LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Original Poster
Rep:
"Thanked x times in y posts" has already been changed. PM's are only enabled for a *very* small fraction of members, so that's not a viable alternative. Many members turn email contact off as well. Thanks for the feedback, keep it coming.
I've got to say, I went looking for how to post a "thanks", and it's pretty hard to find. I finally stumbled on the thumbs-up icon, but not what I'd call intuitive. A button thart says "thanks the poster" would be better.
Side question - how many "thanks" have been made site wide?
I have two basic thoughts on this.
First, the optional nature carries the problems associated with any voluntary polling, and these tend to lead to meaningless results.
Second, I find that a significant portion of members don't even bother posting a quick "it worked, thanks" message, let alone finding a rating system. Then again, a lot of posters can't be bothered reading the rules of using meaningful thread titles either.
I don't really care either way, but I don't think I'd spend too much time on it myself.
Total posters - 18
Total posts by posters - 92,795
Total thanks to those posters - 12
Thanks to those posters on this thread - 9
Thanks to non-mod/admin - 1
Last edited by billymayday; 12-09-2008 at 07:26 PM.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Original Poster
Rep:
billymayday, to be fair the posters have had eight *years* to make the 92,795 posts and closer to 4 hours for the thanks. It's possible we'll switch the thanks button to something different.
Any further feedback about "Thanks" should be posted in that thread. Any discussion about the possibility of enabling a recognition system here at LQ should remain in this thread.
Well, as long as I can opt out of the rep system, I'm ok with it. Otherwise, I am against it, because people can rep you down just because they don't agree with you or what you say, or just don't like you. What's the point of that ? It usually ends up where there will be a battle of the reps. If someone reps you down and you know who it is, you rep them down. That's pretty much what ended up happening in the last forum I was on that had a rep system. So, again, if you do enable it, please let us opt out of it if we want.
There is only the option to increase or decrease thanks. Right now (and for the future I hope), it will be a receive thanks or receive no thanks situation.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.