Linux - Wireless NetworkingThis forum is for the discussion of wireless networking in Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi!
I'm using ndiswrapper to get my wireless to work! It doesn't work with kismet, its a broadcom card. As far as I know, win drivers doesn't support passive mode (the mode that alows kismet to find networks in passive way). I want to buy a new card, where I could plugin external antena, but nothing too expensive. Please give me a suggestions what card could run on Linux without ndiswrapper and will be able to run with kismet? what could be the cost for this cind of card? Sorry, I'm a real newbie to networking! Thank you!
I have struggled with this issue for months. I have solved this issue by purchasing a 802.11b card with Prism chipset. There are a couple of things I can tell you from my experience:
1. Prism cards are recognized with orinoco chipsets. You have to manually solve this issue. I couldn't solve it yet. If I can, I will post it.
2. If I were to buy a card again, I would go with a card that has Atheros chipset.
3. If your chipset is Broadcom 43xx series, then those chipsets are supported by kernel version 2.6.17-rc2. There is a website about this, which I can direct you to: http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/
FYI, I still hold my USR MaxG pcmcia card at hand waiting for support from kernel and kismet.
Thank you very much!! Yes, I have the 43xx series. My card is Broadcom Corporation BCM4318 [AirForce One 54g] 802.11g, but as far as I know, they might not work:
Quote:
Note:
Support for newer cards (4318 chipset) is still being worked on. Please be patient while we figure out what they changed. It should work at lower rates (11M) for now.
So I guess I will have to search for a new card anyway.. is there any list with Linux supported cards? Thank you!
Thank you!! So it means, if I compile 2.6.17 kernel, I will get the drivers for my card? Stupid question, but what does 2.6.17-rc2 mean?? I found a kernel 2.6.17.1, will this do? Thank you!
bcm43xx's work fine in Monitor mode on Linux - the problem they have is with transmission power on the BCM4318 (IIRC< the developers are struggling to control the transmission power, so at the moment, transmission range is ~2 metres according to some reports and it only works at 11M).
So to summarise, since Monitor mode is passive, bcm43xx should work fine for what you want (the only thing of note is that it does not yet support packet injection).
(2.6.17-rc2 refers to 2.6.17 Release Candidate 2 - this has now been superceded by 2.6.17/ 2.6.17.1).
Thanks!
I finally got thous bcm43xx running, but when I scan for a wireless networks, nothing comes up!! So that means, that the distance between wireless router and my wireless card can't be higher than 2 meters?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.