Quote:
Originally Posted by bugman5
slackware is easy to get going, despite baseless rumors to the contrary
things like arch and tinycore leave me wishing for a blindfold and a cigarette
|
But tinycore is Slackware-based, now, in its recent incarnation, isn't it?
As the OP asked for a live distribution: I like
SLAX a lot. It's an unofficial port that allows to create your own Slackware-based distro in the simplest manner I have seen so far, and it fits on a mini-CD or USB stick.
I recently put in on a USB stick with two partitions. One for the system, and a LUKS encrypted one for data. On that second partition I carry all my access and account data with me, when I am travelling. I prepared the stick and the partitioning on my Slackware desktop, then put SLAX onto it, and it worked right away. And if you like it, you can install it to your hard disk, and even make an "official" Slackware install off it, later, using the standard package management tools.
BTW, while in the past there have been lots of derivatives of other distros appeared on the market, but in the recent past, Slackware seems to become a preferred basis for deriving customized distros. Fluxflux is just another popular example.
gargamel
EDIT:
As to Arch, I found these:
I am a complete GNU/Linux beginner. Should I use Arch?
Is Arch Linux a stable distro. Will I get frequent breakage?
Arch needs a stable branch
Arch has a very good reputation, maybe the best among all "source-based" distros. But number 2 is why I prefer Slackware. The team just ensures stability, I concentrate on what I want to do with the system, not on the system as such.