LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The embarrassed emoticon to me looks more like a 'shouting' one than embarrassed, and since we now have a redfaced emoticon, maybe the embarrassed one should just be changed to a shouting emoticon.
It's a nice emoticon ... it does look embarassed. It's just that at the same time, I get ideas of it kissing (and being embarrassed), yawning, embarassed or sick at the doctor's office (open wide and say ahh).
Maybe it's humble at a Catholic church, receiving the Eucharist.
I think it's neat when forums have a lot of icons to choose from ... I just saw that some of Nixcraft's are good ... they even have a violin player and a drooling emoticon.
I can see that I am in the minority here, but I hate it. LQ's "professional" appearance has just dropped 20+ points. Moving smilies are an obnoxious distraction, & if you're going to have them, then it's time to bring avatars for the rest of us.
One of the reasons I have almost 3,500 posts here & less than 30 at MepisLovers is the moving smilies & avatars there.
Edit: I'm wrong to imply that moving smilies are a new thing @LQ -- I'd forgotten :newbie: -- I just see them so seldom, I'd forgotten they are here. Seeing all those hat tips really unmade my day.
Last edited by archtoad6; 08-03-2009 at 07:10 AM.
Reason: correction
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
We definitely try to keep LQ having a minimal and professional look. If the consensus is that one or more of the smilies added detracts from that, we'll certainly remove them.
Distribution: Slackware (personalized Window Maker), Mint (customized MATE)
Posts: 1,309
Rep:
I don't use emoticons at all. A few years ago I corresponded with some guy. He used a lot of emoticons. He put them in almost every sentence. Once upon a time I wrote to him:
We definitely try to keep LQ having a minimal and professional look. If the consensus is that one or more of the smilies added detracts from that, we'll certainly remove them.
--jeremy
It's not the smilies themselves that bother me, but the ones that move*. Is there any way a permanent "no motion" option could be added to our LQ profiles? It should include, if possible, not only LQ originated content, but also served advertising. Especially Flash.
In fact they distract me so much that I wonder if I have some kind of undiagnosed borderline epilepsy or other neurological problem.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.