LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-09-2008, 06:32 PM   #46
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084

"Thanked x times in y posts" has already been changed. PM's are only enabled for a *very* small fraction of members, so that's not a viable alternative. Many members turn email contact off as well. Thanks for the feedback, keep it coming.

--jeremy
 
Old 12-09-2008, 06:56 PM   #47
billymayday
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, OpenSuse, Slack, Gentoo, Debian, Arch, PCBSD
Posts: 6,678

Rep: Reputation: 122Reputation: 122
I've got to say, I went looking for how to post a "thanks", and it's pretty hard to find. I finally stumbled on the thumbs-up icon, but not what I'd call intuitive. A button thart says "thanks the poster" would be better.

Side question - how many "thanks" have been made site wide?

I have two basic thoughts on this.

First, the optional nature carries the problems associated with any voluntary polling, and these tend to lead to meaningless results.

Second, I find that a significant portion of members don't even bother posting a quick "it worked, thanks" message, let alone finding a rating system. Then again, a lot of posters can't be bothered reading the rules of using meaningful thread titles either.

I don't really care either way, but I don't think I'd spend too much time on it myself.
 
Old 12-09-2008, 07:04 PM   #48
billymayday
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, OpenSuse, Slack, Gentoo, Debian, Arch, PCBSD
Posts: 6,678

Rep: Reputation: 122Reputation: 122
A quick straw poll of this thread:

Total posters - 18
Total posts by posters - 92,795
Total thanks to those posters - 12
Thanks to those posters on this thread - 9
Thanks to non-mod/admin - 1

Last edited by billymayday; 12-09-2008 at 07:26 PM.
 
Old 12-09-2008, 07:36 PM   #49
lumak
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 799
Blog Entries: 32

Rep: Reputation: 111Reputation: 111
can we get a thanks button on the blogs?
 
Old 12-09-2008, 08:08 PM   #50
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
billymayday, to be fair the posters have had eight *years* to make the 92,795 posts and closer to 4 hours for the thanks. It's possible we'll switch the thanks button to something different.

--jeremy
 
Old 12-09-2008, 08:14 PM   #51
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
I've started a thread about the thanks system here: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...embers-689458/

Any further feedback about "Thanks" should be posted in that thread. Any discussion about the possibility of enabling a recognition system here at LQ should remain in this thread.

--jeremy
 
Old 12-09-2008, 08:15 PM   #52
billymayday
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, OpenSuse, Slack, Gentoo, Debian, Arch, PCBSD
Posts: 6,678

Rep: Reputation: 122Reputation: 122
Actually, I only made that post after seeing http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...roblem-635313/, there the thanks to DotHQ appears to have been made in April of this year.

Was the facility enabled and the disabled, or was this a recent thanks to an old post?

That said, I reckon I've given a pretty good display of lies, damned lies and statistics.
 
Old 12-09-2008, 08:17 PM   #53
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
Thank was a thanks made today to an older post. You can currently "Thanks" any post made in the last 365 days.

--jeremy
 
Old 12-10-2008, 07:24 AM   #54
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,299
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
If it's retrospective, retroactive, retrowhatever, I might go back through all my old posts to see if there's anyone I can bluethumb.
 
Old 12-10-2008, 07:33 AM   #55
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Well, as long as I can opt out of the rep system, I'm ok with it. Otherwise, I am against it, because people can rep you down just because they don't agree with you or what you say, or just don't like you. What's the point of that ? It usually ends up where there will be a battle of the reps. If someone reps you down and you know who it is, you rep them down. That's pretty much what ended up happening in the last forum I was on that had a rep system. So, again, if you do enable it, please let us opt out of it if we want.
 
Old 12-10-2008, 08:06 AM   #56
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475
There is only the option to increase or decrease thanks. Right now (and for the future I hope), it will be a receive thanks or receive no thanks situation.
 
  


Reply

Tags
unwanted



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Manage and Protect Your Open Source Reputation LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-29-2007 03:21 AM
LXer: Novell fights to defend its reputation LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-21-2006 09:21 PM
LXer: Sco Group works to revive product line, reputation LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-14-2006 01:54 AM
Reputation System cs-cam LQ Suggestions & Feedback 45 01-07-2006 10:47 AM
C program to see user log on in system and print user with real user name also naveen245 Programming 2 12-21-2005 12:53 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration