SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Does the 2.6 packages in the testing directory support SATA drives? I've just tried installing 2.6 (following the instructions), but when I rebooted I got a kernel panic saying that it was unable to mount the root file system (both with 2.6 and 2.4 )
PS - Is there anyway of rescuing my installation now? No, I didn't create a rescue disk as I don't have a floppy drive.
You can always boot off the boot cd and follow the text directions to boot into your system (the CD is a rescue disk as well). As far as I know they do have SATA support in that 2.6 kernel, I'm checking for it now and I'll report back.
Ok... did you make an initrd? If so (you should have, read /boot/README.initrd), when you selected the file system module you also would need to select the SATA system module so that it can be loaded before the root file system is mounted. If you tell me what SATA chipset you are using I can give you the exact mkinitrd command line you'd need.
This assumes your using reiserfs as your file system and the 2.6.10 kernel. Change this to ext3 and 2.6.x where applicable. Let me know if you have any problems.
Well after a lot of chroot'ing and rebooting I've got 2.6.11 working
When using 2.6 should I expect any problems using the standard tgz packages? I ask as firefox and thunderbird don't want to connect to remote web servers anymore
hey simon, it took me 9 tries to recompile my kernal to 2.6.10 correctly. If you think something might not work correctly you can always change your .config file and recompile again.
Quote:
PS - Is there anyway of rescuing my installation now? No, I didn't create a rescue disk as I don't have a floppy drive.
Your old kernel should still be on your machine under /usr/src/linux2.X.XX (unless you delted it). If you want to go mack to your old configuration, just cd to the directory containing the old kernel and compile again using your old .config file. Or if you really want to use the new kernel, copy you're .config file from your old kernel to your new kernel folder and run
Code:
make xconfig
just to make sure everything is there.
Quote:
Does the 2.6 packages in the testing directory support SATA drives?
I think it's an option under devices=> hard drives when you run menuconfig/xconfig. I use 2.6.10, so I don't know if 2.6.11 has the support or if it's deprecated. Your best shot is simply recompiling and installing your modules again (make, make modules_install, make install)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.