Bad links for "Did you find this post helpful? Yes"
LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Bad links for "Did you find this post helpful? Yes"
Recently I used a link to mark a post as helpful, but it did something unexpected: it made me go to the first page of this discussion, and I wondered a bit for a reason to this.
These links seems bad in this aspect: they should always show us the page where the post we marked is, not other pages (for multiple page discussions). And, at best, they may point us to that specific post again, since each post have an anchor.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
I can't reproduce the behavior you're describing. It's possible you're blocking javascript in a way that will not allow LQ to mark the post as helpful without re-loading the page.
Yes, I turn off Javascript most of the time. Turn it off too and you will see exactly what I showed here, including the format of the links that I pasted here (I changed them just to make it more neutral, but I may paste more complete and working examples, if you want).
With JS off, it redirects to another page, not the one that the post is? It is a bug! The link could have been the correct link! It is an improvement!
Further, after I made the post, I discovered that the "not permanent" links the mail messages have are worse due the words used in the last part of the message (which I did not show):
Code:
Here is the message that has just been posted:
***************
Here we read just the start of the message, not it all
***************
There may also be other replies, but you will not receive any more
notifications until you visit the forum again.
And we will see just the more recent post of the thread at the moment we open that link (not when the mail message was composed); and neither the first that we did not yet read. This is wrong!
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dedec0
Yes, I turn off Javascript most of the time. Turn it off too and you will see exactly what I showed here, including the format of the links that I pasted here (I changed them just to make it more neutral, but I may paste more complete and working examples, if you want).
With JS off, it redirects to another page, not the one that the post is? It is a bug! The link could have been the correct link! It is an improvement!
I tested with javascript off, and while the page reloads it never takes me to a different thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dedec0
Further, after I made the post, I discovered that the "not permanent" links the mail messages have are worse due the words used in the last part of the message (which I did not show):
Code:
Here is the message that has just been posted:
***************
Here we read just the start of the message, not it all
***************
There may also be other replies, but you will not receive any more
notifications until you visit the forum again.
And we will see just the more recent post of the thread at the moment we open that link (not when the mail message was composed); and neither the first that we did not yet read. This is wrong!
You will always be brought to the first post you have not read, not the most recent. That said, you have already started a dedicated thread for that topic, please don't mix threads together as it makes following/resolving issues very difficult.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.