LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices

View Poll Results: Would nested quoting be helpful to you?
Yes 9 45.00%
No 11 55.00%
Other idea I'll detail in-thread 0 0%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-02-2010, 06:14 PM   #1
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Would nested quoting be helpful to you?


Continuing on from the third quoted block from this post, would members find it helpful or unhelpful if the LQ 'quote' button would include nested quotes (the quoted material in the post being quoted) or another button that would provide this feature in addition to the normal 'quote' button which strips previously quoted material?

It can be worked around manually (and I often do), so I may be alone in this, but it'd be handy to me.

Last edited by slakmagik; 09-02-2010 at 06:17 PM. Reason: fix verb tense
 
Old 09-02-2010, 06:21 PM   #2
Kenny_Strawn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Blog Entries: 62

Rep: Reputation: 54
Definitely yes. I know that PCWorld Forums had it and it really worked.
 
Old 09-02-2010, 06:46 PM   #3
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 147Reputation: 147
Eh, I've seen this in the xkcd forums, and to me it just seems annoying. Why bother reading a bunch of repeated nested quotes when you pretty much know that the next person is responding to what was last said?

Example (nested):

Quote:
Originally Posted by a different some other guy
Quote:
Originally Posted by some other guy
Quote:
Originally Posted by some guy
I think this is the one and only truth!
No, I disagree!
Wait a minute, your viewpoint here is false because of a), b), and c).
This could be simplified to:

Quote:
Originally Posted by some other guy
No, I disagree!
Wait a minute, your viewpoint here is false because of a), b), and c).

...assuming "a different some other guy" is responding to "some other guy", which as far as I've seen is often the case.
 
Old 09-03-2010, 02:29 AM   #4
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 6,928
Blog Entries: 51

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I think I agree with MrCode. It can look a mess if it goes three deep or more.
 
Old 09-03-2010, 05:35 PM   #5
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
So you both disagree with even having an option to 'full quote' in addition to 'quote'? And it's no different than email or usenet - standard clients like mutt and slrn provide full quotes if you opt to quote at all. If the quoting is irrelevant or too deep, netiquette has you trim the quotes. I'd find it easier to trim on occasion than to insert quotes. Also, many clients provide automatic quote folding - perhaps LQ could default to exposing one level of quoting and you could click on an item to expand all the quotes.
 
Old 09-03-2010, 05:46 PM   #6
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 27,017
Blog Entries: 54

Rep: Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764
Quote:
Originally Posted by slakmagik View Post
So you both disagree with even having an option to 'full quote' in addition to 'quote'? And it's no different than email or usenet (..). If the quoting is irrelevant or too deep, netiquette has you trim the quotes. I'd find it easier to trim on occasion than to insert quotes.
That implies one knows about proper netiquette like no top-posting, not quoting what one won't reply to. And I'm sorry to say but even people who've used the 'net longer than I have trouble understanding those basic rules, let alone new 'uns who probably never heard of netiquette. So that's a "no" from me too but thanks for offering the idea. BTW I have used nested quoting on LQ, but rarely, in the range of per year < 10 times.
 
Old 09-03-2010, 05:48 PM   #7
xeleema
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: D.i.t.h.o, Texas
Distribution: Slackware 13.x, rhel3/5, Solaris 8-10(sparc), HP-UX 11.x (pa-risc)
Posts: 987
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 248Reputation: 248Reputation: 248
I know I would really like this feature. Most of the quoting I do in large threads needs one nested quote in order for it to be relevant.
Example: User A says something. User B quotes them and makes an assumption. User C (me) quotes User B, and provides clarification.
If it's possible to "Cap" how many levels of quoting are done, then I think it's a great idea. Even if it's not, I don't think there will be too many "XKCD forum" examples running around here.
 
Old 09-03-2010, 06:25 PM   #8
mostlyharmless
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Distribution: Slackware -current (multilib) with kernel 3.15.5
Posts: 1,500
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 155Reputation: 155
Doubt I'd use it, but it might be useful. Maybe if the default was the current system, but one could use nested quotes in advanced mode by choice, then perhaps the objections above would be lessened. I'm not sure how that would work, it's just a notion.
 
Old 09-03-2010, 06:46 PM   #9
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
unSpawn: true enough about new users. They have to learn sometime, though.

mostlyharmless: yep, something like that sounds good to me, or like xeleema says - it's probably just that first level of nesting that would be really handy and just to get that in would be good.

Well, it looks like I'm losing but it's nice to know from xeleema and Kenny_Strawn that it's not just me.
 
Old 09-03-2010, 07:17 PM   #10
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 27,017
Blog Entries: 54

Rep: Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764
Winning, losing, just wait for more opinions I'd say. Just like the song says: make, a difference, a day can.
 
Old 09-04-2010, 06:48 AM   #11
johnsfine
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Distribution: Centos
Posts: 5,055

Rep: Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104
I answered Yes to the poll, because I was answering the literal question:

Would nested quoting be helpful to you?


I've answered several posts where the OP puts code or other external content in QUOTE tags instead of CODE tags. Quoting part of that external content is necessary to making a understandable response, so I need to manually copy that into the reply.

On occasion, I also want to use true nested quoting, which I also do by manual copying.

Deleting what I don't want in a quote is enough easier than copying what I do want, that automatic nested quoting would be helpful to me.

The better question is whether it would be good for the forum. Too many people quote the entire post when replying. More should be done to discourage that. If there is no practical way to discourage that wrong behavior, then automatic nested quoting would do the forum more harm than good.

So I would suggest it as a setting in user options, with the default set to not quote quotes. Users who are too lazy to delete the right parts of a quote probably wouldn't go into their options and change that setting from the default.
 
Old 09-04-2010, 10:24 AM   #12
Mr. Alex
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2010
Distribution: Arch + X.org + IceWM
Posts: 1,195

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Definitely NO!
It`ll be a mess. I will have to edit this every time. It won`t be helpful to me.
 
Old 09-04-2010, 01:35 PM   #13
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsfine View Post
Too many people quote the entire post when replying. More should be done to discourage that. If there is no practical way to discourage that wrong behavior, then automatic nested quoting would do the forum more harm than good.

So I would suggest it as a setting in user options, with the default set to not quote quotes. Users who are too lazy to delete the right parts of a quote probably wouldn't go into their options and change that setting from the default.
That's an excellent idea. A lot of this is theoretical in that I don't know how easy it would be to implement but, theoretically, I think this would address everyone's problems. The system would be unchanged by default but those who wanted could access it. I still like the idea of side-by-side 'quote'/'quote full' buttons, but I also like this idea.

unSpawn: thanks for the encouragement.
 
Old 09-04-2010, 02:26 PM   #14
johnsfine
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Distribution: Centos
Posts: 5,055

Rep: Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104Reputation: 1104
Quote:
Originally Posted by slakmagik View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsfine View Post
setting in user options, with the default set to not quote quotes.
That's an excellent idea.
Couldn't resist

Quote:
I still like the idea of side-by-side 'quote'/'quote full' buttons
Sorry I can't be as supportive of your idea as you were of mine. I think the side-by-side buttons would invite abuse by all the people who currently quote full posts out of either laziness or misunderstanding of netiquette.

Last edited by johnsfine; 09-04-2010 at 02:28 PM.
 
Old 09-04-2010, 03:06 PM   #15
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsfine View Post
Sorry I can't be as supportive of your idea as you were of mine. I think the side-by-side buttons would invite abuse by all the people who currently quote full posts out of either laziness or misunderstanding of netiquette.
I see what you're saying. I hadn't thought of that. Certain users might think 'Full quote? Full is more and more is better, right? I'll click that one.' I was just assuming they'd know to pick which one they needed. So, yeah, your idea is better.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quoting issue in PHP resetreset Programming 2 04-16-2010 06:53 AM
PostgreSQL quoting problem rnturn Programming 6 07-02-2008 08:05 PM
shell quoting within a function dazdaz Linux - Software 4 09-03-2007 11:01 AM
bash - quoting RGummi Linux - General 3 10-21-2006 03:06 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration