's installer more intuitive compared to it?
 
4 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-15-2016, 09:10 PM   #56
Fat_Elvis
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2016
Distribution: FreeDOS 1.2
Posts: 309

Rep: Reputation: 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by ttk View Post
That random inept on the internet" has words and an audience, and his words shape that audience's thinking, which determine that audience's behavior. If you in no way whatsoever care about that audience's behavior, then you have no need to care about his words.

I have my fight, but I do not ask you to make it yours. To each their own.
Indeed.

However, I believe the whole fight against systemd, and others of its infectious sort is wholly pointless. Because it is unwinnable.

As Linux becomes more widely accepted by the "common" person, more people will start investing in it. As with anything else, the ones with money to spend will be dictating the direction the operating system will take. Do you not think this is already happening? I understand that some people only use and develop for this operating system because they are paid to do so. I truly care nothing about their situation.

As much as I love Slackware, if I am forced to, I will happily move to some flavour of BSD, if Mr. Volkerding will not. Hey, didn't a Linus Torvalds decide to start this little kernel project for this exact reason?
 
Old 10-16-2016, 02:13 AM   #57
fido_dogstoyevsky
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: Victoria, Australia
Distribution: Slackware 15
Posts: 490
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 576Reputation: 576Reputation: 576Reputation: 576Reputation: 576Reputation: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat_Elvis View Post
...However, I believe the whole fight against windows, and others of its infectious sort is wholly pointless. Because it is unwinnable....
Changed one word, and the argument is the same. You appear to be using a non-MS and non-Apple operating system - do really think you're backing the unwinnable with Slackware?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat_Elvis View Post
...As Linux becomes more widely accepted by the "common" person, more people will start investing in it. As with anything else, the ones with money to spend will be dictating the direction the operating system will take. Do you not think this is already happening?...
Yes, just like it is with people with money dictating the use of MS/Apple products - is that affecting your choice of operating system?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat_Elvis View Post
...I understand that some people only use and develop for this operating system because they are paid to do so...
Part of their job description; helps them put food on the table. I had to use MS and Apple products in previous jobs - didn't like it much, but "liking" wasn't a criterion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat_Elvis View Post
...As much as I love Slackware, if I am forced to, I will happily move to some flavour of BSD...
Voting with your wallet/feet really does work well in the long term. I did it to escape MS and then again to escape the init system which has been named too many times. As time has gone by I can see more options, not fewer.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-16-2016, 04:08 AM   #58
Tonus
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware-15.0
Posts: 1,405
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514
LinuxInsider 14.2 Review

When I learned to drive a car, I've been tought to. Even when I started using several coffee maker. I I'm probably not rid of it, an other machine, especially if it's complex will throw me back to rtfm.

I can't understand why people expect to use such complex machines as computer are without learning anyhow.

I started with slackware more than 10 years ago and was very happy to have it install process very well documented : When I restarted with (modern) computers in early 90's, the lack of real docs made me do a few terrible mistakes.

The slackware way is, for me, the good way to do it.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-16-2016, 09:48 PM   #59
Fat_Elvis
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2016
Distribution: FreeDOS 1.2
Posts: 309

Rep: Reputation: 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by fido_dogstoyevsky View Post
Changed one word, and the argument is the same. You appear to be using a non-MS and non-Apple operating system - do really think you're backing the unwinnable with Slackware?

Yes, just like it is with people with money dictating the use of MS/Apple products - is that affecting your choice of operating system?

Part of their job description; helps them put food on the table. I had to use MS and Apple products in previous jobs - didn't like it much, but "liking" wasn't a criterion.

Voting with your wallet/feet really does work well in the long term. I did it to escape MS and then again to escape the init system which has been named too many times. As time has gone by I can see more options, not fewer.
I do believe we are actually agreeing on all points here.

Only difference being that I am not even attempting to fight the big corporate world and whatever new idiocy they may come up with. And yes, I wholly believe Slackware, if it stays this course, will never be the most popular Linux distribution. I am completely fine with this. I have chosen to use Slackware for its quality. Popularity had absolutely nothing to do with it.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-17-2016, 12:51 AM   #60
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,471
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980
But, by making Slackvare more popular, we are making the world a better place. Each tiny bit at a time.
And of course by supporting it.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Have even more questions about linux after reading Linuxinsider's review on Elementry OS Photocopyhornbill Linux - General 14 08-28-2016 10:54 AM
LXer: Review: Video Review Mageia 2 KDE – ReviewLinux.Com LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-23-2012 12:22 AM
LXer: Mini Review: Open Source in Harvard Business Review LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-03-2008 07:30 AM
LXer: Mini Review: Open Source inHarvard Business Review LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-02-2008 05:10 AM
LinuxInsider.com: What Differentiates Linux from Windows? thegeekster General 1 03-13-2004 07:03 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration