Red HatThis forum is for the discussion of Red Hat Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm trying to replace vista with Linux. Vista came packaged on my new machines. I've installed the same Linux on two others, also prepackaged ala Vista, with no problems.
My Linux installer loads the basic stuff then halts with message: "unable to find any devices of the type needed for this installation type", and gives me a list to choose from. None of these load, but I'm using the list to find possible drivers on the web and load them by floppy when it gets to this part. So far haven't found one that works. Most of them I have no idea what they are though I'm learning somewhat as I go.
I think the problem is missing chip controllers, because the older machines are Pentium D processors, the new ones are Pentium E. Motherboards and chipsets are also different.
I tried an upgrade of my Linux version, also another similar distro, but same result. Below is the info I hope helps.
LINUX version: Scientific Linux (same as Redhat Enterprise) 5.0
Lets get this clear - it is the Compaq Presario SR5450F which you are having trouble with?
Quote:
I think the problem is missing chip controllers, because the older machines are Pentium D processors, the new ones are Pentium E. Motherboards and chipsets are also different.
Pentium E is just the dual-core CPUs. These are well supported. It is much more likely to be the nvidia chipset giving problems.
The list seems to suggest it is having trouble with hard-drive controllers. Make sure you have disabled any on-board RAID and set SATA to legacy or IDE mode. You may need to pass kernel options at the boot: prompt like "nommconf all-generic-ide
This could be due to the SATA hdd on the new machines.
SATA hdd need legacy settings in the BIOS to be toggled before installing.
Do the old machines have SATA hdd?
Try the bios legacy settings toggled.
As a test, just get a newer revision of Linux - Fedora 8 for example. You don't want to downgrade the controller and lose the speed in the SATA by dropping it to IDE - not worth the performance hit. I am sure you will find the a newer release will easily handle the controller. I have had the same issue on many systems.
Although Centos 5.1 was released after f8, I have found that the installer does not understand the high speed SATA options - only if set to IDE emulation. Don't know why, but that is what I have found on numerous SATA based laptops - f8, ubuntu, and several others see the drive. Centos and RH don't (nor does XP unless you load a third party driver disk)
Even that can be misleading as a recently patched version can still be up to date despite having a lower version number.
But - here you see that CentOS uses an old kernel - this is because RHEL emphasizes stability and slow release cycles to be more business-friendly. CentOS 5 did add lots of HW support - CentOS 4 had kver 2.6.9 - that's quite a jump.
Isn't it time we heard from OP?
Last edited by Simon Bridge; 04-29-2008 at 01:29 AM.
Just to add to what Simon said, RHEL/Centos is goofy with their kernel numbers. Their kernels often have patches applied that add most of the same stuff as the newer kernels. It is one of the features I dislike most about RHEL/Centos. When an older (by number) Centos kernel supports hardware that a newer (by number) Fedora kernel does not, it drives me straight up the wall (say a F7 fresh install vs a Centos 5.1 fresh install). I run both Centos and Fedora. There was also a huge jump in hardware support between RHEL/Centos 5.0 and 5.1.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.