LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
LQ User Reputation System
We're considering enabling the user reputation system here at LQ, but would like your feedback before we do. This system would allow you to leave positive (and potentially, negative) feedback for other members. A members reputation level would then be displayed in each post. Our plan is that you will need to have made a single post to leave feedback for other members. It's likely you'll only be able to leave negative feedback once you're a senior member. You will be able to see what others members have left you feedback. It's possible that we'd even allow you to opt out of the system entirely in your UserCP.
If you have any thoughts on us enabling this system, feel free to post them in this thread. I'd also be interested in how members feel about the specific implementation guidelines I've outlined above. Thanks.
My (personal) preference is for a simple 'Thanks' button. This creates an incentive for knowledgeable members to be helpful. It also allows those with questions to view a rudimentary trust level (based on how many times a person has been thanked).
FWIW, two successful implementations of 'Thanks' button schemes can be viewed at daemonforums.org and forums.freebsd.org.
I don't care for negative feedback systems at all. They invite weird politics and rivalries.
I am generally in favor of this. Obviously, such a thing needs to be moderated, and that will involve some increase in workload for <someone>.
I would like to see the graduation to different levels tied to performance, and not just the number of posts--In particular, the title of "guru" should be backed up by some level of demonstrated knowledge. The reputation system would obviously help do this.
One other thought: Starting this "mid-stream" can result in newer members acquiring a reputation faster than the old timers whose posting rate may have fallen off. How would that be handled?
Distribution: Ubuntu, Slackware, Gentoo, Fedora, Red Hat, Puppy Linux
Rather than a feedback system which would possibly encourage flaming of members or foster clicks/alliances, I would like to see some sort of feedback system which would rate a post as helpful or not helpful. The ratio of helpful to not helpful posts would be counted toward the ranking or if that is not technically possible just count the helpful posts.
Whatever the system, ranking and feedback should be anonymous.
It is a very workable plan. It can be abused though. Normally you cannot give rep points to the same person twice. It will tell you to spread the points around. No matter what the spread around variable is set to some members will abuse it. They will give rep points to as many as they need to and then ramp up their buddies points. Working together I've seen a team totally abuse the intended use of rep points. It caused hard feelings on the forum I saw this happen on.
I think you can limit who gives negative rep points to particular member groups which is also a good thing.
For guru's and such could give a moderators vote that would give bonus points so they would not start off equal with everyone else. Especially if they post lots of solutions. Or just create an honorary group for them.
Would hate the workload possibilities on this but, could require moderator's approval on negative posts. Could also possibly recruit regular users to help moderate just that.
Last edited by Hern_28; 12-09-2008 at 02:18 PM.
Reason: Another thought.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
A couple comments so far:
* I like the idea of being able to thank a user for a specific post, regardless of which way we go with the reputation system. Look for this to come to LQ *very* soon.
[Back to the reputation system]
* It's not a requirement that you've posted in the thread.
* It's already possible to rate a thread (which is a very underused feature).
* Everyone would start off at the same level.
Just that I should have to see it - I place this along with avatars and siglines.
As I've said before I'd rather we didn't even have rankings or post counts. This will just generate more noise threads aka "when do I stop being a newbie, what's a guru ..."
I'm concerned about abuse to a rating, particularly excessive negative feedback. For example, eBay have recently abandoned negative feedback for a buyer to leave on a seller, presumably due to abuse; the system wasn't working since people were afraid of receiving retaliatory negative feedback for a genuinely poor transaction. Although I suppose there's no financial element here, so it's potentially less of an issue. As for the thanks option, I think that's a much more tenable system. When people receive a solution to their problem, they can say thanks in such a manner that others can benefit; at present their only option is to thank the person in a post in the thread.
I see the button for thanks has been added to this thread at least - it seems to me it's a little pixellated; perhaps a higher res version is needed?