LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-05-2013, 04:31 AM   #31
cynwulf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367

Been running 3.10 since 3.9 went EOL. Had no problems with either release (albeit on my old hardware).

I would suppose that the point of LTS is that it's supported with security patches? So while problems, with regards to specific hardware, which were fixed in later releases, can persist, for many, it's usually a "safer" kernel to use than the latest stable. I would much rather run either a stable or an LTS kernel though than an EOL'd kernel such as 3.8 or 3.9. Thus my preference would be for 3.10.
 
Old 08-05-2013, 04:56 AM   #32
jtsn
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Posts: 922

Rep: Reputation: 480Reputation: 480Reputation: 480Reputation: 480Reputation: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by cynwulf View Post
I would suppose that the point of LTS is that it's supported with security patches?
Backports to LTS kernels are not restricted to security patches. That's the main issue with the upstream release engineering.
 
Old 08-05-2013, 05:01 AM   #33
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
3.10 is now LTS:
http://www.kroah.com/log/blog/2013/0...rnel-3-dot-10/
 
Old 08-05-2013, 05:39 AM   #34
cynwulf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtsn View Post
Backports to LTS kernels are not restricted to security patches. That's the main issue with the upstream release engineering.
Well security patches and bug fixes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...ml#post5002590
 
Old 08-05-2013, 05:57 AM   #35
sanjioh
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Do you guys think that the new radeon dpm code (targeting 3.11) could be included in future releases of the 3.10 branch? Or is it a far too big change to backport?
 
Old 08-05-2013, 11:58 AM   #36
1337_powerslacker
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Kansas, USA
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 862

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanjioh View Post
Do you guys think that the new radeon dpm code (targeting 3.11) could be included in future releases of the 3.10 branch? Or is it a far too big change to backport?
I think that's a question that is more appropriate to ask the kernel developers, since they would be doing the work, and would know better than we would.

Regards,

Matt
 
Old 08-06-2013, 03:00 AM   #37
sanjioh
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Looks like 3.10.x got LTS status, but more importantly fixes the power issue
on resume with some Intel machines. So, we're bumping the kernel to 3.10.5,
and will stick with that series for the release. A few more things to look at
before calling this a beta, but it's pretty close. Enjoy!
Thanks Patrick!
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Linux Kernel 3.8 Reaches End of Life (EOL) LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-13-2013 02:12 PM
LXer: Kernel Comment: Release early, release often! LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-31-2012 04:10 PM
Notice of Impending EOL (end of life) for old Slackware versions aaazen Slackware 8 07-14-2012 03:16 PM
EOL Slackware-10.1 thenob Slackware 2 04-02-2010 02:07 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration