LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2023, 06:13 AM   #16
elcore
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2014
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,753

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel View Post
What kind of people object to other people wanting more privacy?
Easy. The majority. Because;
Obscurity is no security. Signed, a cop.
Empty safe, with no money in it, is not cool. Signed, a burglar.
The minority, "Robin Hood" and "crooked cop" don't really fit into this, they're usually both guilty until proven innocent.
Hence, privacy = bad (in majority opinion). In some professions it's achievable, impossible in most.
Living in middle of nowhere with no cell tower is probably most privacy one can get these days.

I didn't see the delay or the warning, to keep the thread relevant and on topic. I don't use tor.
 
Old 02-02-2023, 11:26 AM   #17
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,228

Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320
Quote:
Originally Posted by linux-man View Post
Is LQ a site where nefarious actors gravitate?
Yes. Look at the massive amount of spam we get.

Last edited by dugan; 02-04-2023 at 01:38 PM.
 
Old 02-10-2023, 03:42 AM   #18
mrmazda
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2016
Location: SE USA
Distribution: openSUSE 24/7; Debian, Knoppix, Mageia, Fedora, others
Posts: 5,813
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068
Due to this problem, yesterday I blocked Cloudfare via my hosts file, but it didn't help. I compose, the security checking screen replaces the input screen, which is ultimately followed by a 100% white, useless viewport. If I'm lucky I can skip back to the input screen to find my input intact, but that must be copied into a whole different browser, which means open one, login, find the thread, etc. before proceeding with "Go Advanced" to see if it needs editing/reediting. https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...0/#post6410317 is the last instance of a thread where this happened to me.
 
Old 02-10-2023, 04:46 AM   #19
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,587
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455
I wouldn't expect a big cloud host like Cloudflare to be blocked so easily! But I have got into the habit of running ctrl-a ctrl-c on any sizeable post so that at least I don't lose it if there's a glitch.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-10-2023, 07:17 AM   #20
boughtonp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,605

Rep: Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel View Post
I wouldn't expect a big cloud host like Cloudflare to be blocked so easily!
Blocking them isn't hard - subsequently using any website which has opted to use them is the difficult bit. One can't access a building if they've stopped themself entering the only doorway.


Quote:
But I have got into the habit of running ctrl-a ctrl-c on any sizeable post so that at least I don't lose it if there's a glitch.
Indeed - that's also good practice in case a site goes down or network cuts out or whatever.

However, I have been hitting the LQ filters more often recently, and it's getting more and more frustrating having to repeatedly figure out what specific fragment of my text the broken and useless filters are objecting to.

 
Old 02-10-2023, 09:49 AM   #21
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
Moving forward, please post the RayID when this happens and we'll see what changes we can make to ensure a better experience.

--jeremy
 
Old 02-14-2023, 06:00 AM   #22
boughtonp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,605

Rep: Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548Reputation: 2548
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy View Post
...we'll see what changes we can make to ensure a better experience.
Fix the check for whether a request comes from a registered user, so these filters can be entirely bypassed? Otherwise it's just playing whac-a-mole all the time...

Although, probably at least half of my recent blocks involved "something (something" - i.e. removing the opening parentheses would get past - the closing one seems to make no difference - but it also depended on the text either side; removing the rest of the line either before or after would often get through.

Wouldn't be surprised if it's a flawed "AI" filter that sees a certain quota/combination of SQL keywords or symbols and incorrectly assumes SQL injection.

 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-15-2023, 08:37 PM   #23
Turbocapitalist
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Distribution: Linux Mint, Devuan, OpenBSD
Posts: 7,313
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 3723Reputation: 3723Reputation: 3723Reputation: 3723Reputation: 3723Reputation: 3723Reputation: 3723Reputation: 3723Reputation: 3723Reputation: 3723Reputation: 3723
The new LQ setup is actively blocking all kinds of innocuous sample code. It just blocked another post of mine yet again until I removed the illustrative code sample entirely. That kind of impediment to posting code snippets is not appropriate or acceptable on such a ICT-oriented site as LQ. We need to be able to post sample of shell scripts and other code on occasion.

Please remove the offending javascript from LQ's pages.

If some processing is needed, please move it server side. LQ is in PHP. There are many who could help with that, even if no one is willing to publicly admit knowledge of PHP or past use of PHP.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-16-2023, 03:28 AM   #24
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,587
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455Reputation: 4455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbocapitalist View Post
The new LQ setup is actively blocking all kinds of innocuous sample code. It just blocked another post of mine yet again until I removed the illustrative code sample entirely. That kind of impediment to posting code snippets is not appropriate or acceptable on such a ICT-oriented site as LQ. We need to be able to post sample of shell scripts and other code on occasion.
I second that! I was recently blocked from supplying an answer to a query because the code I wanted to pass on to the OP was deemed unacceptable by some robot or other. It takes the whole point out of LQ.
 
Old 02-17-2023, 06:05 PM   #25
linux-man
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2016
Location: Geneva
Distribution: native install of Parrot Home Edition 5.0 Debian (no security tools) 64 bit, KDE, 5.14.0-9parrot1,
Posts: 872

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy View Post
Moving forward, please post the RayID when this happens and we'll see what changes we can make to ensure a better experience.
RayID 7772b67cfb996446 (from post #1),
but my ip changes from time to time does that matter? On occasions all is well a few minutes in, then Cloudfare will kick in and do its thing (block).

Here's two more for you as I got blocked by Cloudfare whilst editing this very post and had to retype some stuff again:
Ray ID: 79b295091fc6cac9
Ray ID: 79b2972a5eeb6459

The Cloudfare experience is getting to Guantanamo Bay levels, its very disruptive, stressful, just green light all registered long time users. Easy to do since I presume LQ is operated by a crew of tech whizzes.

Registered users have other things to attend to in life, time is our most precious commodity they say, they can't be literally waiting around for hours on end for Cloudfare to do its thing. Why make it the default to use copy and paste because you fear Cloudfare will kick in and block you whilst you reply back?


Quote:
Originally Posted by boughtonp View Post
Fix the check for whether a request comes from a registered user, so these filters can be entirely bypassed? Otherwise it's just playing whac-a-mole all the time...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbocapitalist View Post
The new LQ setup is actively blocking all kinds of innocuous sample code. It just blocked another post of mine yet again until I removed the illustrative code sample entirely.
It does it to me without any innocuous code.

Last edited by linux-man; 02-17-2023 at 07:08 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-18-2023, 02:02 AM   #26
mrmazda
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2016
Location: SE USA
Distribution: openSUSE 24/7; Debian, Knoppix, Mageia, Fedora, others
Posts: 5,813
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068
Ray ID: 79b53653ea53ad70
I clicked the verify human box, but it still resulted in a white viewport.
 
Old 02-20-2023, 10:28 AM   #27
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmazda View Post
Ray ID: 79b53653ea53ad70
I clicked the verify human box, but it still resulted in a white viewport.
Thanks. I've made some changes based on this.

--jeremy
 
Old 02-23-2023, 09:49 AM   #28
teckk
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 5,138
Blog Entries: 6

Rep: Reputation: 1827Reputation: 1827Reputation: 1827Reputation: 1827Reputation: 1827Reputation: 1827Reputation: 1827Reputation: 1827Reputation: 1827Reputation: 1827Reputation: 1827
Took 3 tries and 2 different web browser engines to post this.

Ray ID: 79e11228f8f5e127

https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...35#post6413235
 
Old 02-24-2023, 01:20 AM   #29
pan64
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 21,876

Rep: Reputation: 7315Reputation: 7315Reputation: 7315Reputation: 7315Reputation: 7315Reputation: 7315Reputation: 7315Reputation: 7315Reputation: 7315Reputation: 7315Reputation: 7315
Ray ID: 79e66f5fe9c8c287
https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...7/#post6413387
 
Old 02-24-2023, 10:11 AM   #30
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
I've made an adjustment which should address both of the previous cases.

--jeremy
 
  


Reply

Tags
cloudflare



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: World's most frustrating televised Linux install just got more frustrating LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-03-2015 01:50 AM
mysql and ssh connection delays ernesto_cgf Linux - Networking 0 06-21-2007 01:13 PM
why linux is frustrating rosko Linux - Software 64 08-09-2003 03:03 PM
Installing stuff on the most frustrating OS in the world. Travis86 Linux - Software 4 01-02-2003 05:25 AM
Frustrating PlanetNEO Linux - Networking 24 12-09-2002 03:56 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration